Fly a MiG-31 to the Edge of Space

i was merely using the same logic that FE'er uses for there conspiracy.

'you cant prove the conspiracy wrong so its right.'

and ive still yet to see a real answer, just opinions and assumtions, (shameless plug for answers>>>) just like my different hours of sunlight thread and my scientists thread and my creation of the FE thread.

gotcha.  in that case, an excellent post.  that *is* how some of the fe'ers think they win aruments, case closed.

Quote from: Username on December 07, 2007, 09:30:52 AM

However, since you asked, we've already shown the earth is flat;  by your claim that would be proof that the site is fake.

show me please ? i just keep seeing RE winning threads recently .

Well, since you can't prove that Tom Bishops experiment is false, by your logic, it has to be true.

i was merely using the same logic that FE'er uses for there conspiracy.

'you cant prove the conspiracy wrong so its right.'

and ive still yet to see a real answer, just opinions and assumtions, (shameless plug for answers>>>) just like my different hours of sunlight thread and my scientists thread and my creation of the FE thread.

What answer do you want?  A shady organization run by a NASA lackey that advertises with fake pictures.  You don't exactly have an airtight argument to begin with.

Well, since you can't prove that Tom Bishops experiment is false, by your logic, it has to be true.

what experiments ?

What answer do you want?  A shady organization run by a NASA lackey that advertises with fake pictures.  You don't exactly have an airtight argument to begin with.

fake pics ? why?

Let me elaborate, I haven't seen France yet I don't conclude it isn't there, because I know other people have been to France (among other reasons).

Well, it doesn't. 

apparently Username thinks Tom Bishop is some sort of prophet, speaking DIRECTLY from GOD!

nothing could be stupider! Tom is not a prophet, he's not the pope, he's not a real bishop, he's not any sort of clergyman at all!

every single one of his arguments has been repeatedly disproven, and all he can say is "the people who did those experiments MUST be part of the conspiracy" even though there is also zero proof the conspiracy exists!

subnote: username's "alaska" quote is from a thread i made saying that alaska looks smaller than the rest of the USA on a "mercator" style map, but will be the same size on a globe!

apparently Username thinks Tom Bishop is some sort of prophet, speaking DIRECTLY from GOD!

nothing could be stupider! Tom is not a prophet, he's not the pope, he's not a real bishop, he's not any sort of clergyman at all!

every single one of his arguments has been repeatedly disproven, and all he can say is "the people who did those experiments MUST be part of the conspiracy" even though there is also zero proof the conspiracy exists!

subnote: username's "alaska" quote is from a thread i made saying that alaska looks smaller than the rest of the USA on a "mercator" style map, but will be the same size on a globe!

fail

apparently Username thinks Tom Bishop is some sort of prophet, speaking DIRECTLY from GOD!

nothing could be stupider! Tom is not a prophet, he's not the pope, he's not a real bishop, he's not any sort of clergyman at all!

every single one of his arguments has been repeatedly disproven, and all he can say is "the people who did those experiments MUST be part of the conspiracy" even though there is also zero proof the conspiracy exists!

subnote: username's "alaska" quote is from a thread i made saying that alaska looks smaller than the rest of the USA on a "mercator" style map, but will be the same size on a globe!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhh!!!!!
*donk! - thud*

apparently Username thinks Tom Bishop is some sort of prophet, speaking DIRECTLY from GOD!

nothing could be stupider! Tom is not a prophet, he's not the pope, he's not a real bishop, he's not any sort of clergyman at all!

every single one of his arguments has been repeatedly disproven, and all he can say is "the people who did those experiments MUST be part of the conspiracy" even though there is also zero proof the conspiracy exists!

subnote: username's "alaska" quote is from a thread i made saying that alaska looks smaller than the rest of the USA on a "mercator" style map, but will be the same size on a globe!

fail

guess this is another RE winning thread , ive yet to see any good FE response.

You present photographic "evidence" directly from a NASA lacky.

Grats.

You present photographic "evidence" directly from a NASA lacky.

Grats.

it wasnt so much the pictures it was the hole website , and it wasn't from NASA its from a Russian company

A russian company owned by someone that works on a personal and professional level with NASA and is in the AIAA.

A russian company owned by someone that works on a personal and professional level with NASA and is in the AIAA.

nice, blame it on the conspiracy, when it doubt, conspiracy. 

She.  Works.  With.  NASA.

What the fuck did you expect?

She.  Works.  With.  NASA.

What the fuck did you expect?

maybe some better proof, i guess i just assume to much when it comes to proper proof when on this forum.

maybe some better proof, i guess i just assume to much when it comes to proper proof when on this forum.

Better proof? Proper proof? An elaboration would be nice for a good laugh.

NASA is alleged to be in on the conspiracy. This person works with NASA. It's not hard to connect dots tommo, come on.

Wow, I guess this is an FE winning thread after all.

Wow, I guess this is an FE winning thread after all.

well you did have to resort to conspiracy . took ya 9 pages but when ya losing , pull the conspiracy out.

The conspiracy is fair game any time NASA is involved.  That's a firmly established rule on this site.

Thanks for playing. 

Quote from: tommo on November 22, 2007, 12:11:45 PM

the owners of this site;

http://www.incredible-adventures.com/edgeofspace.html

and this one ;

http://www.daystoamaze.co.uk/pages/product658.tpl

Some company that Jane Reifert, owner of Incredible Adventures, keeps:
http://www.aiaa.org/portal/index.cfm?adview=8&tcspageid=780&getcomm=195

Page 2.

I'm sorry, but a website is not proof at all.  Let alone when its made by someone that works with NASA.

any 1 can pay to see the curvature of the earth, that's proof enough for me.

any 1 can pay to see the curvature of the earth, that's proof enough for me.

You don't have to pay, there are various pictures for free on the Internetz for that.

any 1 can pay to see the curvature of the earth, that's proof enough for me.

Dear god, that only proves it appears that way. Is that what you really call proof? I shouldn't have asked.

Quote from: tommo on December 08, 2007, 12:04:36 PM

any 1 can pay to see the curvature of the earth, that's proof enough for me.

You don't have to pay, there are various pictures for free on the Internetz for that.

yea but there all elaborately faked by NASA

yea but there all elaborately faked by NASA

Why are they fake?

Quote from: tommo on December 08, 2007, 12:13:36 PM

yea but there all elaborately faked by NASA

Why are they fake?

because FET says that all photos showing curvature are fake

I'd like to believe they aren't fake and it "only appears that way" but currently it seems that is less likely.

Quote from: Bushido on December 08, 2007, 12:07:43 PM

Quote from: tommo on December 08, 2007, 12:04:36 PM

any 1 can pay to see the curvature of the earth, that's proof enough for me.

You don't have to pay, there are various pictures for free on the Internetz for that.

yea but there all elaborately faked by NASA

But you only need to prove it to yourself.