plate tectonics

  • 235 Replies
  • 51669 Views
*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #210 on: November 27, 2007, 04:58:01 AM »
Or that plate is stretched into a ring on FE...  ???
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #211 on: November 27, 2007, 05:40:50 AM »
You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
Why?

:D
Good, we finally reach an agreement.


What have we agreed?
Well, what don't you agree?
Virtually everything that you say

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #212 on: November 27, 2007, 05:41:33 AM »
Is the continent of Antarctica connected to the same plate that the ice wall sits on?

Depends on where the Ice Wall is actually located. Given that the Ice Wall hasn't been seen etc... I would guess that no, it isn't on the same plate.
but the ice wall sits on a plate right?

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #213 on: November 27, 2007, 05:53:04 AM »
I'm just struggling to see how this plate that's on the edge of the Earth works. Which was is it moving? Maybe it's time for Jack to draw one of his good pictures to show me the edge of the Earth and how the plate here operates. I bet he doesn't post it, because it won't be possible to draw.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-73
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #214 on: November 27, 2007, 09:33:35 AM »
Well, there obviously has to be an edge if it's finite. I can't remember if Username subscribes to the infinite Earth idea.
Yeah, I do.
If you can't argue both sdes, you undkerstnd neithher

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #215 on: November 27, 2007, 10:10:39 AM »
Virtually everything that you say
Point them out.

I'm just struggling to see how this plate that's on the edge of the Earth works.
The plate is not moving. Can't even comprehend pictures, eh?

Which was is it moving?
Which moving what?

Maybe it's time for Jack to draw one of his good pictures to show me the edge of the Earth and how the plate here operates.
Already shown in the picture. It's your responsibility to fully comprehend its meaning, which I guess you couldn't...

I bet he doesn't post it, because it won't be possible to draw.
Won't be possible to draw what?

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-73
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #216 on: November 27, 2007, 10:22:04 AM »
I find that interesting. So if the earth has no edge, I want to clarify before I continue... do you mean to say the earth has infinite landmass? (Ice or no)

The earth has infinite surface area or at least, sufficiently large surface area.
If you can't argue both sdes, you undkerstnd neithher

*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #217 on: November 27, 2007, 10:52:52 AM »
I find that interesting. So if the earth has no edge, I want to clarify before I continue... do you mean to say the earth has infinite landmass? (Ice or not)

The earth has infinite surface area or at least, sufficiently large surface area.
Sufficiently large enough to not have an edge?  ???
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #218 on: November 27, 2007, 10:55:28 AM »
The Earth has an edge and it's finite.

*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #219 on: November 27, 2007, 11:02:23 AM »
So I have come to understand by the general population. I'm merely trying to understand Username's state of mind.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-73
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #220 on: November 27, 2007, 11:10:16 PM »
I find that interesting. So if the earth has no edge, I want to clarify before I continue... do you mean to say the earth has infinite landmass? (Ice or not)

The earth has infinite surface area or at least, sufficiently large surface area.
Sufficiently large enough to not have an edge?  ???
Large enough that the edge is not a defined point but an eventual tappering off of density that approaches 0.

I think its more likely thats its infinite.
If you can't argue both sdes, you undkerstnd neithher

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #221 on: November 28, 2007, 02:03:22 AM »
Virtually everything that you say
Point them out.

I'm just struggling to see how this plate that's on the edge of the Earth works.
The plate is not moving. Can't even comprehend pictures, eh?

Which was is it moving?
Which moving what?

Maybe it's time for Jack to draw one of his good pictures to show me the edge of the Earth and how the plate here operates.
Already shown in the picture. It's your responsibility to fully comprehend its meaning, which I guess you couldn't...

I bet he doesn't post it, because it won't be possible to draw.
Won't be possible to draw what?

I can't comprehend your picture because it's utter dross. End of. Go back to school.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2007, 02:05:53 AM by lambie »

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #222 on: November 28, 2007, 02:08:59 AM »
Lambie, no matter what you say or do, you are still wrong. That is how this forum works
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #223 on: November 28, 2007, 02:13:49 AM »
You're back. Have you just been reading up on plate tectonics on wikipedia or something ::)
Uh, I have school and work, unlike you.

Here's the Antarctic Plate [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:


Here's how the plates work [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:






From you diagram, it looks like your ice wall is getting a bit too warm

So, your "plate" that the ice wall sits on covers the whole of the underside of the earth too?

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #224 on: November 28, 2007, 02:46:25 AM »
Lambie, no matter what you say or do, you are still wrong. That is how this forum works

haha damn why didn't anyone ever tell me that when i was young and impressionable?

now i've fallen into the eric bloedow category of trying to prove all FE'rs wrong once and for all.

DAMN YOU ALL!
Dumbshoe

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #225 on: November 28, 2007, 03:34:58 AM »
Lambie, no matter what you say or do, you are still wrong. That is how this forum works

So there is no point in the discussion area of the website then.  :o

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #226 on: November 28, 2007, 03:42:17 AM »
unless you want to be proven (i use that word lightly) wrong by the FE'rs, then no.
Dumbshoe

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #227 on: November 28, 2007, 04:32:55 AM »
now i've fallen into the eric bloedow category of trying to prove all FE'rs wrong once and for all.

Jesus, don't sell yourself that short.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #228 on: November 28, 2007, 02:58:56 PM »
So, your "plate" that the ice wall sits on covers the whole of the underside of the earth too?
Do you not understand the legends? That is the crust, and the "plate" is part of the crust, just like the plates on a round Earth.

I can't comprehend your picture because it's utter dross. End of. Go back to school.
Then it's your problem that you can't comprehend pictures. Now, go back and revise plate tectonics. Actually, based on your reasoning, literacy, and comprehensive skills, I can only assume you're still a high school student. Get that high school geography textbook and read.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #229 on: November 28, 2007, 04:10:07 PM »
Lambie, no matter what you say or do, you are still wrong. That is how this forum works

haha damn why didn't anyone ever tell me that when i was young and impressionable?

now i've fallen into the eric bloedow category of trying to prove all FE'rs wrong once and for all.

DAMN YOU ALL!

Just as long as YOU don't start CAPITALISING FAR TOO many words for EXTRA EMPHASIS. Otherwise NO-ONE will take you SERIOUSLY!!!!
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #230 on: November 28, 2007, 04:12:33 PM »
it IS an effective debating technique though.
Dumbshoe

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #231 on: November 28, 2007, 04:14:01 PM »
I don't think so, since I now find myself casually scrolling past all of Eric Bloedow's posts because the letters offend my eyes.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #232 on: November 28, 2007, 04:42:05 PM »
it IS an effective debating technique though.

Italics and Bold > Capitals

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #233 on: November 29, 2007, 02:09:20 AM »
So, your "plate" that the ice wall sits on covers the whole of the underside of the earth too?
Do you not understand the legends? That is the crust, and the "plate" is part of the crust, just like the plates on a round Earth.

I can't comprehend your picture because it's utter dross. End of. Go back to school.
Then it's your problem that you can't comprehend pictures. Now, go back and revise plate tectonics. Actually, based on your reasoning, literacy, and comprehensive skills, I can only assume you're still a high school student. Get that high school geography textbook and read.
Jack, you really are a sad little frustrated boy. Get a life.
« Last Edit: November 29, 2007, 02:12:31 AM by lambie »

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #234 on: November 29, 2007, 02:44:46 AM »
Nice, what a strong argument you got there.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #235 on: November 29, 2007, 03:14:37 AM »
Nice, what a strong argument you got there.
it's true though  ;)