nasas motive

  • 28 Replies
  • 6917 Views
nasas motive
« on: August 13, 2008, 02:01:12 AM »
THERE IS NO MOTIVE!  you guys cant even come up with a motive in your dumb little FAQ.  "probably money"   ya ok, that makes sense considering it would cost them billions to fake something that doesnt even matter.  and how could it be money, how are they going to make money doing this? exactly.  please save your pathetic response of "lurk more" because you do not have a response.  you guys are idiots.

?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2008, 02:38:31 AM »
Read the FAQ.

*

lolz at trollz

  • 501
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2008, 03:15:47 AM »
They do it to hide the real truth.  The truth that even the admins on this forum want to hide from you.  Beyond the ice wall, there is not nothing, there is a lollipop forest.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Video proof that the Earth is flat!

Run run, as fast as you can, you can't catch me cos I'm in the lollipop forest and you can't get there!

?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2008, 03:30:53 AM »
Proof of said lollipop forest?

?

jackcarr

  • 56
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2008, 03:33:21 AM »


Artists impression.

Re: nasas motive
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2008, 04:03:13 AM »
Read the FAQ.

hmm, i have read the faq, and if you could read you would have known that by now.  thanks for your worthless post, dumbass

*

lolz at trollz

  • 501
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2008, 04:06:18 AM »
Proof of said lollipop forest?





Real lollipops from the forrest. 

There's no may mere humans could have built lollipops that big, they grew in the forest. 

here is a map of the forest:

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Video proof that the Earth is flat!

Run run, as fast as you can, you can't catch me cos I'm in the lollipop forest and you can't get there!

*

lolz at trollz

  • 501
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2008, 04:12:57 AM »
The lollipop forest is the only true explanation, how else do you get millions of people to join hte conspiricy.  5 minuites in hte lollipop forest and they are loyal to the cause.  No amount of money of fame could ever compare!  Also, it explains the funding, how many lolliops are sold every day?  millions?  how could they be faked?  Have you ever seen a lollipop be made?  No, because they grow in the forest. 
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Video proof that the Earth is flat!

Run run, as fast as you can, you can't catch me cos I'm in the lollipop forest and you can't get there!

Re: nasas motive
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2008, 04:14:34 AM »
now its all starting to make sense...

?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2008, 07:43:21 PM »
Pictures don't count as proof.

Re: nasas motive
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2008, 12:00:47 AM »
looks like RE wins again.  whenever they dont have a clue its always "lurk moar", "FAQ", or they change the subject.

 ;D

?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2008, 02:04:27 AM »
Could you explain why you "won"? There is plenty of proof of FE, you ignoring it doesn't make it disappear.

?

jackcarr

  • 56
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2008, 02:21:38 AM »
Could you explain why you "won"? There is plenty of proof of FE, you ignoring it doesn't make it disappear.

Give me said proof please.

?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2008, 02:25:00 AM »

Re: nasas motive
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2008, 02:53:16 AM »
The lollipop forest is the only true explanation, how else do you get millions of people to join hte conspiricy.  5 minuites in hte lollipop forest and they are loyal to the cause.  No amount of money of fame could ever compare!  Also, it explains the funding, how many lolliops are sold every day?  millions?  how could they be faked?  Have you ever seen a lollipop be made?  No, because they grow in the forest. 

This explains everything! The lollipop-forest motive might actually seem reasonable.

?

funkcmc

  • 30
  • +0/-0
  • wappa
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2008, 02:54:21 AM »
I just read what you posted and can take this direct quote

"The polar projection of the flat earth creates obvious discrepancies with known geography, particularly the farther south you go. Figure 54 inadvertantly illustrates this problem. The Zetetic map has a severly squashed South America and Africa, and Australia and New Zealand in the middle of the Pacific. I think that by the 19th century people would have noticed if Australia and Africa were thousands of miles further apart than expected, let alone if Africa was wider than it was long!"

Your counter? if it's "FAQ" can you paste it for me?
When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

?

cbarnett97

  • 2746
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2008, 02:58:03 AM »
Proof of said lollipop forest?





Real lollipops from the forrest. 

There's no may mere humans could have built lollipops that big, they grew in the forest. 

here is a map of the forest:


Where are the guards to prevent the truth from getting out?
Only 2 things are infinite the universe and human stupidity, but I am not sure about the former.

?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2008, 03:37:37 AM »
I just read what you posted and can take this direct quote

"The polar projection of the flat earth creates obvious discrepancies with known geography, particularly the farther south you go. Figure 54 inadvertantly illustrates this problem. The Zetetic map has a severly squashed South America and Africa, and Australia and New Zealand in the middle of the Pacific. I think that by the 19th century people would have noticed if Australia and Africa were thousands of miles further apart than expected, let alone if Africa was wider than it was long!"

Your counter? if it's "FAQ" can you paste it for me?
They are wrong.

*

lolz at trollz

  • 501
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2008, 04:13:52 AM »
Where are the guards to prevent the truth from getting out?

Very few guards are needed, anyone seeing the forest pretty much instantly joins the conspiricy. 
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Video proof that the Earth is flat!

Run run, as fast as you can, you can't catch me cos I'm in the lollipop forest and you can't get there!

?

funkcmc

  • 30
  • +0/-0
  • wappa
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2008, 04:24:18 AM »
They are wrong.

A great FE reply once more, victory for RE! haha I love these forums!
When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2008, 04:34:20 AM »
They are wrong.

A great FE reply once more, victory for RE! haha I love these forums!
Wrong again. Victory for FE.

?

funkcmc

  • 30
  • +0/-0
  • wappa
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2008, 04:36:47 AM »
Do you have evidence for a FE victory?  FE doesn't even exist so how can it "win"?
When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2008, 04:39:26 AM »
THERE IS NO MOTIVE!  you guys cant even come up with a motive in your dumb little FAQ.  "probably money"   ya ok, that makes sense considering it would cost them billions to fake something that doesnt even matter.  and how could it be money, how are they going to make money doing this? exactly.  please save your pathetic response of "lurk more" because you do not have a response.  you guys are idiots.

How could they make money?

Submit budget with intense scientific justification for space exploration, space-related equipment, and other miscellaneous costs to Congress; await approval; once budget is formulated and paid, do the necessary work to fabricate and/or complete the plan. Since the costs are realistic, and NASA doesn't really do what it claims to do in the budget, it profits whatever is left over.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

funkcmc

  • 30
  • +0/-0
  • wappa
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2008, 04:56:35 AM »
How can people make money? Pretend that the earth is actually flat, write books with no evidence or real structure and create websites resulting in thousands of hits per day.  That's a better money making idea in my opinion.
When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

?

jackcarr

  • 56
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2008, 06:47:05 AM »
How can people make money? Pretend that the earth is actually flat, write books with no evidence or real structure and create websites resulting in thousands of hits per day.  That's a better money making idea in my opinion.

lol

?

cbarnett97

  • 2746
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #25 on: August 14, 2008, 11:58:20 AM »
THERE IS NO MOTIVE!  you guys cant even come up with a motive in your dumb little FAQ.  "probably money"   ya ok, that makes sense considering it would cost them billions to fake something that doesnt even matter.  and how could it be money, how are they going to make money doing this? exactly.  please save your pathetic response of "lurk more" because you do not have a response.  you guys are idiots.

How could they make money?

Submit budget with intense scientific justification for space exploration, space-related equipment, and other miscellaneous costs to Congress; await approval; once budget is formulated and paid, do the necessary work to fabricate and/or complete the plan. Since the costs are realistic, and NASA doesn't really do what it claims to do in the budget, it profits whatever is left over.
good thing for NASA there are no watchdog groups out there to look for those exact scenarios......

Oh wait there are
Only 2 things are infinite the universe and human stupidity, but I am not sure about the former.

?

FELUNATIC

  • 77
  • +0/-0
Re: nasas motive
« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2008, 12:17:05 PM »
Could you explain why you "won"? There is plenty of proof of FE, you ignoring it doesn't make it disappear.

Could you actually give poof about FE which is observable and testable (which have been posted in a science magazine such as nature)? I haven't seen proof and I've read the faq and about 100 threads or so

?

MessiahOfFire

Re: nasas motive
« Reply #27 on: August 14, 2008, 07:39:58 PM »
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/index.htm

May I ask you who wrote that? Well you already know its Samuel Birley Rowbotham.

So, how is that (the link to the online version of his book) worth as proof if he is not even a scientist?
How can that be proof if no other scientists around the world agree with him?

 :-*

?

MessiahOfFire

Re: nasas motive
« Reply #28 on: August 14, 2008, 07:46:32 PM »
How could they make money?

Submit budget with intense scientific justification for space exploration, space-related equipment, and other miscellaneous costs to Congress; await approval; once budget is formulated and paid, do the necessary work to fabricate and/or complete the plan. Since the costs are realistic, and NASA doesn't really do what it claims to do in the budget, it profits whatever is left over.

Well, so you are saying that the government invests all this money into something and doesn't send specialists in or certain groups of people in to make sure all the money is being used properly? You think they just throw what ever money NASA needs at them and thats it, leave them alone and don't check up on anything? I am 100% certain that they have their system of checks or what ever to keep track of EVERYTHING.

If the majority of money was not being used to make and research things by NASA, and then the money was sent off to certain peoples wallets, the government would straight away find out. They do know how to track money, you know?