Now THAT makes sense.
As opposed to something that was spoon-fed to you?
Wait, so his "spoon-fed" explanation which works, and explains things quite well doesn't beat your "There isn't a feasible explanation for that as of now"? I'm so lost, how can you all claim we are idiots/sheep/retards/whatever insulting thing you want to say about our ability to form thought, when you can't even explain everything?
Let me put it this, lets drop the FE RE arguement for a moment. What if the arguement were set up like this.
Side A believed 1 way because of massive amounts of studies, and everything that happened with said object could be predicted due to the workings discovered with those studies.
Side B believed 1 way because of a few studies, from people who've been dead for nearly a century, and few explanations for how things worked.
So if a person believed Side A that makes them a moron?