« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8   Go Down

plate tectonics

  • 235 Replies
  • 51672 Views
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-73
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #180 on: November 25, 2007, 02:51:25 PM »
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2007, 09:23:00 AM
I don't see the ice wall next to any hot stuff...
OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is. Plate tectonics and FE don't mix. You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
The flat earth has no boundries.
Logged
I!f you caan't argue both sids, yvoou yoou understand neither
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #181 on: November 25, 2007, 03:04:13 PM »
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is.
Right.

Quote
Plate tectonics and FE don't mix.
They seem to mix just fine to me...
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #182 on: November 25, 2007, 03:16:27 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2007, 03:04:13 PM
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is.
Right.
Has always been there? How did it form on the edge again rather than side out of the side of the disk? Things push up (mountains etc.) because of opposing forces. This is what forces plates under and over each other. The wall just kinda pushed against space in FE's case. Tom Bishop is doing a better job than you guys in this aspect.  :'(
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #183 on: November 25, 2007, 03:21:39 PM »
It's cold in space.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #184 on: November 25, 2007, 03:29:59 PM »
So earth-like material was more comfy and warm huddled up in a mound on the edge?
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #185 on: November 25, 2007, 03:32:35 PM »
Uh, what?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #186 on: November 25, 2007, 03:38:24 PM »
Logged
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #187 on: November 25, 2007, 05:45:47 PM »
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
Why?

Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 02:14:51 PM
:D
Good, we finally reach an agreement.
Logged
*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #188 on: November 25, 2007, 06:30:38 PM »
Quote from: Yiak on November 25, 2007, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2007, 03:04:13 PM
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is.
Right.
Has always been there? How did it form on the edge again rather than side out of the side of the disk? Things push up (mountains etc.) because of opposing forces. This is what forces plates under and over each other. The wall just kinda pushed against space in FE's case.
Land mass (in addition to ice) composes the icewall. If your saying 'space is cold' I assume this is to imply that the water from oceans freeze thus far out to form the wall or at least start it. The land mass is my concern though. The earthy material still would need to push against something.
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #189 on: November 25, 2007, 08:52:16 PM »
Molten rock + cold = solid rock
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #190 on: November 25, 2007, 11:50:16 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2007, 08:52:16 PM
Molten rock + cold = solid rock

So is it presumed that the FE is in a state of constant growth 'outward'?
Or is it assumed that this DID happen in the beginnings of Earth and then stopped, leaving the Ice Wall as it is?

Just clarification, not debating.
Thanks
Logged
Dyslexics are teople poo!
?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #191 on: November 26, 2007, 03:13:32 AM »
Quote from: Jack- on November 25, 2007, 05:45:47 PM
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
Why?

Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 02:14:51 PM
:D
Good, we finally reach an agreement.

What have we agreed?
Logged
*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #192 on: November 26, 2007, 04:58:36 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2007, 08:52:16 PM
Molten rock + cold = solid rock

And the sedimentary layers? And varying rock minerals that indicate multible origins?
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.
*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #193 on: November 26, 2007, 04:59:46 AM »
Quote from: Yiak link=topic=18166.msg324091#msg324091
And the sedimentary layers? And varying rock minerals that indicate multible origins?
[/quote
Scratch number two, I have no evidence of my own for that.  ::)
I saw the layers being counted on discovery channel.
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #194 on: November 26, 2007, 07:33:51 AM »
Quote from: Optimus Prime on November 25, 2007, 11:50:16 PM
So is it presumed that the FE is in a state of constant growth 'outward'?
No.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #195 on: November 26, 2007, 07:34:07 AM »
Quote from: Yiak on November 26, 2007, 04:58:36 AM
And the sedimentary layers?
What about them?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #196 on: November 26, 2007, 07:48:02 AM »
please could someone debating on the FE side of things draw a map of the earth 100m years ago, just to roughly show where the plates were.
Logged
?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #197 on: November 26, 2007, 07:58:25 AM »
Quote from: Username on November 25, 2007, 02:51:25 PM
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2007, 09:23:00 AM
I don't see the ice wall next to any hot stuff...
OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is. Plate tectonics and FE don't mix. You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
The flat earth has no boundries.

It does in the sense of plate tectonics, that's what this thread is about. What is the edge of the flat earth made of? The Ice Wall? A continental plate? Something else?
Logged
*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #198 on: November 26, 2007, 01:30:31 PM »
In answering my question... I have to agree here.

Even with a large oceanic expanse to move upon, the plates still need a 'barrier' of sorts to push against. Therefore, either the ice wall is still growing, or the plates are not moving anymore.

If molten rock + cold = solid rock (which it obviously does) then if the lava flows are active at even 10% of the ice wall, the Earth must still be growing outward, even if it is oblong.

OR it could be the plates are pushing all landmasses apart and expanding the earth in that fashion. Could this be the case?

Main thing is that new land is being formed everywhere, whether it be the sea floor or visibly above the water line. It must go somewhere...
Logged
Dyslexics are teople poo!
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #199 on: November 26, 2007, 06:16:33 PM »
Quote from: lambie on November 26, 2007, 03:13:32 AM
Quote from: Jack- on November 25, 2007, 05:45:47 PM
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
Why?

Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 02:14:51 PM
:D
Good, we finally reach an agreement.

What have we agreed?
Well, what don't you agree?
Logged
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-73
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #200 on: November 26, 2007, 06:30:04 PM »
Quote from: lambie on November 26, 2007, 07:58:25 AM
Quote from: Username on November 25, 2007, 02:51:25 PM
Quote from: lambie on November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2007, 09:23:00 AM
I don't see the ice wall next to any hot stuff...
OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is. Plate tectonics and FE don't mix. You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
The flat earth has no boundries.

It does in the sense of plate tectonics, that's what this thread is about. What is the edge of the flat earth made of? The Ice Wall? A continental plate? Something else?
No, it has no edge.
Logged
I!f you caan't argue both sids, yvoou yoou understand neither
*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #201 on: November 26, 2007, 08:19:46 PM »
I find that interesting. So if the earth has no edge, I want to clarify before I continue... do you mean to say the earth has infinite landmass? (Ice or no)

Logged
Dyslexics are teople poo!
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #202 on: November 26, 2007, 09:13:52 PM »
The Earth is not infinite.
Logged
*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #203 on: November 26, 2007, 09:33:01 PM »
Ok then, if it is not infinite, how can it have no edge? Is it some sort of dimensional shift that allows for thickness where there physically is none?

Sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but this one is slipping past me - I'm a bit tired and unless the earth tapers to a sharpened point, it has to have an edge somewhere if it's not infinite. And even then it still technically has an edge eh?

Have a good one all.
Logged
Dyslexics are teople poo!
?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #204 on: November 27, 2007, 01:39:02 AM »
it has no edge. Please can someone debating on the FE side explain the shape of the earth. Or haven't you all agreed on that yet?  ::)
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #205 on: November 27, 2007, 04:11:10 AM »
Quote from: lambie on November 27, 2007, 01:39:02 AM
Or haven't you all agreed on that yet?  ::)

Is that required? Ugh, I can't stand this shit.

Anyways, Tom has tried to say that it's infinite (and there were discussions about the possibilities this entails), but the general consensus is that it is finite.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #206 on: November 27, 2007, 04:29:03 AM »
Quote from: divito the truthist on November 27, 2007, 04:11:10 AM
Quote from: lambie on November 27, 2007, 01:39:02 AM
Or haven't you all agreed on that yet?  ::)

Is that required? Ugh, I can't stand this shit.

Anyways, Tom has tried to say that it's infinite (and there were discussions about the possibilities this entails), but the general consensus is that it is finite.
finite without an edge then?
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #207 on: November 27, 2007, 04:41:05 AM »
Well, there obviously has to be an edge if it's finite. I can't remember if Username subscribes to the infinite Earth idea.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #208 on: November 27, 2007, 04:45:26 AM »
Quote from: divito the truthist on November 27, 2007, 04:41:05 AM
Well, there obviously has to be an edge if it's finite. I can't remember if Username subscribes to the infinite Earth idea.
Well instead of worrying about that, answer me this. Is the continent of Antarctica connected to the same plate that the ice wall sits on?
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #209 on: November 27, 2007, 04:54:50 AM »
Quote from: lambie on November 27, 2007, 04:45:26 AM
Is the continent of Antarctica connected to the same plate that the ice wall sits on?

Depends on where the Ice Wall is actually located. Given that the Ice Wall hasn't been seen etc... I would guess that no, it isn't on the same plate.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8   Go Up
« previous next »