Poll

Who will win?

Ron Paul
6 (18.2%)
Barack Obama
12 (36.4%)
Hillary Clinton
4 (12.1%)
John McCain
4 (12.1%)
Someone Else
7 (21.2%)

Total Members Voted: 32

Voting closed: June 12, 2008, 08:26:04 AM

Projected Election Results

  • 42 Replies
  • 6837 Views
*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #30 on: April 29, 2008, 02:50:48 AM »
Hilary Clinton's an idiot.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

TheA1pha0mega

  • 175
  • But it's on the UN flag! That makes it real right?
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #31 on: April 29, 2008, 07:35:52 AM »
King Bishop wins my vote just for that comment.

 ;D

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #32 on: April 29, 2008, 01:18:19 PM »
Yay, I'm gonna beat McCain!
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #33 on: April 29, 2008, 01:22:21 PM »
Concerning the negative stigma some have applied lately to Obama, an association with the politics of Louis Farrakhan is a good thing.

The US dollar is on a crash course downwards with no signs of stopping save a completely new dollar - a new currency in which case probably all of the main three candidates would use as an opportunity to introduce a united North American currency to replace the US dollar - the AMERO.  This is something that Ron Paul would obviously oppose and which Bush, McCain and Clinton would endorse, but where would Obama stand with reguard to this?

The Late Great USA:  The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada
By Jerome Corsi
http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2116
Fostering trade does not equal a merger. 5.5/10 for effort, and the thread is the only thing stopping the copypasta.
Quote
Can the FAQ...
Yes, it can.

?

Wakka Wakka

  • 1524
  • Beat The Hell Outta Spheres!
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #34 on: May 02, 2008, 11:21:19 PM »
Whoever voted for Ron Paul is a complete idiot.  I'm not for the war in Iraq but I can't believe Ron Paul would vote against body armor for soldiers in Iraq!!  How is he not a Nazi?  Oh shit, he's my congressman too.  :'( :'(
Normally when I'm not sure I just cop a feel.

?

Anteater7171

  • 9416
  • I am the FAQ!!!
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #35 on: May 03, 2008, 12:19:25 AM »
Quote
How is he not a Nazi?

He's a libertarian, not a fascist for one.
I don't remember anything. Well, I do, but it's really vague. Like I was on drugs the whole time.

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #36 on: May 03, 2008, 09:09:10 AM »
Quote
How is he not a Nazi?

He's a libertarian, not a fascist for one.

He's not a libertarian, he's a moron. You see, the subtle difference that you have to pick out is that libertarianism makes some semblance of common sense.


~D-Draw

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #37 on: May 03, 2008, 09:15:54 AM »
Does it? Capitalism makes sense, fascism makes sense, but just about everything left wing is insane.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #38 on: May 03, 2008, 09:20:35 AM »
Does it? Capitalism makes sense, fascism makes sense, but just about everything left wing is insane.

Libertarianism is right wing. Hence why Ron Paul was running for Republican candidacy.

More importantly, libertarianism is pretty much the most straightforward you can get as far as political theory goes. It mixes capitalism, a free market, with social liberalism, a free society. It's fairly obvious.

~D-Draw

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #39 on: May 03, 2008, 09:23:14 AM »
I'm sorry for not keeping up with Ron Paul's political agenda. He's not going to win anyway, so why do you care?
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13149
  • swiggity swooty
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #40 on: May 03, 2008, 09:25:04 AM »
RON PAUL fes

?

17 November

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 1318
Re: Projected Election Results
« Reply #41 on: May 11, 2008, 12:08:38 PM »
Quote from: Agent_0042
Quote from: 17 November
Concerning the negative stigma some have applied lately to Obama, an association with the politics of Louis Farrakhan is a good thing.

The US dollar is on a crash course downwards with no signs of stopping save a completely new dollar - a new currency in which case probably all of the main three candidates would use as an opportunity to introduce a united North American currency to replace the US dollar - the AMERO.  This is something that Ron Paul would obviously oppose and which Bush, McCain and Clinton would endorse, but where would Obama stand with reguard to this?

The Late Great USA:  The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada
By Jerome Corsi
http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2116
Fostering trade does not equal a merger.

No one ever claimed simple buying and selling meant political union, but when you aim to unite the monies of different countries into a single common currency, that most definitely spills over into politics.  This is not aimless babble - it just happened in Europe.  Southern European countries with weak currencies like the Greek drachma now have the same currency as Germany and France.  IF you don't believe stuff like NAFTA is intended to bring about the same thing between Mexico and the US and Canada, then you are ignoring reality.