Looking for an intelligent argument. (Terminal Velocity)

  • 883 Replies
  • 150564 Views
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #480 on: August 22, 2008, 08:22:06 AM »
Prove me wrong.  O wait you can't.  Otherwise you would of.  The guy in a chair is neither free of forces or falling. 
O wait I did. You just can't read.


*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #481 on: August 22, 2008, 08:23:13 AM »
Prove me wrong.  O wait you can't.  Otherwise you would of.  The guy in a chair is neither free of forces or falling. 
O wait I did. You just can't read.



Give.it.up.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #482 on: August 22, 2008, 08:24:12 AM »
Quote
Yo,
Quote
1 = -1

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #483 on: August 22, 2008, 08:25:45 AM »
Quote
Yo,
Quote
1 = -1

So you gave up.  Good job.  Learn from your mistakes. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #484 on: August 22, 2008, 08:30:44 AM »
So you gave up.  Good job. Learn from your mistakes. 
Fantasy != Reality

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #485 on: August 22, 2008, 08:32:19 AM »
And people say I never back up my arguments. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #486 on: August 22, 2008, 08:34:17 AM »
It's true.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #487 on: August 22, 2008, 08:34:44 AM »
It's true.

I don't see you proving me wrong. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #488 on: August 22, 2008, 08:35:33 AM »
Quote
O wait I did. You just can't read.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #489 on: August 22, 2008, 08:38:55 AM »
Quote
O wait I did. You just can't read.

Going against physics does not prove your point.  I'm still waiting for an answer, how is a person in free fall when he is not free from forces? 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #490 on: August 22, 2008, 09:00:57 AM »
Going against physics does not prove your point.
Irony.

  I'm still waiting for an answer, how is a person in free fall when he is not free from forces? 
I said the person, on the ground, follows the geodesics indirectly.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2008, 10:19:10 AM by Jack. »

?

Dr Matrix

  • 4312
  • In Soviet Russia, Matrix enters you!
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #491 on: August 22, 2008, 12:16:50 PM »
I said the person, on the ground, follows the geodesics indirectly.

At the risk of getting sucked into this quote/flamewar... I think it would be fair to say that a person on the ground would follow a geodesic into the core of the Earth, were it not for the inter-atomic forces preventing him from doing so.  As a result, someone on the ground feels a contact force resisting the gravitation of the Earth.

Is that what you're both trying to get at, or have I missed the point here?
Quote from: Arthur Schopenhauer
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #492 on: August 22, 2008, 12:16:53 PM »
Going against physics does not prove your point.
Irony.

  I'm still waiting for an answer, how is a person in free fall when he is not free from forces? 
I said the person, on the ground, follows the geodesics indirectly.

Which still couldn't be further from proving your point.  Try again.  How is a guy sitting in a chair free falling?  Keep in mind you need to explain how he is free of forces.  
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #493 on: August 22, 2008, 12:19:32 PM »
I said the person, on the ground, follows the geodesics indirectly.

At the risk of getting sucked into this quote/flamewar... I think it would be fair to say that a person on the ground would follow a geodesic into the core of the Earth, were it not for the inter-atomic forces preventing him from doing so.  As a result, someone on the ground feels a contact force resisting the gravitation of the Earth.

Is that what you're both trying to get at, or have I missed the point here?

That’s what I am getting at.  He for some reason thinks that because the guy is trying to follow geodesics it some how means the guy is free of forces. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #494 on: August 22, 2008, 12:20:44 PM »
I think it would be fair to say that a person on the ground would follow a geodesic into the core of the Earth, were it not for the inter-atomic forces preventing him from doing so.

He is following a geodesic.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

Dr Matrix

  • 4312
  • In Soviet Russia, Matrix enters you!
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #495 on: August 22, 2008, 12:44:10 PM »
He is following a geodesic.

My understanding of a geodesic is that it's the path that a particle under no acceleration follows through space-time (curved or otherwise). If we agree that a man on the surface of the Earth feels a force from the ground, then he cannot be following a geodesic any more than a hovering helicopter can be said to be following a geodesic.

Is the problem that we have different definitions of what a geodesic is...?
Quote from: Arthur Schopenhauer
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #496 on: August 22, 2008, 12:52:56 PM »
He is following a geodesic.

My understanding of a geodesic is that it's the path that a particle under no acceleration follows through space-time (curved or otherwise). If we agree that a man on the surface of the Earth feels a force from the ground, then he cannot be following a geodesic any more than a hovering helicopter can be said to be following a geodesic.

Is the problem that we have different definitions of what a geodesic is...?

Its the path with no force applied.  Acceleration is involved. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

Dr Matrix

  • 4312
  • In Soviet Russia, Matrix enters you!
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #497 on: August 22, 2008, 01:02:01 PM »
Its the path with no force applied.  Acceleration is involved. 

I should have specified no external acceleration (=> force), sorry, getting sloppy in my old age.
Quote from: Arthur Schopenhauer
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #498 on: August 22, 2008, 01:08:50 PM »
Its the path with no force applied.  Acceleration is involved. 

I should have specified no external acceleration (=> force), sorry, getting sloppy in my old age.

Then yes you are correct.  The problem is Potentiall has no idea what he is talking about.  The only thing he knows about GR is what he has read on here. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #499 on: August 22, 2008, 05:25:47 PM »
We are all trying to follow the geodesics into the Earth.  However, the Earth, due to mechanical resistance, prevents us from doing this, which results in our continual physical upwards acceleration.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #500 on: August 22, 2008, 05:30:43 PM »
We are all trying to follow the geodesics into the Earth.  However, the Earth, due to mechanical resistance, prevents us from doing this, which results in our continual physical upwards acceleration.

Which is cancel out by said acceleration from gravitation.  Otherwise we would accelerate off the earth. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #501 on: August 22, 2008, 05:41:05 PM »
Uh, no, our path along the geodesic is canceled out by our acceleration.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #502 on: August 22, 2008, 05:42:37 PM »
Uh, no, our path along the geodesic is canceled out by our acceleration.

That's what I said. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #503 on: August 22, 2008, 05:43:29 PM »
No, it is not:
Which is cancel out by said acceleration from gravitation. 


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #504 on: August 22, 2008, 05:44:09 PM »
No, it is not:
Which is cancel out by said acceleration from gravitation. 


And how does gravitation cause acceleration? 
« Last Edit: August 22, 2008, 05:46:20 PM by sokarul »
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #505 on: August 22, 2008, 05:45:17 PM »
English, please.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #506 on: August 22, 2008, 05:46:48 PM »
English, please.
I could actually believe you couldn't comprehend that.  I took off the "s" for you. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #507 on: August 22, 2008, 06:01:28 PM »
Any chance I get to make fun of your mastery of English is a moment of pure elation.



No, it is not:
Which is cancel out by said acceleration from gravitation. 


And how does gravitation cause acceleration? 

We are all trying to follow the geodesics into the Earth.  However, the Earth, due to mechanical resistance, prevents us from doing this, which results in our continual physical upwards acceleration.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #508 on: August 22, 2008, 06:04:09 PM »
This is a debate forum.  And as far as I've seen, no evidence that the RE can offer seems to be good enough.

Exactly.  I'm glad you recognize that REers tend to just embarrass themselves again and again.  They should really just stop trying, ya mean?
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Looking for an intelligent argument.
« Reply #509 on: August 22, 2008, 07:56:43 PM »
Any chance I get to make fun of your mastery of English is a moment of pure elation.



No, it is not:
Which is cancel out by said acceleration from gravitation. 


And how does gravitation cause acceleration? 

We are all trying to follow the geodesics into the Earth.  However, the Earth, due to mechanical resistance, prevents us from doing this, which results in our continual physical upwards acceleration.

So I ask, why did you say no to a true statement? 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.