Why do we always see the same face of the moon?

Quote from: Username on March 05, 2008, 02:30:00 PM

Quote from: fshy94 on March 05, 2008, 11:02:56 AM

He doesn't. It just is.... Seriously, my guess, is that no-one will touch this thread.

Well, my theory doesn't have this issue, so I've kept out of it.

Really?  How does it work?

He agrees with the RE astronomical distances and sizes, methinks. I think I heard him talking about it somewhere else.

Yeah, I'm still working on findin the time to sit down and figure out the translation between locations.

Epic facepalm

We actually can notice, that what we see as a moon changes it's texture, but not very insgnificant. And that's actually proves what Tom says about "we always see the underside of the moon", because it's as high as sun.

Another thing about moon is, that it's path resembles the sun's one. after the day ends, we see the moon chasing the sun, using the same path. That's strange. VERY and VERY not CHAOTIC, not as everything in the space(as told to us). Everything about the moon and the sun is very precise, but for all of us it represented as a "magic coincidence". For example RE theory of why we see one side of a moon.

And third thing: look at the moon today - it's beautiful. It has so much power, i doubt sun shine on it, especially if they go the very same way everyday, but somehow we see different shapes of moon...

Magic > Science ?

We actually can notice, that what we see as a moon changes it's texture, but not very insgnificant. And that's actually proves what Tom says about "we always see the underside of the moon", because it's as high as sun.

Another thing about moon is, that it's path resembles the sun's one. after the day ends, we see the moon chasing the sun, using the same path. That's strange. VERY and VERY not CHAOTIC, not as everything in the space(as told to us). Everything about the moon and the sun is very precise, but for all of us it represented as a "magic coincidence". For example RE theory of why we see one side of a moon.

And third thing: look at the moon today - it's beautiful. It has so much power, i doubt sun shine on it, especially if they go the very same way everyday, but somehow we see different shapes of moon...

Magic > Science ?

I hope this is a joke. Not the magic part. But about the "giant coincidence" in RE theory.

Yeah, that's probably a joke, jce is an RE'er...

I think he's from Belarus and sometimes there's language problems. 

Yeah, that's probably a joke, jce is an RE'er...

No, I know he is a round earther, but i hope he realizes none of those things are coincidences, just the way math works.

Yeah, I'm still working on findin the time to sit down and figure out the translation between locations.

Hmm... You're using the RE distance?  How does the moon set then if it is so high above ground?  That's got to be some massive refraction going on.

Oh and Tom, I'm still waiting for your reply.  The diagram is simple.

Quote from: Username on March 19, 2008, 10:48:31 AM

Yeah, I'm still working on findin the time to sit down and figure out the translation between locations.

Hmm... You're using the RE distance?  How does the moon set then if it is so high above ground?  That's got to be some massive refraction going on.

Oh and Tom, I'm still waiting for your reply.  The diagram is simple.

Aetheric relocation

Quote from: jdoe on March 21, 2008, 07:01:12 PM

Quote from: Username on March 19, 2008, 10:48:31 AM

Yeah, I'm still working on findin the time to sit down and figure out the translation between locations.

Hmm... You're using the RE distance?  How does the moon set then if it is so high above ground?  That's got to be some massive refraction going on.

Oh and Tom, I'm still waiting for your reply.  The diagram is simple.

Aetheric relocation

Bizarre???

Okay Username, I have a question for you.  If you know you must have this extreme aetheric refraction to make the FE model work in the first place, how are you even able to determine the height of the sun and moon?  Wouldn't the refraction skew all of the light rays, making the traditional methods like parallax, which assume straight light rays, unusable?  I would think it be impossible, unless you knew the refracting properties of the aether beforehand.  But how would you know the properties of the aether?

Bumped for my pretty illustration.

Quote from: Moon squirter on February 29, 2008, 08:03:25 AM

BUMP.  Great question.  -Only from FEers who believe the moon it spherical (Tom, )

Hell, I'd like to hear a globularist explanation if that's alright??

The spherical moon being mapped by grail, shows that the gravity is stronger on the near side then on the far side, with near side being heavier acts like the ballast of a ship. while the moon sales on the Space time curvature of the earth, and it is this ballast that keeps the near side facing the Earth.