The concept of entropy is included in my theory via eventual destruction. It appears to me that this is the eventual conclusion of all systems in our universe, but development seems also integral. It's definitely an elementary hypothesis, I think it primarily deals with the nature of 'things,' what is a thing and what is real.
This deals with the somewhat paradoxical notion that our atoms constantly die and are replaced, though our notion of self is maintained. Along the same lines is the issue of numbers as things, a table as a thing (beyond its constitute parts), love as a thing, the future as a thing, etc. Definitely a very deep philosophical question. So, I suppose I am hypothesizing that although individual components, perhaps the most real things (if there is in fact a hierarchy of real) are prone to entropy, the concept of the thing as a whole is prone to growing complexity to an eventual destruction.
This would follow with the Heideggarean notion of alethea (unconcealment) via poesis (bringing forth in the form of techne (highlighting and bringing forth 'natural' essences of a thing) and art, music, poetry, etc.) as well as the convoluted idea of technology (with the essence as Gestell (enframing), reducing all things to standing-reserve). In this philosophy, things are not created or destroyed, but uncovered and covered. The truth, and ultimate telos of life, is the ultimate alethea (translated in Latin as Veritas - Truth) of the essence of existence. Perhaps there is no true movement of things toward complexity, but a simple uncovering of pre-existing essences, covered for one reason or another.
I know that was really detailed, but Heidegger deserves a detailed account of his philosophy.