Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science

  • 66 Replies
  • 16318 Views
*

Dead Kangaroo

  • FES' Anchor Roo
  • The Elder Ones
  • 4551
  • K800 Model 101.
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #30 on: June 04, 2008, 06:38:14 PM »
Quote
"Majority rules". Its as simple as I can get it. I mean, if the majority believed in FLAT EARTH, I would also believe it. But its not the case!

Only six hundred years ago the majority of the population believed that witchcraft existed.

Did witches exist 600 years ago?  ???
No, but people were dumber back then and believed too much in religion, i'm sure most of the population also thought that god was watching them 20 fo seven and that satan was watching them too like in a shitty M. Night Shymalan Movie. Either way, how does this prove anything?
You make my brain hurt.
↓↓Relief↓↓

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #31 on: June 04, 2008, 06:40:45 PM »
Quote
"Majority rules". Its as simple as I can get it. I mean, if the majority believed in FLAT EARTH, I would also believe it. But its not the case!

Only six hundred years ago the majority of the population believed that witchcraft existed.

Did witches exist 600 years ago?  ???
No, but people were dumber back then and believed too much in religion, i'm sure most of the population also thought that god was watching them 20 fo seven and that satan was watching them too like in a shitty M. Night Shymalan Movie. Either way, how does this prove anything?
You make my brain hurt.
↓↓Relief↓↓
If i hit him with a hammer I would feel better. You are so smart kangy.

*

Snaaaaake

  • 1089
  • ROUND000
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #32 on: June 05, 2008, 02:19:03 PM »
Thing is, all of my quotes in there are true.  ??? And of coarse they haven't proven me wrong once yet.
We told you to go to rehab, but you were all like "no, no, no!" ::)

Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #33 on: June 05, 2008, 03:02:33 PM »
What did you say about coarse that they haven't proven you wrong of?

Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #34 on: June 05, 2008, 03:19:24 PM »
Quote
No, but people were dumber back then

The average IQ hasn't risen in the last millennium. It's not a matter of intelligence.

Quote
i'm sure most of the population also thought that god was watching them

Most of the population still believes that God is watching over them.

Quote
Either way, how does this prove anything?

It proves that "majority rules" is not a valid argument.

Do they believe in vampires and dragons as well?

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17541
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #35 on: June 05, 2008, 03:56:44 PM »
Quote
Do they believe in vampires and dragons as well?

Nope. Most of the population seems content in believing in things like magical fairies in the sky and the idea that the earth is a ball.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #36 on: June 05, 2008, 05:46:41 PM »
And invisible fairy dust that causes things to attract to each other.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Snaaaaake

  • 1089
  • ROUND000
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #37 on: June 05, 2008, 06:01:22 PM »
Gravity exsisits or else the Earth wouldn't.
We told you to go to rehab, but you were all like "no, no, no!" ::)

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #38 on: June 05, 2008, 06:08:30 PM »
Gravity exsisits or else the Earth wouldn't.

Proof of my previous statement.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Snaaaaake

  • 1089
  • ROUND000
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #39 on: June 05, 2008, 06:10:29 PM »
Round. Why are you guys so stupid?  ::) Just ride an airplane retards.
We told you to go to rehab, but you were all like "no, no, no!" ::)

*

Snaaaaake

  • 1089
  • ROUND000
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #40 on: June 05, 2008, 06:11:40 PM »
All the statements in RE vs RE or whatever it's called are 100% true except a few.
We told you to go to rehab, but you were all like "no, no, no!" ::)

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17541
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #41 on: June 05, 2008, 08:24:14 PM »
Round. Why are you guys so stupid?  ::) Just ride an airplane retards.

TheEngineer, a pilot who posts on this forum, tells us that the horizon of the earth is not curved in flight. A direct statement of a pilot's experiences in the cockpit.

Quote:

    "I believe I said that I put myself through college working for an airline, thus having access to free flights around the world.  I also worked for a private FBO, in which the owner owned a Cessna Citation.  I am also a licensed pilot.  Not once, during any of the hundreds if not thousands of flights I've been on, have I ever witnessed the curvature of the Earth."

*

Dead Kangaroo

  • FES' Anchor Roo
  • The Elder Ones
  • 4551
  • K800 Model 101.
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #42 on: June 05, 2008, 09:12:45 PM »
Cosmologist do create odd universes, but more appealing ones..

Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #43 on: June 06, 2008, 11:49:34 PM »

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #44 on: June 07, 2008, 05:42:22 AM »

It was a fucking irony!


...

I'm so glad you've decided to add some of the stupid things you say to this thread, it'll save the rest of us some time.

*

Dead Kangaroo

  • FES' Anchor Roo
  • The Elder Ones
  • 4551
  • K800 Model 101.
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #45 on: June 07, 2008, 12:51:06 PM »
Quote from: ROUND000's sig
If you "believe" the Earth is flat it might be...

Becasue. Servere. Retardness.

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35363
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #46 on: June 08, 2008, 07:54:47 AM »
Winner.

?

Robbyj

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 5459
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #47 on: June 10, 2008, 09:18:11 PM »
This guy is full of win.

97% of the Earth is water.
Why justify an illegitimate attack with a legitimate response?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #48 on: June 10, 2008, 11:13:22 PM »
This guy is full of win.

97% of the Earth is water.
and around 70% of the surface of your body is covered in oceans. We already know this stuff.

?

Robbyj

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 5459
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #49 on: June 12, 2008, 05:14:37 PM »
This one is gonna be hard to beat.

Like I've said, its not correct, but it works.
Why justify an illegitimate attack with a legitimate response?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #50 on: June 12, 2008, 06:04:40 PM »
This one is gonna be hard to beat.

Like I've said, its not correct, but it works.
... so? that could be said about a lot of things. That's actually a valid statement.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #51 on: June 17, 2008, 07:14:20 PM »
If your theory that everything is falling upwards along with Earth was correct, we would be see stars and other objects as lines, instead of as dots in the night sky, much like a camera with a prolonged exposition shows.

I've decided to take advantage of Narcberry's automatic sig generator in an effort to be nicer to poor Roundoo.

This one wins.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #52 on: August 04, 2008, 11:27:29 PM »
Recent updates!

Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #53 on: August 05, 2008, 01:10:50 AM »
Narc Stop bumping all your old shit threads.

?

Theorist

  • 75
  • Prove FE Wrong!
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #54 on: August 09, 2008, 08:00:03 AM »
I have been to the coast and seen the "curve" on the sea but this proves nothing because if you hold a pencil between your index finger and thumb and wobble the pencil about, you get the appearance of the pen being supple (in motion), when it is rigid and flat. (still).

Remember, flat earth isn't still, its hurtling upwards - and also tilting slightly.

There will be a scientific name for this effect you can demonstrate with a pencil, but I didn't waste my time on so-called "science" thank god. I actually want to know things. So I missed out on the name of the effect of shaking a pencil about to make it look curved, big deal.

Anytime some science geek says some big word I do not understand I only need to go look up the definition of that word anyway, then I am at the level of the scientist. People like to sound clever with things like "yaa its circumnavigation yaa" you mean GOING AROUND, you pretentious bastards!

All science seems to do is look for the most mundane answer and go with that. Why does science always focus on the most boring answers all the time? Seems that science is a religion for the most part. A scientist said it so it must be true.

« Last Edit: August 09, 2008, 08:09:51 AM by Theorist »
Prove FE Wrong!

Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #55 on: August 09, 2008, 09:12:53 AM »
Remember, flat earth isn't still, its hurtling upwards - and also tilting slightly.

No it isnt.

Also, youre one of the least convincing trolls Ive seen in quite some time.


?

Theorist

  • 75
  • Prove FE Wrong!
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #56 on: August 09, 2008, 10:04:38 AM »
Remember, flat earth isn't still, its hurtling upwards - and also tilting slightly.

No it isnt.

Also, youre one of the least convincing trolls Ive seen in quite some time.


Trolls for what? RE or FE?

FAQ Says (on my "hurtling upwards" comment):

The Earth is accelerating upwards at 1g (9.8m/s^2) along with every star, sun and moon in the universe. This produces the same effect as gravity.

If I am trolling then the FAQ must be as well.

FAQ Says (on my "tilting slightly" comment):

The tides exist due to a slight see-saw effect on the earth. As it goes back and forth, the water rushes to the side that is lower.

Again, if I am trolling then the FAQ must be as well.

If RE is true, why is it only the idiots who ever try (and fail) to explain RE properly?

« Last Edit: August 09, 2008, 10:08:42 AM by Theorist »
Prove FE Wrong!

Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #57 on: August 09, 2008, 10:06:22 AM »
FAQ Says (on my "tilting slightly" comment):

The tides exist due to a slight see-saw effect on the earth. As it goes back and forth, the water rushes to the side that is lower.


My apologies. This is wrong, and I thought it had been taken out of the FAQ.

?

Theorist

  • 75
  • Prove FE Wrong!
Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #58 on: August 09, 2008, 10:10:07 AM »
FAQ Says (on my "tilting slightly" comment):

The tides exist due to a slight see-saw effect on the earth. As it goes back and forth, the water rushes to the side that is lower.


My apologies. This is wrong, and I thought it had been taken out of the FAQ.

Thats OK we all make mistakes, me included.

IMO the FAQ should re-word this to say it tilts "up and down" since in the cylindrical shaped tube the flat earth is accelerating upwards inside - there isn't any "back" or "forth" as far as I know, only up and down. If it tilted back or forth that implies horizontal movement outside of the boundaries of the cylinder.

By the way I am only here to try to prove FE wrong and like RE'ers keep doing - I keep failing.

My explanations of FE/RE does not denote "support" or "dismissal" of either thing, thats not science.  :P

Imagine the devolved world we would be living in if no man, woman, or child ever changed their fixed views or explored other possibilities?

I agree that flat earth seems improbable to the RE theorist, and yet FE is still possible.

« Last Edit: August 09, 2008, 10:16:33 AM by Theorist »
Prove FE Wrong!

Re: Narc's FE Guide: The Best of RE Science
« Reply #59 on: August 09, 2008, 10:24:07 AM »
Im actually a REr, I just tend to argue for FE most of the time because its more interesting and stimulating.