There's a problem in FET which has probably plagued most REers. Satellites.
So far, I've seen two schools of thought, neither of which provides a good explanation. They don't exist, or they're planted by NASA
The main problem I have with this is that there's a lot more to satellites than NASA putting a few objects up there. A number of different groups have launched objects into space, including a few privately owned companies. Even more are involved in the manufacture of satellite parts and guidance systems. There's a vast number of Earth stations that listen to satellites, and I expect very few, if any, are controlled by NASA. No doubt thousands of people also have satellite dishes attached to their homes, pointing skywards.
GPS is also a small concern to me. I've seen the arguments that say you don't need a system of satellites to provide a GPS system, and I'm aware that you could run such a system without one. The system that's currently used, however, couldn't be. GPS receivers, in principle, generate a position based off of the delay between signals generated from the emitters. Trying to fool a civilian receiver into thinking that the objects it's receiving from are tens of thousands of kilometers up in the sky doesn't bear thinking about.
I really want to know how FE explains away satellites. Just dismissing them as part of the conspiracy gets a lot more people involved, and doesn't explain why dishes are pointed skywards.