Outcome: which is better in the long run?

  • 20 Replies
  • 3282 Views
?

GreenEarth

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« on: June 30, 2008, 09:01:27 PM »
Either way, if RE wins Humans will advance infinitely, expanding across the galaxy, the universe. maybe even beyond. If FE wins, Humanity will die slowly with resource over use, Earth and Humanity will die, there is no where to run afterall. What goes around comes around.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2008, 09:03:25 PM »
Is this some perverse form of Pascal's wager?
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2008, 09:03:37 PM »
Its the end of the world as we know it...and I feel fine.

?

GreenEarth

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2008, 09:04:03 PM »
yeah it is

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2008, 09:48:03 PM »
If the disk of the earth is infinite there's still the tantalizing possibility of exploration beyond the ice wall.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2008, 09:49:40 PM »
But the temperature would be tremendously cold.  Plus could we live without natural light?

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2008, 09:52:34 PM »
Probably. We could use some of the useless data NASA has developed.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2008, 09:55:57 PM »
I think we could get around the problem with temperature.  And it's entirely possible that there are other tiny suns orbiting above other sections of the disk, allowing for the possibility of natural light and warmth at parts beyond the ice wall.  When NASA falls apart under the weight of its increasingly untenable conspiracy, it may finally usher in a new golden age of exploration beyond our natural frontiers the likes of which has never been seen in history.  I find the possibility exciting and hope I live to see the day.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2008, 09:58:07 PM »
*smacks forehead*

Now there might be multiple suns.  Holy mackerel.  Do those suns go faster than the one we see?  Or is the day like 76 hours long past the outer rim?

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2008, 10:00:13 PM »
All of that is impossible to know until we are able to explore the area.  I do think it likely, in keeping with the cosmological principle, that other areas of the earth follow the same laws of physics as our own area.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2008, 10:01:18 PM »
My personal theory is that (even if you assume an infinite plane) there will be no more suns outward. I suspect the suns position is at least in part dictated by the magnetic pole.

The idea just came to me that there may be other suns in a much larger "orbit" of the pole. Or bright collections of stars somewhere rimward.  It's not the kind of thing I'd be willing to set out to explore, however. I suspect someone would like to some day though.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2008, 10:24:14 PM »
The problem with exploring past the ice wall is how?

Its a highly guarded secret.

Some say its a 150,000 ft mountain.  Hard to get over.

Plus I would know which direction to go.  I am still trying to figure out if I point my compass South and start flying why the direction points toward North once you get past the magnetic south pole. 

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2008, 10:36:39 PM »
I suppose if you mounted radio transmitters on the top of the ice wall, you'd be able to roughly triangulate your position. But I don't know what could be expected out there other than cold and darkness.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-81
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2008, 02:01:18 AM »
*smacks forehead*

Now there might be multiple suns.  Holy mackerel.  Do those suns go faster than the one we see?  Or is the day like 76 hours long past the outer rim?
If one spends some time to think about it, they would have known that an infinite earth implies there be more than one sun.  Hardly a new advancement.  It is also a bit naive to think they must orbit the center of our inhabited area. 
« Last Edit: July 01, 2008, 02:03:20 AM by Username »
If yo can't .arge both sides, you understand neit.her

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2008, 04:28:21 AM »
Who else remembers Francy and his seven suns theory and Pureland? Class stuff.
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

Kasroa Is Gone

  • 6863
  • +0/-0
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2008, 10:42:06 AM »
I don't understand what you mean by "wins".

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2008, 11:05:05 AM »
I don't understand what you mean by "wins".

Me either.  I thought the box had already been opened and that the cat was flat.

?

GreenEarth

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2008, 03:17:08 PM »
Yeah, the question was about a finite Earth, not an infinite one :P

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #18 on: July 03, 2008, 10:03:05 AM »
Regardless of GreenEarth's gross misrepresentation of the potential for exploration of a Flat Earth and surrounding universe, it should not matter, even if a Flat Earth would somehow produce utterly terrible results for all humanity.

We should not believe what we believe because it makes us happy, but because it appears to be true.

It would be wonderful if there were an ancient treasure trove of immense value buried ten feet beneath my lawn. If there weren't, I'd be quite upset. Should I quit my job and spend wildly on the basis that I'll no longer need to worry about money if there is, in fact, treasure?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #19 on: July 03, 2008, 01:39:11 PM »
. Should I quit my job and spend wildly on the basis that I'll no longer need to worry about money if there is, in fact, treasure?

I wanna say yes....
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

GreenEarth

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Re: Outcome: which is better in the long run?
« Reply #20 on: July 03, 2008, 05:25:45 PM »
again, I was refering to a finite Earth. But you have a point, I would be happier dying knowing the absolute truth, than living a long life asking questions and not getting an answer.