Schrödinger's earth

  • 80 Replies
  • 15705 Views
?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #60 on: May 03, 2008, 05:29:29 PM »
That's the atmoshpere.

And the curvature of the Earth.

Does this not prove my point?

Send me the pictures/
Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #61 on: May 03, 2008, 05:33:28 PM »
Of course there is a curve -- it's a disc. It certainly doesn't show a sphere, does it?

Here's a quick look at the lesser ice wall. Not to be confused with the larger one.
http://www.vebjorn-sand.com/images/ice_shelf.jpg
http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/images/wsci_02_img0265.jpg
http://www.worldproutassembly.org/images/frigate.jpg
http://www.nsf.gov/news/mmg/media/images/larsenbtewksbury_f.jpg
http://aphriza.files.wordpress.com/2006/11/polarstern.jpg


There's more, but I'm lazy. If you're too lazy to read "E:NaG" I can't really be bothered to do your research for you...


That's several more pictures than you've provided of sinking ships on the horizon...
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #62 on: May 03, 2008, 05:44:45 PM »
Those are just pictures of antarctic ice sheets, which exist in a RE model. The photographs prove nothing.

Why would these features not exist on a RE?

Now, show me the 27,000 km of them, and I'll believe you.



But you have no evidence of that, do you.
Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #63 on: May 03, 2008, 05:47:54 PM »
Show me a picture of the south pole with a compass pointing in all directions and the expeditionists all clearly in view with their identification visible and legible.

But you have no evidence of that, do you.

?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #64 on: May 03, 2008, 05:53:25 PM »
It's probably on google somewhere.

but I do have this: www.news.harvard.edu/.../photos/01-winter.jpg
explain the aurora borealis + corealis.
I've seen the former, so don't pass it off as a hoax.

http://loose-tooth.ucsd.edu/science/antarctica.jpg
And images such as that are dismissed as hoaxes, aren't they.


Your conspiracy theories smell of fail.
Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #65 on: May 03, 2008, 05:59:24 PM »
Those are just pictures of antarctic ice sheets, which exist in a RE model. The photographs prove nothing.

Why would these features not exist on a RE?

Now, show me the 27,000 km of them, and I'll believe you.

Well, I'd suppose the RE model would have to account for it somehow or it wouldn't be a very good model. You still haven't shown pictures of the sinking ship effect.

As to your picture of "Antarctica", I have no doubt that such an island may exist -- Cook did likely circumnavigate something after all. I'm not sure what your picture proves, and I can't verify it's authenticity because it comes from NASA.

And I showed you evidence of the greater ice wall, and you threw it away because it didn't fit your model...
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #66 on: May 03, 2008, 06:03:02 PM »
That displayed the curvature of the earth.
As well as some hazy white shit on the horizon.

Proves my point, not yours.

Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #67 on: May 03, 2008, 06:07:01 PM »
That displayed the curvature of the earth.
As well as some hazy white shit on the horizon.

Proves my point, not yours.



You bore me

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #68 on: May 03, 2008, 06:09:17 PM »
That displayed the curvature of the earth.
As well as some hazy white shit on the horizon.

Proves my point, not yours.


Forgive me for using the same standard to interpret the data, then.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #69 on: May 03, 2008, 06:18:36 PM »
That displayed the curvature of the earth.
As well as some hazy white shit on the horizon.

Proves my point, not yours.



You bore me

Narcberry, tomorrow, I shall be gone. But you will still be pursuing the same, futile scientific goal.

Your theory is wank.
Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #70 on: May 03, 2008, 06:19:27 PM »
Another victory for FE!!!

doubt not believers, for all such as he shall leave as he and it shall be good.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17996
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #71 on: May 03, 2008, 06:25:31 PM »
Quote
I see an apparant curvature in the earth.

"Even amateur balloonists can observe a curvature in the earth" - Tom Bishop, apparantly.

The earth appears curved from a very high altitude near the edge of space because the observer is looking down at the circular (or slightly ovular as it is in come models) spotlight of the sun upon our Flat Earth.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2008, 06:27:14 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #72 on: May 03, 2008, 06:33:59 PM »
No, this is no victory for FE. You carefully sidestepped any questions i raised and simply dismissed any studies and evidence aws "flawed" or ignored them completely.

You have much to learn, narcberry.
Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #73 on: May 03, 2008, 06:35:27 PM »
No, this is no victory for FE. You carefully sidestepped any questions i raised and simply dismissed any studies and evidence aws "flawed" or ignored them completely.

You have much to learn, narcberry.

Like how to lose a debate?
OMG ZING!

Another victory for FE!!!

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #74 on: May 03, 2008, 06:38:26 PM »
You carefully sidestepped any questions i raised and simply dismissed any studies and evidence aws "flawed" or ignored them completely.

Isn't this exactly what you've done? Dismissing ideas before you even understand the premise behind them?
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #75 on: May 03, 2008, 06:39:56 PM »
I'll admit that I was somewhat incorrect about the acceleration, yes.

But you FE'ers really do sidestep awkward questions, and provide completely inadequate answers.
Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #76 on: May 03, 2008, 06:41:17 PM »
I'll admit that I was somewhat incorrect about the acceleration, yes.

But you FE'ers really do sidestep awkward questions, and provide completely inadequate answers.

But you RE'ers ignore the thousands of posts ready to be searched and go directly into asking poorly worded questions and deny any answers.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #77 on: May 03, 2008, 06:43:44 PM »
I'll admit that I was somewhat incorrect about the acceleration, yes.

But you FE'ers really do sidestep awkward questions, and provide completely inadequate answers.

But you RE'ers ignore the thousands of posts ready to be searched and go directly into asking poorly worded questions and deny any answers.

Further, when shown to be wrong, instead of saying, "I'm sorry; I don't understand Lorentzian Transformation or know the correct formula to use to calculate acceleration at high relative speeds"   He says," I understand them perfectly well. I'm only 15. You're still idiots."
The irony here is thick...
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

The Great Mighty Poo

  • 88
  • That's me, and the Hydra is my Bitch.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #78 on: May 03, 2008, 06:47:20 PM »
Lolz I have no discernible qualifications and I could still tear holes in this hypothesis.
Possibly too good for his own trousers? Yeah.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #79 on: May 03, 2008, 06:51:10 PM »
Lolz I have no discernible qualifications and I could still tear holes in this hypothesis.

You've done a hell of a job so far...
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Schrödinger's earth
« Reply #80 on: May 03, 2008, 06:57:34 PM »
Ahaha.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good