New E=MC2 evidence

  • 58 Replies
  • 5280 Views
?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
New E=MC2 evidence
« on: April 17, 2008, 09:32:33 PM »
The Powis Square Journey
In her most recent publication, Carrey has introduced some new evidence surrounding E=MC2 that give more credence to FE. This came from her thoughts while she took a trip in Powis Square.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Speaking of the FE model:
Quote
People ask what`s the deal? This ain`t how it`s supposed to be

But goes on to explain why it is:
Quote
Ritual ideas [sic] relativety only buildings no people ... Timeslide place to hide nudge reality
This is based on her 4 part assertion that is not introduced until much later in her publication.
Quote
Bloodlust - Greek God - Gold discovery
Gone bust - Tight wad - Slow recovery
Axe job - Flame thrower - Ironbar and gun
Betting shop - New owner - A walk in the sun

She even cites evidence:
Quote
Space guy fell from the sky. Scratched my head and wondered why. Time slide into time. Across international dateline. Scientist eats bubblegum
Of course, the FE model has predicted that perpetual flight by "space guy" is impossible. But she goes further.
Quote
notions get reversed [sic] centre of the universe
Of course this leads well into FE theory on earth being the center of the universe.

This not only leads us to the conclusion that the earth is flat, but moreover:
Quote
Foresight minds wide magic imagery

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2008, 12:38:13 AM »
" ' " is an apostrophe, " ` " isn't.

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12682
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2008, 12:55:40 AM »
I take it you're not a fan of that song/poem then?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2008, 09:20:45 PM »
Another victory for FE!!!

?

Roundearthandjesus

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2008, 10:09:58 PM »
I have to ask. How in the world did you people come to believe this FE crap?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2008, 05:11:02 PM »
If you followed the evidence as presented, you wouldn't be asking.
Try again.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2008, 06:39:07 PM »
No comment from RE, I guess it's the clever combination of numbers, reading, and logistical study that scared them off.

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2008, 08:29:30 PM »
Or no one gives a crap about what you say.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2008, 09:00:55 PM »
Avoidance, what a colossal mistake.

?

elgatofilo

  • 189
  • Have some tap water... on me.
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2008, 09:04:19 PM »
Avoidance, what a colossal mistake.


He is right though.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17521
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2008, 09:45:41 PM »
Quote
Or no one gives a crap about what you say.

So in other words you concede the argument?

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2008, 09:46:41 PM »
Im not arguing with him, no one is because no1 cares what he has to say?
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17521
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2008, 09:47:51 PM »
Im not arguing with him, no one is because no1 cares what he has to say?

If you don't care, why are you here posting about it?

Since you don't seem to have a coherent rebuttal it appears that Narcbery has won the debate.

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2008, 09:50:34 PM »
He cant win if im not arguing. There is no winner if there is no opposition. I read his thread and didnt really get what point he was trying to make, so i was just going to ignore it. Until i saw he tried to claim a victory because no one replied to his post, because it didnt make any sense, and also because no one wants to bother with narberry any more.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2008, 10:02:38 PM »
So now you're losing an argument with Tom too.

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2008, 11:54:17 PM »
You guys loose at life in general.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2008, 11:10:10 AM »
Narcberry's threads are plain awesomeness.

RESPECT HIM.


?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2008, 04:48:19 PM »
Well this one officially gets chalked up to FE.

RE'ers are just embarrassing themselves here.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #18 on: May 24, 2008, 04:59:13 PM »
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #19 on: May 24, 2008, 05:41:06 PM »
i dont really get what the heck you OR is on about, no one seems to, hence why you have no responses. That compounded with that no one cares what you have to say, like i said above. Sounds to me like she wrote dang poem.

Quote
Space guy fell from the sky. Scratched my head and wondered why. Time slide into time. Across international dateline. Scientist eats bubblegum

Example of what i mean by the poem.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #20 on: May 24, 2008, 05:58:41 PM »
He lost to narc and Tom.

Super victory for FE!

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #21 on: May 24, 2008, 07:02:17 PM »
No, i didnt say it was a conspiracy/illusion/myth so you dont win shit. I just said i dont get what the hell his nonsensical OP is about.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #22 on: May 24, 2008, 07:03:00 PM »
He lost to narc and Tom.

Super victory for FE!

Correction; Narc, Tom and Ireland.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #23 on: May 24, 2008, 07:04:00 PM »
No, i didnt say it was a conspiracy/illusion/myth so you dont win shit. I just said i dont get what the hell his nonsensical OP is about.

Another victory for FE!
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #24 on: May 24, 2008, 07:17:08 PM »
Victory for RE!!! yay.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #25 on: May 24, 2008, 07:18:32 PM »
He cant win if im not arguing.

Another victory for FE
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #26 on: May 24, 2008, 07:19:29 PM »
YAY, we are winnars!

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #27 on: May 24, 2008, 07:47:38 PM »
I thought we were just yelling out that we won for fun, for no reason. I was just joining in.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #28 on: May 24, 2008, 09:56:04 PM »
But seriously, the Powis Square thought experiment even answers your NZ to AU question.

Re: New E=MC2 evidence
« Reply #29 on: May 24, 2008, 11:04:04 PM »
So you changed your mind? I thought the answer was that there was time delay in the plane. Please be constant, stop changing your mind.
But a sure-fire method would be to land on the top side of the sun.