plate tectonics

  • 235 Replies
  • 51698 Views
?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #60 on: November 22, 2007, 04:14:30 PM »
it'd be like a sheet of ply board. So much force on it with so many weak points would tear it appart. a sphere has no week points, this is how the core is a solid sphere of iron and nuclear material
Who says the core has to be flat?
A sperical core would leave too much heat concentrated directly above it, leaving a lovely hole in the arctic.

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #61 on: November 22, 2007, 04:22:34 PM »
Good to know the forces that move the plates are covered.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #62 on: November 22, 2007, 04:49:27 PM »
it'd be like a sheet of ply board. So much force on it with so many weak points would tear it appart. a sphere has no week points, this is how the core is a solid sphere of iron and nuclear material
Who says the core has to be flat?
A sperical core would leave too much heat concentrated directly above it, leaving a lovely hole in the arctic.
You flip-flop worse than a politician.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

eric bloedow

Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #63 on: November 22, 2007, 04:49:36 PM »
check out this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seismograph

according to something i read (i forget where), large earthquakes can be sensed by seismographs all over the world. but when the differing times are measured, and compared to the known speed the vibrations travel, the result can ONLY be explained by a round earth!

(and that's not counting the waves that are said to "bounce" off the core!)

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #64 on: November 22, 2007, 05:08:32 PM »
A solid core which is maintained solid due to the immense pressure it is under, consisting of iron and nuclear material which is decaying to produce the heat necessary to maintain a liquid core. as the liquid core heats, it rises to the surface, where it cools. Then dropping back towards the earth's core, where it is re heated and rised again, making a convetion current. this constant current moves the plates.This is happening in all directions by the way.

Explain how this can happen on a flat earth

Convection is minor in the movement of the plates in comparison to things like slab pull.
Don't question me i studied geography and tectonics were my favourite subject funnily enough

LOL, I don't believe you, or you wouldn't keep calling the Earth a sphere when it's not.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #65 on: November 22, 2007, 05:38:38 PM »
A sperical core would leave too much heat concentrated directly above it, leaving a lovely hole in the arctic.

I would assume you meant like this:



You're saying that the smaller distance between the lithosphere and the core would cause melting? If so, explain.


?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #66 on: November 22, 2007, 05:41:23 PM »
I love your diagrams, Jack. Do you keep a catalog of them all? Maybe you should put them all into a thread in "Everything Else." Trekky could put all of his refraction ones in it. It could be called "Self Drawn Explanatory Diagrams" thread.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-73
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #67 on: November 22, 2007, 06:10:10 PM »
There is no reason the core could not be a flat layer.
If you can't arue both sidees, you understand undersftnd neither

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #68 on: November 23, 2007, 12:09:31 AM »
So, the ice wall is not connected to any of the RE plates?

Didn't my theory already explained how the Ice Wall forms? The Earth begun with an icy surface/frozen water. The Sun at the center melts the ice, all the way until the edge where the heat concentration is extremely low. Thus, Ice Wall. This wall is not really a wall; it is a mountain range covered in ice.
Exactly, so the land mass has always been at the boundary of the FE world. But, we know that Antarctica before around 100m years ago wasn't where it was now. There was no land mass in the south.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #69 on: November 23, 2007, 12:16:57 AM »
I love your diagrams, Jack. Do you keep a catalog of them all? Maybe you should put them all into a thread in "Everything Else." Trekky could put all of his refraction ones in it. It could be called "Self Drawn Explanatory Diagrams" thread.
Heh, thanks.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #70 on: November 23, 2007, 12:17:55 AM »
Exactly, so the land mass has always been at the boundary of the FE world.
Uh, what?

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #71 on: November 23, 2007, 12:38:00 AM »
the mountains at the edge (lol) of the earth, they've always been there ie. the plates on which the mountains sit have always been in the same place?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #72 on: November 23, 2007, 12:51:28 AM »
the mountains at the edge (lol) of the earth,
What about it?

they've always been there
Yes.

ie. the plates on which the mountains sit have always been in the same place?
Lithospheric activity causes the changes.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #73 on: November 23, 2007, 01:35:00 AM »
the mountains at the edge (lol) of the earth,
What about it?

they've always been there
Yes.

ie. the plates on which the mountains sit have always been in the same place?
Lithospheric activity causes the changes.

What do you mean by the last statement?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #74 on: November 23, 2007, 01:35:59 AM »
Plate tectonics.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #75 on: November 23, 2007, 01:37:37 AM »
so you think the Antarctic plate exists, but is a big ring round the edge?

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #76 on: November 23, 2007, 02:00:08 AM »
The edge of the FE is one giant ring plate.  As the outgoing plates contact this ring, they subduct at this location.  As the plate subducts, it is heated, melted and recycled.  Due to this subduction, the ice wall formed.

Wouldn't work. There would be a "surplus" of subduction, as on the FE map, the Antarctic plate would have a longer boundary than in the real world. There would have to be more divergent boundaries than actually exist.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2007, 02:39:17 AM by lambie »

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #77 on: November 23, 2007, 02:14:40 AM »
so you think the Antarctic plate exists, but is a big ring round the edge?
Yes.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #78 on: November 23, 2007, 02:20:26 AM »
see my last post then

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #79 on: November 23, 2007, 03:41:02 AM »
The edge of the FE is one giant ring plate.  As the outgoing plates contact this ring, they subduct at this location.  As the plate subducts, it is heated, melted and recycled.  Due to this subduction, the ice wall formed.

Wouldn't work. There would be a "surplus" of subduction, as on the FE map, the Antarctic plate would have a longer boundary than in the real world. There would have to be more divergent boundaries than actually exist.

answer that JACK?

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #80 on: November 23, 2007, 04:48:26 AM »
Instead of me explaining how a flat core wouldn't work. explain to me how one WOULD work.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #81 on: November 23, 2007, 05:05:49 AM »
The edge of the FE is one giant ring plate.  As the outgoing plates contact this ring, they subduct at this location.  As the plate subducts, it is heated, melted and recycled.  Due to this subduction, the ice wall formed.

Wouldn't work. There would be a "surplus" of subduction, as on the FE map, the Antarctic plate would have a longer boundary than in the real world. There would have to be more divergent boundaries than actually exist.

answer that JACK?

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #82 on: November 23, 2007, 05:25:41 AM »
well played.

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #83 on: November 23, 2007, 05:40:20 AM »
Another win for the REers then. Too easy.

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #84 on: November 23, 2007, 05:44:36 AM »
Another win for the REers then. Too easy.

You didn't win anything.  All of these posts have been done just today.  People have things to do, you know.

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #85 on: November 23, 2007, 05:46:47 AM »
yay

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #86 on: November 23, 2007, 05:48:01 AM »
flat core would work the same as a spherical core.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

lambie

  • 86
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #87 on: November 23, 2007, 05:49:40 AM »
flat core would work the same as a spherical core.

Answer the question. Don't just post random statements. A thread's like a conversation.

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #88 on: November 23, 2007, 05:50:05 AM »
flat core would work the same as a spherical core.
No it wouldnt. What would keep it from becoming liquid without equal forces from every direction.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: plate tectonics
« Reply #89 on: November 23, 2007, 05:51:28 AM »
I believe that Jacks diagram is wrong. In actuality, there would be a 'flat' core. Basically a layer of crust, a layer of mantle, a layer of solid inner core.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness