Universal Gravitation

  • 74 Replies
  • 12598 Views
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #30 on: November 20, 2007, 01:39:44 PM »
i consider it more absurd than "dark energy", which is in turn extremely absurd compared to gravity.

if some scientist creates some "dark matter" in a laboratory, i might believe in it.

You should read the book Hyperspace.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #31 on: November 20, 2007, 03:31:58 PM »
yeah, right. then it would also block the DE from the moon, making the moon accellerate slower and crash into earth!
Why would it block it from the Moon? 


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Gigano

  • 58
  • +0/-0
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #32 on: November 20, 2007, 03:34:51 PM »
Always asking questions to other people, always restating your statements.

There is no depth or actual science in this theory... It's all just unsupported speculation.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #33 on: November 20, 2007, 03:49:07 PM »
Eric does not seem to stick to actual physics, but instead relies on making it up on the spot.  It makes it very hard to follow along with just about any argument he makes.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

eric bloedow

Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #34 on: November 20, 2007, 05:44:01 PM »
YOU are the one making stuff up! I am just pointing out how YOUR wild guesses contradict things ANYONE can look at with a telescope!

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #35 on: November 20, 2007, 05:45:09 PM »
What about the telescope?

?

eric bloedow

Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #36 on: November 20, 2007, 06:09:10 PM »
just watch jupiter's moons, like Galileo did, and you will see gravity at work.

also notice that jupiter is round.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #37 on: November 20, 2007, 06:22:23 PM »
No, you'll see gravitation at work.  And nobody has disputed that Jupiter is round.  Why is the shape of the celestial bodies constantly brought up as if they somehow proved something about the shape of the earth?
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #38 on: November 20, 2007, 06:32:40 PM »
just leave eric the n00b alone roundy ::)
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #39 on: November 20, 2007, 06:49:03 PM »
just watch jupiter's moons, like Galileo did, and you will see gravity at work.

also notice that jupiter is round.
Yes, the moons are following the curved geometry of space-time created by Jupiter. Sounds nothing like the force of gravity to me.

What about that Jupiter is round?

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #40 on: November 21, 2007, 07:33:42 AM »
String theory posits 10 dimensions, not 11.

"String theory is thought to include some 10, 11, or 26 dimensions, depending on the specific theory and on the point of view."
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #41 on: November 21, 2007, 07:37:38 AM »
Gravitation of Jupiter and its moons is an example to be extended to all masses. Gravitation for Earth for instance. In addition to acceleration, Earth's mass should curve spacetime and create more 'apparent' force for observers on the surface. No?
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #42 on: November 21, 2007, 08:20:26 AM »
No.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

Gigano

  • 58
  • +0/-0
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #43 on: November 21, 2007, 09:39:31 AM »
No.

That's the most laughable answer on the forums ever...

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #44 on: November 21, 2007, 10:08:38 AM »
LOL - It was a yes/no question, and I gave a yes/no answer.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

Gigano

  • 58
  • +0/-0
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #45 on: November 21, 2007, 10:33:56 AM »
LOL - It was a yes/no question, and I gave a yes/no answer.

Even if it's a yes/no question, you should always support your answer.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #46 on: November 21, 2007, 10:35:04 AM »
No one asked me to support my answer, so why should I?
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

Gigano

  • 58
  • +0/-0
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #47 on: November 21, 2007, 10:39:23 AM »
No one asked me to support my answer, so why should I?

If you were to ask: do you believe in God? And I just said 'no', that person will want to know why.

Same goes for most science related questions as well.

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #48 on: November 21, 2007, 10:40:19 AM »
If they want to know why, they will ask. So far no one has asked. Just said it was dumb.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

eric bloedow

Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #49 on: November 21, 2007, 02:39:11 PM »
i said this before:

the sun is round
the moon is round
mercury is round
venus is round
mars is round
jupiter and all of it's moons are round
saturn and all of it's moons are round
uranus is round
neptune is round
pluto is round

THEREFORE EARTH IS FLAT, say FErs!
pfffffft...

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #50 on: November 21, 2007, 02:56:31 PM »
 ::)
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #51 on: November 21, 2007, 04:57:55 PM »
i said this before:

the sun is round
the moon is round
mercury is round
venus is round
mars is round
jupiter and all of it's moons are round
saturn and all of it's moons are round
uranus is round
neptune is round
pluto is round

THEREFORE EARTH IS FLAT, say FErs!
pfffffft...
The flat Earth is special.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #52 on: November 21, 2007, 05:05:33 PM »
i said this before:

the sun is round
the moon is round
mercury is round
venus is round
mars is round
jupiter and all of it's moons are round
saturn and all of it's moons are round
uranus is round
neptune is round
pluto is round

THEREFORE EARTH IS FLAT, say FErs!
pfffffft...


Your analogy would be correct if the earth was a celestial body. However, it is not. The earth is an infinite plane which cuts the universe in half. Therefore there is no comparison to the rotundity of other bodies in the cosmos above our heads.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #53 on: November 21, 2007, 05:09:29 PM »
Your analogy would be correct if the earth was a celestial body. However, it is not. The earth is an infinite plane which cuts the universe in half. Therefore there is no comparison to the rotundity of other bodies in the cosmos above our heads.
No.

?

eric bloedow

Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #54 on: November 21, 2007, 05:10:26 PM »
infinite? yeah, right. if it's infinite, how could it ACCELLERATE? it would have infinite mass!

?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #55 on: November 21, 2007, 05:12:22 PM »
i said this before:

the sun is round
the moon is round
mercury is round
venus is round
mars is round
jupiter and all of it's moons are round
saturn and all of it's moons are round
uranus is round
neptune is round
pluto is round

THEREFORE EARTH IS FLAT, say FErs!
pfffffft...


Your analogy would be correct if the earth was a celestial body. However, it is not. The earth is an infinite plane which cuts the universe in half. Therefore there is no comparison to the rotundity of other bodies in the cosmos above our heads.
bold for stupidity
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-81
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #56 on: November 21, 2007, 05:41:43 PM »
infinite? yeah, right. if it's infinite, how could it ACCELLERATE? it would have infinite mass!
And it would have infininite energy to accelerate it...
If you ca't argue both sdes, you understand neither

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #57 on: November 21, 2007, 05:58:32 PM »
I don't think the earth is an infinite plane.  It almost defies reason.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #58 on: November 21, 2007, 07:33:09 PM »
I don't think the earth is an infinite plane.  It almost defies reason.

Infinity is a hard concept to grasp, I agree. But the Round Earth Theory also holds that the universe may be infinite. Therefore; we have a potentially infinite universe in either model.

Technically, if Space-Time is flat then the universe and the earth will stretch out perpetually. If the Space-Time is curved then the earth and universe will eventually wrap back around itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curved_space
« Last Edit: November 21, 2007, 08:19:52 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

eric bloedow

Re: Universal Gravitation
« Reply #59 on: November 21, 2007, 08:51:12 PM »
so once again you are calling every single person who has crossed antartica a liar.

oh, and if space-time is warped enough...then your infinite earth would be round!