To try and "list evidence" is a little skewed, especially since the post is made by a committed globularist.
The disparity is happening already.
*Time dilation at high altitudes has, to my knoweldge, not yet been independantly demonstrated to a degree which satisfies even the most casually observant independant scientific minds.
*"Photos" of the Earth from space by no means constitute legitimate evidence for a globuarist interpretation any more than a freeze-frame from a Harry Potter movie constitutes legitimate evidence for the existence of magic.
*Regarding a circular shadow during a lunar eclipse, the author clearly isn't aware of several discourses on the topic of eclipses happening on this very website (mostly already addressed in prior publications over a century ago. You guys really need to read up on the subject a little).
*Anyone who views Plato's retarded "sinking ship phenomenon" as evidence clearly lacks a basic understanding of the laws of perspective, and the only legitimate sources for Antarctic circumnavigation are by most standards of reason considered Conspiracy sycophants.
*Christ, reading this list I just get angrier and angrier - if you'd actually lurk a bit more and read the odd zetetic article now and again, you'd see why a zetetic might well agree that background radiation points towards a big bang, and that it doesn't suggest a globular Earth whatsoever.
*The psychopathic Alfred Russel Wallace had a vested interest in lying about the result of his mockery-of-a-repeat-of-a-legitimate-scientific experiment, financial, no less. If you're really interested, go and perform the Beford Level Experiment yourself. Guess what result you'll get.
*Focault's pendulum, and various other globular pendulum experiments have already been repeatedly disputed. Search function.
*Disproven already. Search function.