Earth to be Proven Round Soon

Claiming to go to space is a more extraordinary claim than that people are dishonest?  Wow...

Uniterrupted video of them in freefall for long periods of time is the incredible proof to that claim.  Now if you want to make a separate claim that they're liars I want to see the proof.

Has anyone in this thread proven that sustained space travel is possible yet?

Have anyone in this thread proven that sustained space travel is possible yet?

Predicted and observed locations and velocities of spacecraft match from all locations, so yes:

Has anyone in this thread proven that sustained space travel is possible yet?

No.

6 people claim to have done this? Huge win.

Actually 5 claim to have done it.  The 6th one will supposedly go up in October.

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 25, 2008, 02:14:30 PM

6 people claim to have done this? Huge win.

Actually 5 claim to have done it.  The 6th one will supposedly go up in October.

I'm certain that there are more people who claim to have visited aliens or ghost or ghouls, etc. We also should accept their testimony as fact, right? Unless you can prove they are liars...

Quote from: Tom Bishop on June 25, 2008, 02:27:13 PM

Has anyone in this thread proven that sustained space travel is possible yet?

No.

Well, if you don't count 50 years of space flight history, the pictures taken of spacecraft in orbit from the ground, pictures of earth from space, the testimony of over one hundred astronauts that have been to space (including 12 that walked on the moon), telemetry from deep space probes, etc., then no, there is no evidence that sustained space flight is possible.

So we're in agreement: there is no evidence that sustained space flight is possible.

Quote from: markjo on June 25, 2008, 02:32:56 PM

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 25, 2008, 02:14:30 PM

6 people claim to have done this? Huge win.

Actually 5 claim to have done it.  The 6th one will supposedly go up in October.

I'm certain that there are more people who claim to have visited aliens or ghost or ghouls, etc. We also should accept their testimony as fact, right? Unless you can prove they are liars...

Thats what I was thinking. And a hell of a lot of people claim to speak to God and seen miracles and yet I'm sure most people on this site would say that they much be wrong/lying.

So we're in agreement: there is no evidence that sustained space flight is possible.

Actually I've seen it myself, I've seen irrefutable evidence, that you're too much of a dick to accept that it's evidence whether you agree with it or not doesn't matter.

Quote from: Ski on June 25, 2008, 02:35:43 PM

Quote from: markjo on June 25, 2008, 02:32:56 PM

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 25, 2008, 02:14:30 PM

6 people claim to have done this? Huge win.

Actually 5 claim to have done it.  The 6th one will supposedly go up in October.

I'm certain that there are more people who claim to have visited aliens or ghost or ghouls, etc. We also should accept their testimony as fact, right? Unless you can prove they are liars...

Thats what I was thinking. And a hell of a lot of people claim to speak to God and seen miracles and yet I'm sure most people on this site would say that they much be wrong/lying.

We're a very discerning bunch until it comes to the religion of science and the altar of RET.

Quote from: Professor Gaypenguin on June 25, 2008, 02:40:44 PM

Quote from: Ski on June 25, 2008, 02:35:43 PM

Quote from: markjo on June 25, 2008, 02:32:56 PM

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 25, 2008, 02:14:30 PM

6 people claim to have done this? Huge win.

Actually 5 claim to have done it.  The 6th one will supposedly go up in October.

I'm certain that there are more people who claim to have visited aliens or ghost or ghouls, etc. We also should accept their testimony as fact, right? Unless you can prove they are liars...

Thats what I was thinking. And a hell of a lot of people claim to speak to God and seen miracles and yet I'm sure most people on this site would say that they much be wrong/lying.

We're a very discerning bunch until it comes to the religion of science and the altar of RET.

Damn right we are

Quote from: Ski on June 25, 2008, 02:40:28 PM

So we're in agreement: there is no evidence that sustained space flight is possible.

Actually I've seen it myself, I've seen irrefutable evidence, that you're too much of a dick to accept that it's evidence whether you agree with it or not doesn't matter.

You're part of the conspiracy too! Didn't you know?

 

So we're in agreement: there is no evidence that sustained space flight is possible.

No, we are not in agreement because I do count the 50 years of spaceflight history.

Then we're definitely not in agreement, no.

Then the fray continues.   

I can't stop laughing at the foolishness of the FEers here. They don't accept that they've been owned and HAVE NOT PROVIDED ANY PROOF TO BACK UP THEIR CLAIMS.

This is our forum. If yu're going to come here, the burden of proof is on you to prove we are wrong.

To make this clear: no-one at this forum is going to accep NASA images, data, info, opinion or anything else NASA-related as proof. It's in the FAQ, and it's a basic point, so quit bringing it up.

This is our forum. If yu're going to come here, the burden of proof is on you to prove we are wrong.

To make this clear: no-one at this forum is going to accep NASA images, data, info, opinion or anything else NASA-related as proof. It's in the FAQ, and it's a basic point, so quit bringing it up.

Nasa is not the company offering a trip to space..

READ THE FAQ FIRST POST!

Yes, but it has been referenced as an organisation that proves sustained space flight can exist. Read every post. Thanks.

Yes, but it has been referenced as an organisation that proves sustained space flight can exist.

What is your point?

Space Adventures, the company offering this, is not Nasa. So what does not believing Nasa's pictures, data, etc. have to do with this company?

Read every post. Thanks.

Learn how to spell. Thanks.

Wait, are you trying to say because it goes against your beliefs, you will not believe it whether it is true or not? 

That is very closed minded.  How would you like a RE'er disputing irrefutable evidence that the Earth is flat? Because, that is exactly what you are doing.

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 26, 2008, 01:51:36 AM

Yes, but it has been referenced as an organisation that proves sustained space flight can exist.

What is your point?

Space Adventures, the company offering this, is not Nasa. So what does not believing Nasa's pictures, data, etc. have to do with this company?

Look at the posts that have been made: messierhunter and others have referenced NASA, their space travel and, to quote markjo, "the 50 years of spaceflight history". That means NASA, and that's what I was referring to.

Quote

Read every post. Thanks.

Learn how to spell. Thanks.

How to spell? Not only is that really childish, but I don't see any words I've spelt wrong. Unless you mean 'organisation', which of course is spelt with an 's' in British English, which is to say, proper English. =)

Nasa is not the company offering a trip to space..

Have they launched yet?

I can't stop laughing at the foolishness of the FEers here. They don't accept that they've been owned and HAVE NOT PROVIDED ANY PROOF TO BACK UP THEIR CLAIMS.

Text is so much more meaningful when it's all uppercase and five times larger than usual.

Yeah, caps lock is a profound thing.

Quote from: smchls on June 26, 2008, 02:00:40 AM

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 26, 2008, 01:51:36 AM

Yes, but it has been referenced as an organisation that proves sustained space flight can exist.

What is your point?

Space Adventures, the company offering this, is not Nasa. So what does not believing Nasa's pictures, data, etc. have to do with this company?

Look at the posts that have been made: messierhunter and others have referenced NASA, their space travel and, to quote markjo, "the 50 years of spaceflight history". That means NASA, and that's what I was referring to.

I reference NASA because I can personally show their spacecraft to be in orbit right where they're supposed to be.  Therefore, it is valid for me to trust their evidence as I have yet to see any evidence that says I shouldn't trust them.  For your sake I gave you space adventures since it's a non-nasa company offering spaceflight trips.

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 26, 2008, 02:33:21 AM

Quote from: smchls on June 26, 2008, 02:00:40 AM

Quote from: NEEMAN on June 26, 2008, 01:51:36 AM

Yes, but it has been referenced as an organisation that proves sustained space flight can exist.

What is your point?

Space Adventures, the company offering this, is not Nasa. So what does not believing Nasa's pictures, data, etc. have to do with this company?

Look at the posts that have been made: messierhunter and others have referenced NASA, their space travel and, to quote markjo, "the 50 years of spaceflight history". That means NASA, and that's what I was referring to.

I reference NASA because I can personally show their spacecraft to be in orbit right where they're supposed to be.  Therefore, it is valid for me to trust their evidence as I have yet to see any evidence that says I shouldn't trust them.  For your sake I gave you space adventures since it's a non-nasa company offering spaceflight trips.

I'm not trying to get into an argument with you; I'm just explaining to him why I was talking about NASA.

Wow, NEEMAN you are really getting owned here. 

I reference NASA because I can personally show their spacecraft to be in orbit right where they're supposed to be. 

So because the location is where they say it is, means that the actual device is what they say it is? Right.