.99999 does not equal 1

  • 856 Replies
  • 151299 Views
?

CognitiveDissonance001

  • 41
  • My god, it's full of Trolls . . .
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #390 on: August 19, 2008, 07:39:24 PM »
So now you guys are saying that 0.8888.. does equal 0.9999..

You guys should take math 101.

Where. Tell me where anyone besides you got that impression, and we'll walk you through it using small words.

CD
With every post to the Flat Earth Forum,
William of Occam kills a kitten.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #391 on: August 19, 2008, 07:50:26 PM »
Don't sign your posts unless you're Diego.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

mwahaha

Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #392 on: August 19, 2008, 07:58:22 PM »


I am Diego.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #393 on: August 19, 2008, 08:06:08 PM »


I am Prego.

And children, with the changing of the 2 letters, the truth is out.

Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #394 on: August 19, 2008, 08:09:24 PM »
Ha ha! A Mexican, Muffz? How desperate were you? :D

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #395 on: August 19, 2008, 08:10:23 PM »
They tend to knock white women up. It's part of nature. Like ducks being strangled by those plastic pop can connectors. Nature.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #396 on: August 19, 2008, 08:16:59 PM »
0.111... = 1/9
0.222... = 2/9
0.333... = 3/9
0.444... = 4/9
0.555... = 5/9
0.666... = 6/9
0.777... = 7/9
0.888... = 8/9
0.999... = 9/9 = 1
1.111... = 1 1/9

etc...

Except you skip 1.0000...  ::)

?

mwahaha

Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #397 on: August 19, 2008, 08:21:16 PM »
Did y'all not read the proof I gave you? I'M NOT PREGO!

EDIT: Also, two-dimensional figures cannot knock three-dimensional figures up.

Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #398 on: August 19, 2008, 08:22:54 PM »
I just noticed the sloth in that picture...

Hmmmmm...maybe my initial assumption was incorrect...

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #399 on: August 19, 2008, 08:23:50 PM »
Seriously muffz, just go watch Dr. Phil and let him speak sweet nothings to your empty soul.
You should've recognized the math in this thread as the familiar, "no girls allowed" sign.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #400 on: August 19, 2008, 08:27:38 PM »
Actual the lack of reference to cooking, cleaning or sewing is the no girls allowed sign.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #401 on: August 19, 2008, 09:20:41 PM »
Actual the lack of reference to cooking, cleaning or sewing is the no girls allowed sign.

I lol'd.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10061
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #402 on: August 19, 2008, 09:55:13 PM »
0.111... = 1/9
0.222... = 2/9
0.333... = 3/9
0.444... = 4/9
0.555... = 5/9
0.666... = 6/9
0.777... = 7/9
0.888... = 8/9
0.999... = 9/9 = 1
1.111... = 1 1/9

etc...

Except you skip 1.0000...  ::)

1.000... EQUALS ONE YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE.

sorry.  maths is serious business.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #403 on: August 19, 2008, 10:07:03 PM »
No, your pattern skips one.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #404 on: August 19, 2008, 10:10:36 PM »
his pattern skips an infinite amount of numbers between each number. As does every pattern on earth.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #405 on: August 19, 2008, 10:16:30 PM »
A pattern that skips an obvious step is not a pattern.
Ie a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, k is not the pattern implied.

Trekky is trying to imply a decaredundo pattern, ie 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0 but instead delivers a disrupted pattern, otherwise known as an anomaly, something that should raise questions and desire an explanation. So I raise the question, please explain why you skip 1.000000.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #406 on: August 19, 2008, 10:45:13 PM »
A pattern that skips an obvious step is not a pattern.
Ie a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, k is not the pattern implied.

Trekky is trying to imply a decaredundo pattern, ie 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0 but instead delivers a disrupted pattern, otherwise known as an anomaly, something that should raise questions and desire an explanation. So I raise the question, please explain why you skip 1.000000.

The pattern is that one is added to each digit each time. Adding one to nine gives ten.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #407 on: August 19, 2008, 10:46:06 PM »
Exactly, it should go
...
0.9999
1.0000
1.1111
...

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #408 on: August 19, 2008, 10:58:26 PM »
Exactly, it should go
...
0.9999
1.0000
1.1111
...

No.

0.999... = limn→∞ (9 * 10-1) + (9 * 10-2) + (9 * 10-3) + ... + (9 * 10-n)

Adding one to each digit gives:

= limn→∞ (10 * 10-1) + (10 * 10-2) + (10 * 10-3) + ... + (10 * 10-n)

= limn→∞ 100 + 10-1 + 10-2 + ... + 10-n+1

Now, if we let m = n-1, then:

limn→∞ m = limn→∞ (n-1) = ∞

Such that the equation above becomes:

= limm→∞ 100 + 10-1 + 10-2 + ... + 10-m

= 1.111...
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #409 on: August 19, 2008, 11:03:44 PM »
Sounds like a straightforward pattern  ::) ::) ::)

Occam clearly sides with me, I do not need an absurd amount of contradictory math to define the correct pattern:
...
.999
1.000
1.111
...

Only an idiot would think 0.999... = 1, are you an idiot?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #410 on: August 19, 2008, 11:07:25 PM »
Sounds like a straightforward pattern  ::) ::) ::)

Occam clearly sides with me, I do not need an absurd amount of contradictory math to define the correct pattern:
...
.999
1.000
1.111
...

Only an idiot would think 0.999... = 1, are you an idiot?
Your pattern is redundant.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #411 on: August 19, 2008, 11:08:52 PM »
If you mean it repeats itself over and over, I would agree, it is a pattern.
lol@trekky's, it skips 1!!!

?

Herodotus

Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #412 on: August 19, 2008, 11:23:55 PM »
First, I would like to thank all involved with the thread/ site as I have not been so entertained for some time. To all of the flat earth opponents: Having read alot of the posts, I think that #1. most, if not all, have a great grasp on the fundamentals of the Calculus, as this particular posting got my attention. And #2 I think that we may be being duped here. Call me a conspiracy theorist but me thinks that this may be a prank executed at the highest levels of physics/ mathematics undergraduate professorship. I mean seriously... with whom are you doing intelectual battle? Think for a second how devious the plan would be for a group of elder acedemics to start such a ridiculous  
 page and watch their students systematically destroying such insane stupidity as 0.999... doesn't equal one. As if people with the ability to start and maintain a website had the inability to understand limits, the fundamental basis of Calculus. C'mon guys... whats next? If I might suggest, from a fan's standpoint, I would personally love to a see a website that proffers the existence of the "Creationist / 5000 year old earth" and sit back to watch the sparks fly. Of course we wouldn't get as many math students, but please, offer the idea up to your particular university's geology professors. Their students will also surely have a field day. To those feeling like they are out of place and should be doing something useful with their precious time on the net, I am just as guilty as having far too much free time as you for having visited a "Flat Earth" webpage. Having said that, I also haven't been as entertained in many a moon. So thank you to all of the contributors. And while the "Flat earth faithful" will surely lambast this post... I would like to give a slight wink and nod to you guys, as alot of these posters have had a chance to truly question what they have been taught and why it may, or may not make logical sense to them. Long live the flat earth! For at least another five thousand!!!

?

trig

  • 2240
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #413 on: August 19, 2008, 11:28:37 PM »
Sounds like a straightforward pattern  ::) ::) ::)

Occam clearly sides with me, I do not need an absurd amount of contradictory math to define the correct pattern:
...
.999
1.000
1.111
...

Only an idiot would think 0.999... = 1, are you an idiot?
Now I have seen it all. Occam's Razor has nothing to with Mathematics! Theories and hypothesis are the center of Occam's Razor, but have no part in Mathematics! If two theorems have the same predicting power (whatever that may be in maths) then the two theorems are true! In fact, every theorem is true.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11857
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #414 on: August 19, 2008, 11:36:05 PM »
First, I would like to thank all involved with the thread/ site as I have not been so entertained for some time. To all of the flat earth opponents: Having read alot of the posts, I think that #1. most, if not all, have a great grasp on the fundamentals of the Calculus, as this particular posting got my attention. And #2 I think that we may be being duped here. Call me a conspiracy theorist but me thinks that this may be a prank executed at the highest levels of physics/ mathematics undergraduate professorship. I mean seriously... with whom are you doing intelectual battle? Think for a second how devious the plan would be for a group of elder acedemics to start such a ridiculous  
 page and watch their students systematically destroying such insane stupidity as 0.999... doesn't equal one. As if people with the ability to start and maintain a website had the inability to understand limits, the fundamental basis of Calculus. C'mon guys... whats next? If I might suggest, from a fan's standpoint, I would personally love to a see a website that proffers the existence of the "Creationist / 5000 year old earth" and sit back to watch the sparks fly. Of course we wouldn't get as many math students, but please, offer the idea up to your particular university's geology professors. Their students will also surely have a field day. To those feeling like they are out of place and should be doing something useful with their precious time on the net, I am just as guilty as having far too much free time as you for having visited a "Flat Earth" webpage. Having said that, I also haven't been as entertained in many a moon. So thank you to all of the contributors. And while the "Flat earth faithful" will surely lambast this post... I would like to give a slight wink and nod to you guys, as alot of these posters have had a chance to truly question what they have been taught and why it may, or may not make logical sense to them. Long live the flat earth! For at least another five thousand!!!


It's 6000 dolt. 

LURK MOAR!!1!!

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=21424.0

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6258
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #415 on: August 19, 2008, 11:56:12 PM »
First, I would like to thank all involved with the thread/ site as I have not been so entertained for some time. To all of the flat earth opponents: Having read alot of the posts, I think that #1. most, if not all, have a great grasp on the fundamentals of the Calculus, as this particular posting got my attention. And #2 I think that we may be being duped here. Call me a conspiracy theorist but me thinks that this may be a prank executed at the highest levels of physics/ mathematics undergraduate professorship. I mean seriously... with whom are you doing intelectual battle? Think for a second how devious the plan would be for a group of elder acedemics to start such a ridiculous  
 page and watch their students systematically destroying such insane stupidity as 0.999... doesn't equal one. As if people with the ability to start and maintain a website had the inability to understand limits, the fundamental basis of Calculus. C'mon guys... whats next? If I might suggest, from a fan's standpoint, I would personally love to a see a website that proffers the existence of the "Creationist / 5000 year old earth" and sit back to watch the sparks fly. Of course we wouldn't get as many math students, but please, offer the idea up to your particular university's geology professors. Their students will also surely have a field day. To those feeling like they are out of place and should be doing something useful with their precious time on the net, I am just as guilty as having far too much free time as you for having visited a "Flat Earth" webpage. Having said that, I also haven't been as entertained in many a moon. So thank you to all of the contributors. And while the "Flat earth faithful" will surely lambast this post... I would like to give a slight wink and nod to you guys, as alot of these posters have had a chance to truly question what they have been taught and why it may, or may not make logical sense to them. Long live the flat earth! For at least another five thousand!!!

I read your book. Very nice.  :)

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #416 on: August 20, 2008, 12:20:08 AM »
First, I would like to thank all involved with the thread/ site as I have not been so entertained for some time. To all of the flat earth opponents: Having read alot of the posts, I think that #1. most, if not all, have a great grasp on the fundamentals of the Calculus, as this particular posting got my attention. And #2 I think that we may be being duped here. Call me a conspiracy theorist but me thinks that this may be a prank executed at the highest levels of physics/ mathematics undergraduate professorship. I mean seriously... with whom are you doing intelectual battle? Think for a second how devious the plan would be for a group of elder acedemics to start such a ridiculous  
 page and watch their students systematically destroying such insane stupidity as 0.999... doesn't equal one. As if people with the ability to start and maintain a website had the inability to understand limits, the fundamental basis of Calculus. C'mon guys... whats next? If I might suggest, from a fan's standpoint, I would personally love to a see a website that proffers the existence of the "Creationist / 5000 year old earth" and sit back to watch the sparks fly. Of course we wouldn't get as many math students, but please, offer the idea up to your particular university's geology professors. Their students will also surely have a field day. To those feeling like they are out of place and should be doing something useful with their precious time on the net, I am just as guilty as having far too much free time as you for having visited a "Flat Earth" webpage. Having said that, I also haven't been as entertained in many a moon. So thank you to all of the contributors. And while the "Flat earth faithful" will surely lambast this post... I would like to give a slight wink and nod to you guys, as alot of these posters have had a chance to truly question what they have been taught and why it may, or may not make logical sense to them. Long live the flat earth! For at least another five thousand!!!

Oh, I am aware that Narcberry is trolling. I just have nothing better to do than to play along.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #417 on: August 20, 2008, 12:24:55 AM »
18 pages...

0.99999 != 1
0.999...  = 1

[NOTE: THIS POST WILL BE SPAMMABLE SHOULD STUPIDITY CONTINUES BEYOND PAGE 18]

*

Wendy

  • 18492
  • I laugh cus you fake
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #418 on: August 20, 2008, 12:56:13 AM »
ITT: crybabies whine over stupid people who don't know how basic mathematics work.
Here's an explanation for ya. Lurk moar. Every single point you brought up has been posted, reposted, debated and debunked. There is a search function on this forum, and it is very easy to use.

*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10061
Re: .99999 does not equal 1
« Reply #419 on: August 20, 2008, 07:23:18 AM »
First, I would like to thank all involved with the thread/ site as I have not been so entertained for some time. To all of the flat earth opponents: Having read alot of the posts, I think that #1. most, if not all, have a great grasp on the fundamentals of the Calculus, as this particular posting got my attention. And #2 I think that we may be being duped here. Call me a conspiracy theorist but me thinks that this may be a prank executed at the highest levels of physics/ mathematics undergraduate professorship. I mean seriously... with whom are you doing intelectual battle? Think for a second how devious the plan would be for a group of elder acedemics to start such a ridiculous  
 page and watch their students systematically destroying such insane stupidity as 0.999... doesn't equal one. As if people with the ability to start and maintain a website had the inability to understand limits, the fundamental basis of Calculus. C'mon guys... whats next? If I might suggest, from a fan's standpoint, I would personally love to a see a website that proffers the existence of the "Creationist / 5000 year old earth" and sit back to watch the sparks fly. Of course we wouldn't get as many math students, but please, offer the idea up to your particular university's geology professors. Their students will also surely have a field day. To those feeling like they are out of place and should be doing something useful with their precious time on the net, I am just as guilty as having far too much free time as you for having visited a "Flat Earth" webpage. Having said that, I also haven't been as entertained in many a moon. So thank you to all of the contributors. And while the "Flat earth faithful" will surely lambast this post... I would like to give a slight wink and nod to you guys, as alot of these posters have had a chance to truly question what they have been taught and why it may, or may not make logical sense to them. Long live the flat earth! For at least another five thousand!!!

Quote from: Chrissetti
A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. You must get a proper bitch-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the fuck did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well. Congratualtions, or not, actually not. Get a life right now. I found a cheap life on eBay, but cheap lives are rare. Well, good luck in finding one. Not! Okay go have fun, but I wasn't meaning that. So go sit in the corner in your house. I do not care which, just stay there and rot. If you are not in a place with a corner, then lucky you. Find one if you can. There is no other option because I said so. Now if you pity yourself for reading this like most do, then do something productive and useful to the environment. My goodness.So SAD SO SADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!