A question for the REers.

Ok. REers are hypocrites, another win for FE!

He might be a hypocrite, but at least he has a real name.

Sorry for the unlock and necrobump, everyone, but we appear to have some REers who believe RET is flawless again! Be ashamed, you two, as you look upon this mountain of RE fail.

Sorry for the unlock and necrobump, everyone, but we appear to have some REers who believe RET is flawless again! Be ashamed, you two, as you look upon this mountain of RE fail.

Until you prove nasa is a fake, we have real proof the earth is round.

Unlike FE'ers, who have no real proof.   

Quote from: General Douchebag on October 11, 2008, 03:16:52 PM

Sorry for the unlock and necrobump, everyone, but we appear to have some REers who believe RET is flawless again! Be ashamed, you two, as you look upon this mountain of RE fail.

Until you prove nasa is a fake, we have real proof the earth is round.

Unlike FE'ers, who have no real proof.   

The earth is flat.

Quote from: Oom19 on October 11, 2008, 03:53:14 PM

Quote from: General Douchebag on October 11, 2008, 03:16:52 PM

Sorry for the unlock and necrobump, everyone, but we appear to have some REers who believe RET is flawless again! Be ashamed, you two, as you look upon this mountain of RE fail.

Until you prove nasa is a fake, we have real proof the earth is round.

Unlike FE'ers, who have no real proof.   

The earth is flat.

give reputable proof that the earth is flat, or give reputable proof that nasa is lying, and I will beleive.

Conceptual explanation of gravity by mass in relation with space-time. Profit.


(Clearer than the previous)

Quote from: DrainCoverLover on October 11, 2008, 03:54:59 PM

Quote from: Oom19 on October 11, 2008, 03:53:14 PM

Quote from: General Douchebag on October 11, 2008, 03:16:52 PM

Sorry for the unlock and necrobump, everyone, but we appear to have some REers who believe RET is flawless again! Be ashamed, you two, as you look upon this mountain of RE fail.

Until you prove nasa is a fake, we have real proof the earth is round.

Unlike FE'ers, who have no real proof.   

The earth is flat.

give reputable proof that the earth is flat, or give reputable proof that nasa is lying, and I will beleive.

Look out your window.  What do you see?

i see a round earth

No, you don't.

I see dead people

No one saw my videos 

Sorry man, my electronic survival instincts prevent me from following links to other websites from forums

It's only 2 youtube videos, you can trust me, I ain't in the conspiracy (yet) 

How does gravity work again?

So gravity works as the Disk Earth accelerates up at 9.8m\s^2..??
Genius...

It could do (for the most part, but I don't want to spoil your fun by telling you how it doesn't) - see the Gravity sticky

Quote from: General Douchebag on August 13, 2008, 02:20:00 AM

How does gravity work again?

So gravity works as the Disk Earth accelerates up at 9.8m\s^2..??
Genius...

No, there's no way gravity could work like that, that's inertia..!!
Moron...

I wanted to know, and there's no RE FAQ (how impolite of you) and I searched. Also, I want a laugh. How does gravity work again? Until you can answer, see Engy's sig.

(I am not reading all 100-something posts)

when mass warps the space-time fabric

(I am not reading all 100-something posts)

when mass warps the space-time fabric

Really? So photons don't interact gravitationally?

Quote from: Kingcosmo7 on October 15, 2008, 01:52:14 PM

(I am not reading all 100-something posts)

when mass warps the space-time fabric

Really? So photons don't interact gravitationally?

I never said that.

Quote from: Osama  bin Laden on October 15, 2008, 02:10:47 PM

Quote from: Kingcosmo7 on October 15, 2008, 01:52:14 PM

(I am not reading all 100-something posts)

when mass warps the space-time fabric

Really? So photons don't interact gravitationally?

I never said that.

How does gravity work then?

Bring on gravity sticky II: attack of the clones

Quote from: Kingcosmo7 on October 15, 2008, 03:12:44 PM

Quote from: Osama  bin Laden on October 15, 2008, 02:10:47 PM

Quote from: Kingcosmo7 on October 15, 2008, 01:52:14 PM

(I am not reading all 100-something posts)

when mass warps the space-time fabric

Really? So photons don't interact gravitationally?

I never said that.

How does gravity work then?

Just because i never said it doesn't mean its true. once an object is in motion it remains in motion. even photons. So light has a path, and that path is on the space-time fabric. when the space-time fabric warps, so does the path of light.

So in RE there are three separate types of physics? And FE is stupid?

I meant relativistic physics (large scale), Newtonian physics (small scale), and theoretical physics (subatomic scale) because all have different theories on everything.

They are different- yes. What makes them wrong? Newtonian physics is inaccurate only because it is a simplification of GR. Newton's formula are simplified leaving out unnecessary variables for relativistic circumstances. They correctly model the apparent force of gravity for 'normal' conditions, but GR applied to normal conditions would get the same result. GR is an improvement to Newtonian calculations, not a replacement.

Economics Example:
Where the function C(q) evaluates cost of manufacturing for q quantity of products produced:
C'(q) = MC(q)*1
Marginal Cost is The derivative times dx. dx = 1 by the definition of marginal ie incremental. Therefore it can be elimated from the equation. If dx were to change we would need to put it back into the equation.

Newtons' laws approximate the effects of gravity (not a force but an observed phenomenon) in standard conditions. GR is a much deeper understanding of these laws.

Really? So photons don't interact gravitationally?

A(mass) -> B(gravitation) does not mean
C(energy) !-> B(gravitation).

Fallacy in your assumption.

A(mass) -> B(gravitation) does not mean
C(energy) !-> B(gravitation).

Fallacy in your assumption.

So he gave an incomplete definition of gravitation? I was looking for a definition of what it is, not one of the ways in which it can act.

(I am not reading all 100-something posts)
when mass warps the space-time fabric

Isn't that GR, anyway?

I think it's more accurate to say "mass-energy warps space time" rather than making it exclusive to mass - photons deform space time as well, for instance, even though they have zero rest mass.

That, while being a better description, is still gravitation.

Momentum, along with energy, also bends space-time.