I challenge RE

  • 177 Replies
  • 17927 Views
?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
I challenge RE
« on: June 12, 2008, 09:08:12 PM »
Explain spacetime.
What is it? How is it measured?

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2008, 09:13:41 PM »
You think just because we believe in a round Earth we all have physics doctorates?

Can you explain the method of light production in the FE sun?

Let's keep it down to Earth, ay Narc?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2008, 09:16:37 PM »
You think just because we believe in a round Earth we all have physics doctorates?

Can you explain the method of light production in the FE sun?

Let's keep it down to Earth, ay Narc?

I have explained it. I guess RET fails again... thanks for the confirmation.

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13129
  • swiggity swooty
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2008, 09:23:38 PM »
You're welcome.

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2008, 09:31:58 PM »
You think just because we believe in a round Earth we all have physics doctorates?

Can you explain the method of light production in the FE sun?

Let's keep it down to Earth, ay Narc?

I have explained it. I guess RET fails again... thanks for the confirmation.
link? or a brief description?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2008, 09:37:05 PM »
My sig

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2008, 09:46:26 PM »
Quote
The sun and moon form
The bodies rich in dark influx formed into the sun and moon. The sun, which is not as dense as the moon, was flattened from the violent flux of acceleration and high temperatures caused by the extreme forces. Its lower body concaved forming a very dense and smooth reflective surface. The moon flattened some, but is hardly visible.
So the Sun is merely a mirror focusing the Earth's heat and light? So presumably we can focus energy with smaller dishes facing the Earth to provide free power?
We can also presumably do without the Sun? If we put a big enough mirror over patches of the Earth in nighttime we will eventually get daylight? Where does the light come from again?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2008, 09:48:48 PM »
Wow, its almost like there is a thread already discussing that topic.

Care to explain spacetime?

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2008, 09:54:31 PM »
It won't be adequately explained because people here don't have the required education or understanding. I'm fairly confident of that.

Asking for an explanation of something then proclaiming it false when that request goes unanswered is not to be celebrated. It is pointless.

I can't explain exactly how sperm and eggs create new life but I'm pretty sure it happens the way biologists tell me.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2008, 09:55:39 PM »
So the earth is round like you're told?

Another victory for FE!!!

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2008, 09:56:03 PM »
Wow, its almost like there is a thread already discussing that topic.


Isn't there always?
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2008, 03:06:09 AM »
Quote
What is it?

Similar to the spacetime in the FE model, I expect.

Quote
How is it measured?

With a ruler or a stopwatch, I guess.

Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2008, 04:17:18 AM »
Explain spacetime.
What is it? How is it measured?

Take a degree at a respected University in theoretical physics, then if you still don't get it, ask your GR lecturer.

It's not like it's a hard question. It just took a few hundred years for the world's most brilliant minds to answer it. Anyway, why would spacetime be any different in FET?

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #13 on: June 13, 2008, 06:25:18 AM »
I love this thread because it demonstrates the problem with your average Joe Globularist. The reason nobody is likely to explain Spacetime in this thread is because none of them actually understand what the RE scientists are even claiming ("blinding by science").

The globularists who will shy away from this thread because they think it's "too complicated" are admitting that they believe in tenets of globularism because they've been told they're true by an authority figure.

In the middle ages, the self-same individuals, had they been born then rather than now, would, without a shadow of a doubt, have believed in the existence of witchcraft.

Witchcraft is pretty complicated, so there's no real point trying to understand the ins and outs, it's better to just let the church, who happen to be experts on the subject, alert you to the implications of witchcraft.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2008, 06:27:01 AM »
Actually what this thread demonstrates is Narc's inability to recognise a fallacy.

Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2008, 07:12:15 AM »
Man this thread is great! If anybody makes a similar thread asking FE to prove any theory, the burden of proof is on RE. But if someone asks RE to prove something, it's a win for FE!

*

Moon squirter

  • 1405
  • Ding dong!
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #16 on: June 13, 2008, 08:19:02 AM »
So the earth is round like you're told?

Another victory for FE!!!

What exactly has spacetime got do to with the shape of the earth? 

This is a genuine question, because I cannot see the point of your thread in relation to the above answer.
I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #17 on: June 13, 2008, 09:12:38 AM »
What exactly has spacetime got do to with the shape of the earth? 

This is a genuine question, because I cannot see the point of your thread in relation to the above answer.


I believe narcberry is implying the connection some RE scientists make with gravity and the "curvature of space time". Round Earthers sure love their curvature.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

lindelof

  • 422
  • DADA IS NOT DEAD. WATCH YOUR OVERCOAT.
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #18 on: June 13, 2008, 09:54:44 AM »
I'll explain spacetime right after some FE'r explains what time is.  And space.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17541
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #19 on: June 13, 2008, 09:58:52 AM »
Quote
Yes but Galileo observed gravity, as did Newton, as did Neil armstrong. Space-time has little to do with the physical curviture of the earth.

Quoted for ignorance.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #20 on: June 13, 2008, 03:22:34 PM »
Waiting for an answer from RE'ers is painful.

Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #21 on: June 13, 2008, 03:37:25 PM »
I alert you to the presence of this thread:
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=21455.0

I'm certain the FE'ers will have a good answer for you.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #22 on: June 13, 2008, 03:41:10 PM »
I think you're right to give up on RE'ers, Kasroa. I'm gonna hope for a bit longer.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #23 on: June 13, 2008, 07:24:36 PM »
Sounds like a fantastic waste of time, the end of which yielding no results.

Why are RE'ers so sure that gravity is the bending of space time, yet have to shoo FE'ers away to wiki in hopes it explains anything about space-time's mechanism?

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #24 on: June 13, 2008, 07:40:58 PM »
That isn't an answer, you answer it or don't complain that we don't care about what you have to say. That was just copied and pasted with your eyes closed.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #25 on: June 13, 2008, 07:42:25 PM »
Don't just quote, Tom! Say something, please!

I dunno, looks pretty conclusive.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #26 on: June 13, 2008, 08:00:54 PM »
Einstein provided an example of of journey into space, the further away from the mass of the earth the slower time will go. Of course, to the space traveller, time will pass normally but on his return to earth he will find that many more years have passed than he physically lived through.
Your example is wrong.



"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #27 on: June 13, 2008, 08:07:38 PM »
Man, some of you FE'rs are really obnoxios jerk-offs.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #28 on: June 13, 2008, 08:17:20 PM »
Who?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: I challenge RE
« Reply #29 on: June 13, 2008, 08:18:42 PM »
Man so some of u FErs r raelly obnoxyos jerk-offs and

We don't force you to be here.