Earths Circumference.

  • 229 Replies
  • 50663 Views
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #210 on: May 28, 2008, 06:53:51 PM »
We have told you how we think the deep earth (notice didnt say core just for you guys) is heated. You still havent told us any way that the heat from the center of the earth can get to the sun without heating up in the middle. Does your heat teleport?

Oh, I forgot you meant flat earth. For a minute I thought you were an idiot round-earther that couldn't spell.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #211 on: May 28, 2008, 06:54:53 PM »
A reply without a reply.  Classic FE

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #212 on: May 28, 2008, 06:56:11 PM »
There we go. Narc admits he has no idea, no reply. I am not going to try get one out of you any more because i know you dont have one. Go troll somewhere else you loser.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #213 on: May 28, 2008, 07:00:20 PM »
Read the Faq noob.

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #214 on: May 28, 2008, 07:06:08 PM »
I have fag. It says nothing about what ive asked you. You fail colossally.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #215 on: May 28, 2008, 07:06:20 PM »
Read the Faq noob.

Pay extra careful attention to the part that says that Narcberry can't be proven wrong.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #216 on: May 28, 2008, 07:07:03 PM »
 :D FAIL!

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #217 on: May 28, 2008, 07:07:29 PM »
Oh right. I must have ignored that part. You can prove him wrong, i do it all the time, you just cant get him to admit hes wrong is all.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #218 on: May 28, 2008, 07:07:57 PM »

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #219 on: May 28, 2008, 07:11:18 PM »
Oh right. I must have ignored that part. You can prove him wrong, i do it all the time, you just cant get him to admit hes wrong is all.

Actually, to prove Narcberry wrong, you have to be able to understand WTF he's talking about.  That is what makes it impossible to prove him wrong.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #220 on: May 28, 2008, 07:12:47 PM »
Narc, nowhere in there does it answer the question that i asked you. Thanks for wasting my time reading that load of shit. I know you have no answer, stop bullshitting.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #221 on: May 28, 2008, 07:14:26 PM »
Source of Heat
The earth gets its heat from the lower hotter areas as they interact with the UA. This heat radiates outward. It warms all of the earth, but less at the surface where it is more distant. This radiation is also reflected back from the sun, but it all comes from the same source, the deep earth.

Wow, reading really is hard for you RE'ers...

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #222 on: May 28, 2008, 07:25:09 PM »
You sure you didnt just modify that thread? Because that wasnt there before. That still doesnt make any sense anyway. So it radiates from the bottom and heats the sun which is further away more than it does the surface of the earth in the middle? Somethings a bit wrong there.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #223 on: May 28, 2008, 07:30:11 PM »
The sun doesn't absorb most of that heat, it reflects back most of it. Read about the sun in the same thread, it will answer all your questions.

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #224 on: May 28, 2008, 11:13:02 PM »
Do you want me to repeat my question? You just stated an arbitrary point that i already knew about the FE sun. You did nothing to answer my question, or come even close. Neither does you linked thread by the way.

Here it is again.

The heat from deep down in the earth comes upwards, goes through the crust of the earth and makes it up to the sun with sufficient heat to reflect off the tiny little sun and provide a large amount of heat to an even bigger area. If we trace back from the amount of heat the sun provides when reflected back on the earth it should get progressively hotter starting from the head coming from the sun, then the crust of the earth, then the core. But somehow the crust is much cooler, how is this?
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #225 on: May 29, 2008, 10:25:05 AM »
Cooler than what?
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #226 on: May 29, 2008, 06:28:45 PM »
Cooler than everything, the core, the sun, the heat from the sun. Where if you trace back it should be second hottest after the core, then 3rd the sun then 4th the suns reflected heat.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #227 on: May 29, 2008, 06:41:03 PM »
Heat source and transfer:
UA*Deep Earth -> Shallow Earth -> Earth's Surface-> Sun
Earth's Surface
<- Sun

The sun reflects the light and heat from a large object (the entire face of the earth) to a smaller focus the daytime spotlight. That is why sunlight is warmer than the surface of earth, it is focused onto a smaller area.

The earths surface is very warm, even at night. The amount of heat from sunlight is only about 20-40 degrees (daytime temps - nighttime temps), the heat that comes from the deep earth is about 500 degrees. This isn't very good evidence that the sun is the heater of earth and it's deeps...

The sun should also not be the second hottest as you suggest, since the sun reflects this energy back. The moon absorbs much of this energy, so it is likely to be warmer than the sun.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #228 on: May 29, 2008, 07:14:06 PM »
Heat source and transfer:
UA*Deep Earth -> Shallow Earth -> Earth's Surface-> Sun
Earth's Surface
<- Sun

The sun reflects the light and heat from a large object (the entire face of the earth) to a smaller focus the daytime spotlight. That is why sunlight is warmer than the surface of earth, it is focused onto a smaller area.

The earths surface is very warm, even at night. The amount of heat from sunlight is only about 20-40 degrees (daytime temps - nighttime temps), the heat that comes from the deep earth is about 500 degrees. This isn't very good evidence that the sun is the heater of earth and it's deeps...

Then why do the arctic regions stay frozen all year?  Being right in the center of the flat earth means that it should receive at least as much heat from the UA as the rest of the disc.  Also, how does your theory explain the annual change of seasons in the temperate regions?  Shouldn't the whole flat earth be a fairly uniform temperature?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #229 on: May 29, 2008, 08:25:24 PM »
Those are excellent questions actually. The heat comes from the UA interacting with the dark influx at earths lower regions. We do not know conclusively, but either (1) there is a less dense distribution of dark influx at the earths center (birds eye view center) or (2) The UA is not a uniform field, being much weaker in this area. These theories affect both the north pole and southern rim.