There is no way a round earth is credible. Please read

At least he's not a jackass, jackass.

I'd like to contradict you there.

~D-Draw

most would

What do you guys think of this?

I think it's a bad arguement, for reasons explained thorougly many times before in this thread.

Half a raindrop and half a raindrop make 1 raindrop. A rain drop and a raindrop is two raindrops. One rain drop times 5 billion raindrops to the third power is a tsunami.

Your view on how teachings work wasn't thought out very well, and it all boiled down to, "Well, this is what I thought it said, and I guess that's how people will see it."

Hey look, that cow weighs about 5 trillion raindrops!

No. Thats not how it works. Cant measure by raindrops, so your argument is wrong.

You are assuming.  If raindrop of 1 gram = x, then
1x + 1x = 2x

If your "bigger raindrop" = y, then
1x + 1x = 1y, and then you are correct BUT 1 + 1 does not equal 1, because 1y = 2x.

Hey look, that cow weighs about 5 trillion raindrops!

No. Thats not how it works. Cant measure by raindrops, so your argument is wrong.

Actually, if the cow sinks, it weighs more than its volume of raindrops (or water).  If all the raindrops were 1 gram and the cow weight 400 lbs with, then the cow would weigh: 181,440 raindrops.  Then we calculate how many raindrops equal the size of the cow.  If more, the cow floats.  If less, the cow sinks.  This is the main priciple of bouyancy.

Ok...

So your proof that the earth is round is that if two raindrops combine they form one? What possible relavance does this have for whether the earth is round or not? Also, were does mathematics come into the precipitation of H20?

Get a life.

Is this not the truth?

Why in the name of fuck was this bumped? It's meaningless.

Agreed + an 'omg'.

I was going to agree, but then Narc posted.

You can't use raindrops as a unit because a raindrop is not constant in any other basic form of measurement.  It's like using units like 1 length of however much we decide at the time...

I was going to agree, but then Narc posted.

I'm so happy I have been an influence in your life, while you parents remain largely ignored.

Quote from: Ulrichomega on August 31, 2007, 01:07:53 PM

I was going to agree, but then Narc posted.

I'm so happy I have been an influence in your life, while you parents remain largely ignored.

Who are you claiming is a parent?

Actually when 1 raidrop combines with another raidrop, they are multiplied: 1 x 1 = 1, so this experiment can still be proven with mathematics.

WTF?  The'ye not multiplied. 1 x 1 = 1 is your original raindrop.  GTFO.

I am saying the original drop and the final drop are the same; the 2nd drop never existed.

Actually when 1 raidrop combines with another raidrop, they are multiplied: 1 x 1 = 1, so this experiment can still be proven with mathematics.

Combining things is done by addition not multiplication.

Good try though.

Is it not the way of the mind, to understand the ways of the words in all substance?

Is it not the way of the mind, to understand the ways of the words in all substance?

But is it not the way of substance to not be understood by the mind?

When the throne of thought is the motion of substance, the rug is thrown.

HOLY SHIT! BULLHORN'S BACK!
How's that study coming?

When the throne of thought is the motion of substance, the rug is thrown.

A crown of thorns, upon thee? GTFO.

C'mon, it's bullhorn. 
He's like Tom Bishop^2. This thread is evidence.

Buffalo buffalo, Buffalo buffalo buffalo, buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

Its the same buffalo superimposed so that it occurs in multiple locations at once.

Exactly like Tom, Narcberry, and that Ann Coulter lookalike hose beast. Fascinating.

Quote from: The Kommunist on September 01, 2007, 10:35:43 AM

Actually when 1 raidrop combines with another raidrop, they are multiplied: 1 x 1 = 1, so this experiment can still be proven with mathematics.

Combining things is done by addition not multiplication.

Good try though.

Why not multiply? You get more bang for your buck (as long as you dont multiply with 1 or <1).

When the throne of thought is the motion of substance, the rug is thrown.

GTFO with your non-relevant failure of a sounding "zen" statement.