noob essentials: troll bishop lies

  • 6 Replies
  • 4970 Views
?

cpt_bthimes

  • 553
  • exposer of lies
noob essentials: troll bishop lies
« on: January 01, 2008, 02:03:40 PM »
this post (and it's companion) are brief guides for the fes forum newcomer.

this is a demonstration that tom bishop is a troll - nothing more, nothing less.  the premise is such: no rational person could believe that bishop could tell so many easily verifiable lies, so many times...and also be legitimately sincere in his beliefs.  (beliefs which are, by apparent unanimous consensus even among fe'ers, the most staunchly absurd among them.)

this list of lies were collected from a narrow viewpoint.  (most are a sampling from my experience with him, and one or two from others).  it covers a very limited time frame.  i may or may not (probably not) update this post as time goes on to include future (or past) examples.

regular and especially senior members know all of this about bishop already, and won't find much value in reading on.  but for the noob, it is essential reading.


  • doesn't consider photographs as evidence: lie #1 (of countles) | truth

  • a canon digital rebel xti with 400mm zoom lens does not meet rowbotham's requirements for restoring sunken [islands /cities] from 28 miles away: lie | truth

  • ross traveled 60,000 miles around antarctica: lie | truth

  • misrepresented toronto pic: lie | truth

  • can see children splashing in 55 degree water and frisbees from 33 miles away at sea level: lie | truth

  • his model of telescope does not have a camera mount: lie #1 | lie #2 | truth

  • ice wall at the end of the known earth: lie | truth

update 200080102: added to subject title, and added introductory text to make the intention more clear.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2008, 11:06:38 AM by cpt_bthimes »

?

JackASCII

  • 2337
  • Bitches love me.
Re: bishop lies
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2008, 09:04:05 AM »
Yeah, we know. Gave up on changing him along time ago.
Yes, quite.  No one would ever claim to be someone they're not in their profile name.

*

Dead Kangaroo

  • FES' Anchor Roo
  • The Elder Ones
  • 4551
  • K800 Model 101.
Re: bishop lies
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2008, 09:29:44 AM »
Yeah, we know. Gave up on changing him along time ago.
Why change him? He wouldn't get the same reputation then.

Re: bishop lies
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2008, 09:45:17 AM »
Hey, caps, how's life under that rock treating you?
Quote
Can the FAQ...
Yes, it can.

?

JackASCII

  • 2337
  • Bitches love me.
Re: bishop lies
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2008, 11:10:28 AM »
Yeah, we know. Gave up on changing him along time ago.
Why change him? He wouldn't get the same reputation then.

EXACTLY... he distracts the outsiders from our real objective.
Yes, quite.  No one would ever claim to be someone they're not in their profile name.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: noob essentials: troll bishop lies
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2008, 11:13:26 AM »
and, also, for any noobs:

cpt_bthimes has demonstrated that he is a troll of even higher order than Tom Bishop.

Amen,

Your Lord and Master Z
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

JackASCII

  • 2337
  • Bitches love me.
Re: noob essentials: troll bishop lies
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2008, 11:16:38 AM »
I dunno, I like him. He's got chutzpah.
Yes, quite.  No one would ever claim to be someone they're not in their profile name.