plate tectonics

  • 235 Replies
  • 51694 Views
?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #150 on: November 23, 2007, 12:39:18 PM »
come on Jack boy, where's you diagram. I need a good laugh.
You'll probably need to use a RE diagram as a base. A) because no FEer has ever studied plate tectonics before and B)because you know nothing about plate tectonics anyway. Only what you read up on between my posts

Way to make assumptions...and idiotic assumptions at that, anyone who's ever done science in school have studied plate tectonics.

Well let's just wait till we see the diagram hey.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #151 on: November 23, 2007, 12:45:14 PM »
The atmosphere slows them. mkay?
But they are still traveling at the speed of light through that medium.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #152 on: November 23, 2007, 02:18:01 PM »
Totally off topic but SparteX has been giving me a good laugh with radio waves and how they relate to the speed of light.

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #153 on: November 23, 2007, 02:52:18 PM »
In a vacuum radiowaves travel at c. in atmosphere, they are slowed. what's to understand?

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #154 on: November 23, 2007, 02:53:37 PM »
How fast does light travel in the atmosphere?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Ferruccio

  • 348
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #155 on: November 23, 2007, 03:07:18 PM »
In a vacuum radiowaves travel at c. in atmosphere, they are slowed. what's to understand?

radio waves are light, thus they always travel at the speed of light.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #156 on: November 23, 2007, 07:05:44 PM »
You're back. Have you just been reading up on plate tectonics on wikipedia or something ::)
Uh, I have school and work, unlike you.

Here's the Antarctic Plate [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:


Here's how the plates work [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:





?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #157 on: November 24, 2007, 06:39:43 AM »
omg, that's hilarious :P
Bye bye, I give up with you freaks

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-39
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #158 on: November 24, 2007, 06:42:46 AM »
omg, that's hilarious :P
Bye bye, I give up with you freaks

noooooooooo don't leave, I was just starting to like youuuuuuuuuuu
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #159 on: November 24, 2007, 06:45:21 AM »
Totally off topic but SparteX has been giving me a good laugh with radio waves and how they relate to the speed of light.

Me too. See my sig...
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

Miss M.

  • 1854
  • +0/-0
  • Screw you.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #160 on: November 24, 2007, 06:46:47 AM »
come on Jack boy, where's you diagram. I need a good laugh.
You'll probably need to use a RE diagram as a base. A) because no FEer has ever studied plate tectonics before and B)because you know nothing about plate tectonics anyway. Only what you read up on between my posts

Way to make assumptions...and idiotic assumptions at that, anyone who's ever done science in school have studied plate tectonics.
or even keystage 3 geography. :p
Quote from: TheEngineer
I happen to like GG.
Quote from: Z, the Enlightened.
I never thought in my life I'd write the sentence "I thought they were caught in a bipolar geodesic?"

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #161 on: November 24, 2007, 10:17:39 AM »
Sorry to be harsh guys. I don't know where to start with the diagram. Perhaps you could provide some evidence of your magical continuos divergent boundary that cirles the earth. The ice wall seems to be connected to the earth too. A while ago (in the same thread) it was floating in space.
How does this diagram fit in with the fact that Antarctica (somewhere near the ice wall?) hasn't always been on the edge of your map?

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #162 on: November 24, 2007, 10:19:23 AM »
The ice wall seems to be connected to the earth too. A while ago (in the same thread) it was floating in space.
It's the Earth that is floating in space.   ???

Quote
How does this diagram fit in with the fact that Antarctica (somewhere near the ice wall?) hasn't always been on the edge of your map?
Uh, yes it has...



"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #163 on: November 24, 2007, 10:47:12 AM »
For the subduction zones to be all the way around the ice wall. every other plate boundry would have to be kicking out magma.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #164 on: November 24, 2007, 03:23:49 PM »
The ice wall seems to be connected to the earth too. A while ago (in the same thread) it was floating in space.
It's the Earth that is floating in space.   ???

Quote
How does this diagram fit in with the fact that Antarctica (somewhere near the ice wall?) hasn't always been on the edge of your map?
Uh, yes it has...



In the real world, the continent of Antarctic hasn't always been where it is now. You can't deny that, it's a fact. The plates in the FE world don't seem to move.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #165 on: November 24, 2007, 04:02:56 PM »
Perhaps you could provide some evidence of your magical continuos divergent boundary that cirles the earth.
Raise some money, bring me to an underwater team, and I will show you the evidence.

The ice wall seems to be connected to the earth too. A while ago (in the same thread) it was floating in space.
The Ice Wall always connected to the Earth...

How does this diagram fit in with the fact that Antarctica (somewhere near the ice wall?) hasn't always been on the edge of your map?
Antarctica IS on the edge.

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #166 on: November 25, 2007, 04:31:06 AM »
The ice wall seems to be connected to the earth too. A while ago (in the same thread) it was floating in space.
It's the Earth that is floating in space.   ???

Quote
How does this diagram fit in with the fact that Antarctica (somewhere near the ice wall?) hasn't always been on the edge of your map?
Uh, yes it has...

No it hasn't, the southern tip of pangea became Antarctica, it hasn't always existed (in FE terms) as a circle surrounding the Earth

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #167 on: November 25, 2007, 04:59:47 AM »
Come on Chris, read.

How does this diagram fit in with the fact that Antarctica (somewhere near the ice wall?) hasn't always been on the edge of your map?
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #168 on: November 25, 2007, 08:34:35 AM »
Come on Chris, read.

How does this diagram fit in with the fact that Antarctica (somewhere near the ice wall?) hasn't always been on the edge of your map?

Chris is right. Actually my name is Chris, so I'm right too :D

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-39
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #169 on: November 25, 2007, 08:39:37 AM »
I'm glad you didnt leave :D FES needs more Chris's
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #170 on: November 25, 2007, 08:43:21 AM »
Where's Jack, I need a good laugh

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-39
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #171 on: November 25, 2007, 08:45:07 AM »
I dunno I'm not his minder
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #172 on: November 25, 2007, 08:46:37 AM »
Wasn't asking you Gayer

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-39
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #173 on: November 25, 2007, 08:47:16 AM »
But I felt like answering
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #174 on: November 25, 2007, 08:52:52 AM »
You're back. Have you just been reading up on plate tectonics on wikipedia or something ::)
Uh, I have school and work, unlike you.

Here's the Antarctic Plate [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:


Here's how the plates work [ILLUSTRATION AND APPROXIMATION ONLY]:






From you diagram, it looks like your ice wall is getting a bit too warm

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #175 on: November 25, 2007, 09:13:35 AM »
Too warm for what?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #176 on: November 25, 2007, 09:17:42 AM »
it's just a little unclear what the ice wall is connected to on the diagram. Looks like ice next to hot stuff = melty ice wall = no stupid FE

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #177 on: November 25, 2007, 09:23:00 AM »
I don't see the ice wall next to any hot stuff...


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #178 on: November 25, 2007, 09:27:40 AM »
I don't see the ice wall next to any hot stuff...
OH, I see. The ice wall is part of a plate. The one which doesn't seem to move, has always been where it is. Plate tectonics and FE don't mix. You can't have moving plates on a flat surface with boundaries.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2007, 02:14:01 PM by lambie »

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #179 on: November 25, 2007, 02:14:51 PM »
 :D