Mythbusters did the moon landing

  • 387 Replies
  • 54764 Views
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #360 on: January 17, 2009, 03:01:21 AM »
Exactly
There could very well be people inside in either of the theories... :-\

1) If it landed elsewhere on earth in secret, it would need pilots.

2) If it was destroyed before landing, they could very well evacuate or, if not, it would only confirm that NASA does not view the lives of its pawns worthy of preservation past the point of usefulness (which should come as no surprise to anyone).
Yet again you demonstrate your stupidity. If there is even a chance that they are killed, wouldn't they never be seen again?
Presumably. How is that a problem?

You make it sound like its not a problem. Is it?
"Harm None Do as Ye Will"

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #361 on: January 17, 2009, 08:30:57 AM »
No, why would it be? Do you think we have some bullshit theory about androids or something?
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #362 on: December 20, 2017, 12:37:20 PM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

*

sokarul

  • 17641
  • Discount Chemist
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #363 on: December 20, 2017, 01:03:03 PM »
Don't be dumb and stop bumping old threads.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #364 on: December 20, 2017, 01:06:06 PM »
Don't be dumb and stop bumping old threads.

Don't tell me how to be so good at what I do

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #365 on: December 21, 2017, 09:21:08 AM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Please provide your calculations showing the expectation of 1-4 photons.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #366 on: December 21, 2017, 09:22:32 AM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Please provide your calculations showing the expectation of 1-4 photons.

Read the links in my sig, I explain it fully.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #367 on: December 21, 2017, 12:51:14 PM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Please provide your calculations showing the expectation of 1-4 photons.

Read the links in my sig, I explain it fully.
And there you go lying again.
You are completely unable to justify your claim, so you just deflect.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #368 on: December 22, 2017, 07:52:07 AM »
Anyone can replicate this through study in math. I don't desire to handhold you in every thread.

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #369 on: December 22, 2017, 09:32:55 AM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Why all the exclamation marks? One not enough? Plus your statment is false.
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #370 on: December 22, 2017, 09:33:47 AM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Why all the exclamation marks? One not enough? Plus your statment is false.

Tradition!!! There are always 3 exclamation points.

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #371 on: December 22, 2017, 09:37:19 AM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Why all the exclamation marks? One not enough? Plus your statment is false.

Tradition!!! There are always 3 exclamation points.

Is there? Possibly in your own mind, but thatís missing the main point regarding the false statment you made. What you said is just not true, and Iím afraid thatís a fact.
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #372 on: December 22, 2017, 09:57:46 AM »
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Why all the exclamation marks? One not enough? Plus your statment is false.

Tradition!!! There are always 3 exclamation points.

Is there? Possibly in your own mind, but thatís missing the main point regarding the false statment you made. What you said is just not true, and Iím afraid thatís a fact.

Please demonstrate that, or you're just making stuff up.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #373 on: December 22, 2017, 12:08:29 PM »
Anyone can replicate this through study in math. I don't desire to handhold you in every thread.
Really? And what math do you use to come to your number?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #374 on: December 26, 2017, 07:40:49 AM »
Anyone can replicate this through study in math. I don't desire to handhold you in every thread.
Really? And what math do you use to come to your number?

Check my sig for links to all my studies and proofs.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #375 on: December 26, 2017, 12:17:13 PM »
Anyone can replicate this through study in math. I don't desire to handhold you in every thread.
Really? And what math do you use to come to your number?
Check my sig for links to all my studies and proofs.
I have checked. Your sig links to mountains of crap.
There are no studies to determine the shape of Earth and no proofs.

Nowhere in it do I see any link to any claim about the number of photons you would expect if shone a laser at the moon.

Now provide it here or shut up.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #376 on: December 26, 2017, 12:34:07 PM »
Anyone can replicate this through study in math. I don't desire to handhold you in every thread.
Really? And what math do you use to come to your number?
Check my sig for links to all my studies and proofs.
I have checked. Your sig links to mountains of crap.
There are no studies to determine the shape of Earth and no proofs.

Nowhere in it do I see any link to any claim about the number of photons you would expect if shone a laser at the moon.

Now provide it here or shut up.

You didn't look very hard, you can easily measure the shape of the earth with a level and a laser sight.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #377 on: December 26, 2017, 12:49:35 PM »
You didn't look very hard, you can easily measure the shape of the earth with a level and a laser sight.
And what the hell does that have to do with the topic at hand?

Here, let me remind you what you need to back up:
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Do you have any proof this is the "EXACT AMOUNT" you would measure under FET?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #378 on: December 26, 2017, 12:53:31 PM »
You didn't look very hard, you can easily measure the shape of the earth with a level and a laser sight.
And what the hell does that have to do with the topic at hand?

Here, let me remind you what you need to back up:
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!

Do you have any proof this is the "EXACT AMOUNT" you would measure under FET?

I do - it is what is measured.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #379 on: December 26, 2017, 12:55:24 PM »
Do you have any proof this is the "EXACT AMOUNT" you would measure under FET?
I do - it is what is measured.
So that is a no, you have no proof, even though when asked for calculations you claimed you explain it fully in your sig:
They bounced a laser off the moon and recorded 1-4 photons return back - THE EXACT AMOUNT you'd measure if the moon were closer, like in FET.
ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FE!!!
Please provide your calculations showing the expectation of 1-4 photons.
Read the links in my sig, I explain it fully.

So there you go lying yet again.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #380 on: December 26, 2017, 12:59:18 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #381 on: December 26, 2017, 01:13:53 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.
That isn't the question.  The question is why is that what you would EXPECT on a flat earth.
In other words you are saying there's some sort of predictive device, calculation that you would use before the experiment to give you such an expectation.
What is that device?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #382 on: December 26, 2017, 01:20:44 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.
That isn't the question.  The question is why is that what you would EXPECT on a flat earth.

Because the moon is closer, so more photons would be reflected than in RET.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #383 on: December 26, 2017, 01:26:10 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.
That isn't the question.  The question is why is that what you would EXPECT on a flat earth.

Because the moon is closer, so more photons would be reflected than in RET.
So what is the calculation you used?
What would be expected if the moon was farther away?
Numbers please.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #384 on: December 26, 2017, 01:27:14 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.
That isn't the question.  The question is why is that what you would EXPECT on a flat earth.

Because the moon is closer, so more photons would be reflected than in RET.
What would be expected if the moon was farther away?

Fewer returning photons. The amount would of course vary with how far away.

*

EvolvedMantisShrimp

  • 926
  • Physical Comedian
Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #385 on: December 26, 2017, 01:37:12 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.
That isn't the question.  The question is why is that what you would EXPECT on a flat earth.

Because the moon is closer, so more photons would be reflected than in RET.
What would be expected if the moon was farther away?

Fewer returning photons. The amount would of course vary with how far away.

Why is that?
Nullius in Verba

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #386 on: December 26, 2017, 01:42:57 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.
That isn't the question.  The question is why is that what you would EXPECT on a flat earth.

Because the moon is closer, so more photons would be reflected than in RET.
What would be expected if the moon was farther away?

Fewer returning photons. The amount would of course vary with how far away.
So you have present nothing to support your statement that the number returning is what would be expected on a flat earth.
Just another troll.  Too bad really.

Re: Mythbusters did the moon landing
« Reply #387 on: December 26, 2017, 07:32:00 PM »
Many amateurs have performed this test and found 1-4 photons reflected. You could attempt it yourself.
That is not the issue.
The issue is your claim that it is the exact amount you would expect in FET with a close moon.

Can you show that this is the case, and it is not in fact the amount you would expect in RET with a distant moon?

Because the moon is closer, so more photons would be reflected than in RET.
So you would expect more than 4 returning.

You claimed 4 was the exact amount you would expect under FET. PROVE IT or admit you were lying.