one word

i can end all this banta with just one word........




SPACESHIPS


thats right folks, they are real, if the world was flat we would know. what would the goverment hide it for? people might fall. i dont beleve that any one would seriously beleve in this non sence.

let me ask...have you personally been into space?  also, have you seen the round earth?  this is truly not arguement for my belief in a flat earth either. but because spaceships exist, and it is believed that people have been into space, that does not create or provide any evidence for either of our beliefs.

why would they hide it from us? i am well up for beleveing that the goverment hide stuff from us, i could write about any number of things with evidentiol backing, but lets face it fe theory is a joke, isnt it?

The theory is not a joke.

The theory is not a joke.

but the people who believe it are

Quote from: "Unimportant"

The theory is not a joke.

but the people who believe it are

That is an insult to all of us who know the truth. I showed you photographic proof of the FE. Not out of some textbook somewhere but with my own camera. If necessary I will bring in a photographic expert to examine the photo to prove it has not been doctored in any way.

Quote from: "Unimportant"

The theory is not a joke.

but the people who believe it are

you have done well!


"let me ask...have you personally been into space? also, have you seen the round earth? this is truly not arguement for my belief in a flat earth either. but because spaceships exist, and it is believed that people have been into space, that does not create or provide any evidence for either of our beliefs."

aparently there is such a thing as wind, but have you actualy seen this wind? i think its part of a goverment conspirasy.
i could not possably write all the evedence for re theory and you could not possably write ANY evedence for fe theory.

people who beleve in fe seem to hide behind a "your not open to ideas" thing witch is just as laughable the american goverment.

That is an insult to all of us who know the truth. I showed you photographic proof of the FE. Not out of some textbook somewhere but with my own camera. If necessary I will bring in a photographic expert to examine the photo to prove it has not been doctored in any way.

Are you talking about that photo of a big ass iceberg from Norway?

No, I am talking about my photo in the "Photographic proof of the FE!!!!!!!" thread.

Oh. It all becomes clear now!! Yes YES! The Sun is actually a torch, and the moon a rubber duck!

I'm glad I was able to spread the truth to yet another.

I like how this theory is cerefully constructed so that any attempt at disprooving it is dismissed as an attemt to quash FE'ers.

Let me tell you FE'ers something, the goverment could care less about the shape of the Earth. They are more concerend with furthuring there own agenda for economic domination. There have been PICTURES OF THE ROUND EARTH! I have seen them, we all have seen them. The goverment are not corvering up FE, they couldnt organize a suprize birth day party for a three year old, let alone keep up a conspiracy for over A THOUSAND YEARS.

Also, how about the recent advent of private spacetravel?

also, have you seen the round earth?

Yes I have, and so would you if you flew anywhere in an aeroplane.

I have also seen thousands of photos of the earth from various curvature demonstrating angles. I have never seen a photo that indicates the flatness of the earth from an appropriate height, despite, given the sensational nature of such a photo if it existed, the likelihood of it having been brought to my attention.

I like how this theory is cerefully constructed so that any attempt at disprooving it is dismissed as an attemt to quash FE'ers.

Actually, I think that it's carefully constructed so that any attempt at disproving it is dismissed as erroneous' how is that different from the RE theory?

the goverment could care less about the shape of the Earth.

That might be plausible, assuming that the Earth is round.  Actually, no, it's not: they need to know what shape the Earth is in order to know the fastest routes for sending their ICBMs and long-distance bombers around.  Come to think of it, that's a good reason why they'd hide the true shape of the Earth: so when Iran tries to lauch intercontinental missles at the U.S. (or whatever) they fall harmlessly in the Atlantic, or better yet, go over the Ice Wall.

There have been PICTURES OF THE ROUND EARTH! I have seen them, we all have seen them.

Probably you are misinterpreting the pictures.  Don't feel bad; it's very common.

-Erasmus

Quote

the goverment couldn't care less about the shape of the Earth.

That might be plausible, assuming that the Earth is round.  Actually, no, it's not: they need to know what shape the Earth is in order to know the fastest routes for sending their ICBMs and long-distance bombers around.  Come to think of it, that's a good reason why they'd hide the true shape of the Earth: so when Iran tries to lauch intercontinental missles at the U.S. (or whatever) they fall harmlessly in the Atlantic, or better yet, go over the Ice Wall.


-Erasmus

Although, thats a reason why the government would care... Why would we care? The government already knows the shape of the Earth, whether it is Flat or Round.
I know for a fact that I couldn't care less about the shape of the world, as well as many others. And the people who *need* to know, would surely be in the loop.

that's a good reason why they'd hide the true shape of the Earth: so when Iran tries to lauch intercontinental missles at the U.S. (or whatever) they fall harmlessly in the Atlantic, or better yet, go over the Ice Wall.

No thats a stupid idea. What if they accidently hit the Ice Wall, end of life as we know it.

Although, thats a reason why the government would care... Why would we care?

I thought we were talking about the government...

I know for a fact that I couldn't care less about the shape of the world,

So, why are you on this forum exactly?

No thats a stupid idea. What if they accidently hit the Ice Wall, end of life as we know it.

The Ice Wall is a little thicker than the walls in your house, I should think.  I would estimate..... the radius of Antarctica.  An ICBM wouldn't destroy the Ice Wall, or even put a hole in it that would allow water to flow into space.

-Erasmus

Does anybody remember a few years ago when the Columbia Space craft broke apart while re-entering the round earth in 2003?

Well I live in north Texas. I was able to watch see it as it burned over the sky that saturday morning. Space re-entry decentigrated and it's path went over the pacific ocean, over California, nearly over my head, and so on. If I wanted, I could have driven to one of the places where a piece of the space ship actually crashed. (They showed another piece on the news.)

That is one of the reasons I believe the when National Space programs say they've been to earth, I believe it. Because I've seen that ship burning in the air around the time news reported it.

Also... I wonder if scientists never left earth, where do the space shuttles go when they lift off? The there's a camera that usually follows them for as long as they can see it. So where do they go after they fly so high straight up that it can't be seen anymore?

Quote from: "sven1988uk"

Although, thats a reason why the government would care... Why would we care?

I thought we were talking about the government...

Quote

I know for a fact that I couldn't care less about the shape of the world,

So, why are you on this forum exactly?

Quote

No thats a stupid idea. What if they accidently hit the Ice Wall, end of life as we know it.

The Ice Wall is a little thicker than the walls in your house, I should think.  I would estimate..... the radius of Antarctica.  An ICBM wouldn't destroy the Ice Wall, or even put a hole in it that would allow water to flow into space.

-Erasmus

1:

The government already knows the shape of the Earth, whether it is Flat or Round.

Try quoting the entire bit... As it stands anyways, the government and us are linked... If they didn't inform a few of the officials about the Ice Wall how are they suppose to keep it a secret.

2: I'm here because I'm bored.

3:Somehow, I think a ICBM would make short work of frozen water...

That is one of the reasons I believe the when National Space programs say they've been to earth, ...

I'm guessing you mean "to space".

... I believe it. Because I've seen that ship burning in the air around the time news reported it.

You saw it burning up in the air?  You mean, not in the vacuum of space?  Interesting.  So how do you know it was in space?  Furthermore, how do you know why it was burning up, or that the thing you saw was a space station?  Perhaps it was an experimental craft which, like Icarus, flew too close to the sun?

where do they go after they fly so high straight up that it can't be seen anymore?

I guess..... someplace you can't see?

Oh, wait, have you actually seen a shuttle launch?

-Erasmus

Quote from: "Wow Just... Wow"

That is one of the reasons I believe the when National Space programs say they've been to earth, ...

I'm guessing you mean "to space".

Quote

... I believe it. Because I've seen that ship burning in the air around the time news reported it.

You saw it burning up in the air?  You mean, not in the vacuum of space?  Interesting.  So how do you know it was in space?  Furthermore, how do you know why it was burning up, or that the thing you saw was a space station?  Perhaps it was an experimental craft which, like Icarus, flew too close to the sun?

Quote

where do they go after they fly so high straight up that it can't be seen anymore?

I guess..... someplace you can't see?

Oh, wait, have you actually seen a shuttle launch?

-Erasmus

You're awesome... I like how you divide the quotes up and stuff. But I dont think I'm going to take that route. Anyways

1. Yes.. I mean space... Thanks for correcting me that little mistake.

2. I saw it burning in the sky.. it burned after entering the earth's atmosphere. Wich means it already passed the earth's atmosphere as it crashed on earth.

3. I've seen a shuttle launch if you mean seen it on anything from professional TV cameras to home movie cameras.  I havent seen it in in person. I've never been to Florida or Houston. I know they exsist and I've seen pictures and photos of Florida and Houston on TV and the Internet, I believe that those places exsist.

You're awesome...

Yup.  Once you've had Dutch you never go.... non-Dutch.

2. I saw it burning in the sky.. it burned after entering the earth's atmosphere. Wich means it already passed the earth's atmosphere as it crashed on earth.

Okay, so you saw it while it was in the atmosphere.  That's it.  You don't have any particularly good reason to know that the thing was in fact a space station except that NASA said so.

3. I've seen a shuttle launch if you mean seen it on anything from professional TV cameras to home movie cameras.  I havent seen it in in person.

That's too bad.  Since you said you've seen it go straight up, I would have considered it proof that the Earth is flat -- or at least, that it doesn't rotate.  You see, if the Earth were rotating, then the space shuttle would appear to follow a curved trajectory as its altitude increased.  Following an apparently straight path would cost extra delta-v.

-Erasmus

Quote from: "Yardstick2006"

I like how this theory is cerefully constructed so that any attempt at disprooving it is dismissed as an attemt to quash FE'ers.

Actually, I think that it's carefully constructed so that any attempt at disproving it is dismissed as erroneous' how is that different from the RE theory?

RE theory has PROOF.

Quote

the goverment could care less about the shape of the Earth.

That might be plausible, assuming that the Earth is round.  Actually, no, it's not: they need to know what shape the Earth is in order to know the fastest routes for sending their ICBMs and long-distance bombers around.  Come to think of it, that's a good reason why they'd hide the true shape of the Earth: so when Iran tries to lauch intercontinental missles at the U.S. (or whatever) they fall harmlessly in the Atlantic, or better yet, go over the Ice Wall.

Why hasnt the atmosphere drifted away? The ice wall cant keep the air in.

Quote

There have been PICTURES OF THE ROUND EARTH! I have seen them, we all have seen them.

Probably you are misinterpreting the pictures.  Don't feel bad; it's very common.

-Erasmus

THEY DID NOT HAVE PHOTOSHOP IN THE 1960'S!!

RE theory has PROOF.

Not that I've seen.

Why hasnt the atmosphere drifted away? The ice wall cant keep the air in.

It is trying probably, but the earth is accelerating upwards fast enough that it always "catches" it.

Kinda like on a round earth; the net relative acceleration between the earth and the atmosphere is 0. All the other component accelerations don't really matter.

THEY DID NOT HAVE PHOTOSHOP IN THE 1960'S!!

What are you trying to say? That you can't possibly fake a photograph without photoshop? To that I simply say: "You are wrong."

RE theory has PROOF.

Right, that's what I said.  It's carefully constructed so that it agrees with all the evidence (that's what proof is in science, right?)  How is that different from what FE's got?

Quote from: "Erasmus"

Quote

There have been PICTURES OF THE ROUND EARTH! I have seen them, we all have seen them.

Probably you are misinterpreting the pictures.  Don't feel bad; it's very common.

-Erasmus

THEY DID NOT HAVE PHOTOSHOP IN THE 1960'S!!

You must have misread me.  I didn't say, "You didn't realize that the pictures were fake", although perhaps many of them are.  I said "You are misinterpreting them."  I can see how you'd confuse the two sentences as they are very similar in appearance: they are both made with black letters from the same alphabet, forming English phrases, displayed on a gray background.  Of  course, the similarities end there.

-Erasmus