Earths Circumference.

  • 229 Replies
  • 50652 Views
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #180 on: May 27, 2008, 07:20:37 PM »
No you just asked your RE directed question again by picking quotes out of context from my last post. What you didnt do is ANSWER MY QUESTION that i asked you directed at FE theory.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #181 on: May 27, 2008, 07:21:24 PM »
I'm still waiting an answer from you.

How does the RE sun heat the core of earth more than its surface?

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #182 on: May 27, 2008, 07:24:34 PM »
Ive answered it. It doesnt, the sun DOESNT heat the center of the earth. I said you must have missed that class in primary school, its not that confusing. Now answer myne please, o wait you cant, so your procrastinating.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #183 on: May 27, 2008, 07:26:51 PM »
So how does RE account for the fact that the earths core is several thousand times hotter than the surface?

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #184 on: May 27, 2008, 07:44:03 PM »
So how does RE account for the fact that the earths core is several thousand times hotter than the surface?

Rarefaction, lol
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #185 on: May 27, 2008, 07:46:17 PM »
I guess RE'ers could use the quantum argument:
ie, it is only very probable that the sun would heat the surface and not the core, we are just very lucky
ie, until the core is directly observed...

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #186 on: May 27, 2008, 07:55:39 PM »
So how does RE account for the fact that the earths core is several thousand times hotter than the surface?

Perhaps nuclear fission of Uranium trapped in the earth's core?

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/earth-03k.html
Quote from: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/earth-03k.html
For ten years, geophysicist J. Marvin Herndon has presented increasingly persuasive evidence that at the very centre of the Earth, within the inner core, there exists a five mile in diameter sphere of uranium which acts as a natural nuclear reactor.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #187 on: May 27, 2008, 08:11:39 PM »
I guess RE'ers could use the quantum argument:
ie, it is only very probable that the sun would heat the surface and not the core, we are just very lucky
ie, until the core is directly observed...

Don't get them started. Next they'll convince us that Schrödinger's cat is still inside the earth's core.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #188 on: May 27, 2008, 11:15:12 PM »
Narc you need to get it through your head that the sun isnt the only thing in the universe that produces heat. The sun has no effect on the core temperature of the earth in RE theory.

Are you going to answer my question now? Or ignore it like the others.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #189 on: May 28, 2008, 11:04:45 AM »
Okay, it isn't the Sun. What is it then? Answer us, we asked first!
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #190 on: May 28, 2008, 11:20:49 AM »
So how does RE account for the fact that the earths core is several thousand times hotter than the surface?

Perhaps nuclear fission of Uranium trapped in the earth's core?

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/earth-03k.html
Quote from: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/earth-03k.html
For ten years, geophysicist J. Marvin Herndon has presented increasingly persuasive evidence that at the very centre of the Earth, within the inner core, there exists a five mile in diameter sphere of uranium which acts as a natural nuclear reactor.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #191 on: May 28, 2008, 11:27:57 AM »
Proof? No, hypothesis. You're pretty bold about the guesswork of someone called Marvin who isn't even a Martian?
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #192 on: May 28, 2008, 11:31:57 AM »
Proof? No, hypothesis. You're pretty bold about the guesswork of someone called Marvin who isn't even a Martian?

No more bold than the FE theory of the sun heating the earth's core.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #193 on: May 28, 2008, 11:36:13 AM »
Flat things don't have a "core", and who said it was, even if it did exist?
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #194 on: May 28, 2008, 11:55:18 AM »
Flat things don't have a "core", and who said it was, even if it did exist?

So your car's radiator doesn't have a core?  Must suck driving that car.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #195 on: May 28, 2008, 12:38:55 PM »
Yeah. Sucks talking to you too. Answer the question.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #196 on: May 28, 2008, 12:57:13 PM »
Yeah. Sucks talking to you too. Answer the question.

There can be a core.

A post a long while back had one imagine a spool standing on its side. The top portion of the spool would be the flat surface in which we reside. The core would be in the middle of the spool, and the lines would extend out over the top portion.

Does that answer your question?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #197 on: May 28, 2008, 01:04:32 PM »
That wasn't the question.

Why does it have to be hot, anyway?
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #198 on: May 28, 2008, 02:47:44 PM »
That wasn't the question.

Why does it have to be hot, anyway?

So, what was your question?  Why does what have to be hot?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #199 on: May 28, 2008, 05:07:41 PM »
Talking to an RE'er is difficult because you need to phrase your question in a way that they don't forget what is being discussed before they identify the raised inflexion indicating a question had been asked. Crap, I failed, I meant; To talk RE is to talk dumb.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #200 on: May 28, 2008, 05:29:36 PM »
http://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/interior.html


The earths core 101.  Read it, learn it, live it, love it.

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #201 on: May 28, 2008, 06:31:18 PM »
We have told you how we think the deep earth (notice didnt say core just for you guys) is heated. You still havent told us any way that the heat from the center of the earth can get to the sun without heating up in the middle. Does your heat teleport?
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #202 on: May 28, 2008, 06:39:48 PM »
So your earth doesn't have a core anymore?

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #203 on: May 28, 2008, 06:41:25 PM »
So your earth doesn't have a core anymore?


Pay attention dude...I'll type slowly to help you out.  Read the link above.  It will tell you all about the core.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #204 on: May 28, 2008, 06:43:14 PM »
The link you posted actually says the RE doesn't have a core.
Quote from: narcberry on Today at 06:39:48 PM

I wish your model would just stay consistent for the duration of a thread.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #205 on: May 28, 2008, 06:46:06 PM »
What are you talking about???


Here's quote from the site

Quote
The earth is divided into four main layers: the inner core, outer core, mantle, and crust. The core is composed mostly of iron (Fe) and is so hot that the outer core is molten, with about 10% sulphur (S). The inner core is under such extreme pressure that it remains solid. Most of the Earth's mass is in the mantle, which is composed of iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), and oxygen (O) silicate compounds. At over 1000 degrees C, the mantle is solid but can deform slowly in a plastic manner. The crust is much thinner than any of the other layers, and is composed of the least dense calcium (Ca) and sodium (Na) aluminum-silicate minerals. Being relatively cold, the crust is rocky and brittle, so it can fracture in earthquakes.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #206 on: May 28, 2008, 06:48:17 PM »
Yay, straight from a government subsidized edu site...
Sounds like official information there...

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #207 on: May 28, 2008, 06:50:35 PM »
Yeah your right.  I hate confusing things with the facts.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #208 on: May 28, 2008, 06:52:29 PM »
It's so official that any crackpot can theorize the center of RE is actually a giant fission bomb, and the RE scientific community will nod their heads and wonder...

Re: Earths Circumference.
« Reply #209 on: May 28, 2008, 06:52:47 PM »
No narc, the FE doesnt have a core apparently, so im keeping it simple for you by saying lower down. But even that seemed to get you confused. We have given you our theory. If you dont give us yours next post them i proclaim that you have no damn idea and that you need to change your thoughts on how the sun works.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.