Questions for Clarification.

Quote from: SparteX on November 24, 2007, 12:48:14 PM

avoided the question AGAIN. getting good at this aren't you.

And you avoided mine.

I don't know the answer to it, do you? The closest I've seen is inference.

And again, what does that have to do with our discussion? What does it prove?

Dark Energy wasn't an FE concoction, so I don't see the point in bringing it up how it is detected in here.

It was a theoretical concoction made to explain how the universe has the mass to expand so fast.

Once again answered a question with a question.

i was saying how do you know there is a dark energy field with no way of detecting it.

also if it's dark energy accellerating the planet how does it hold the atmosphere in?

The Dark Energy Field is a vector field.  It has a gradient that is smallest at the interaction of the atmosphere and the field, called the boundary layer.  The DEF interacts with the magnetic field of the earth at this boundary layer.  These vectors produce a force vector that is orthogonal to the other vectors in four dimensional space.  This force vector is always normal to the boundary layer, thus providing a type of forced containment for the atmosphere.

a fourth dimension is only theoretical, it has yet to be discovered.

We live in four dimensions, at a minimum.

a fourth dimension is only theoretical, it has yet to be discovered.

Time is often considered the fourth. Therefore we live in four.

a fourth dimension is only theoretical, it has yet to be discovered.

Ever heard of "space-time"?

Quote from: SparteX on November 24, 2007, 11:38:02 AM

then why do others in FE believe it does.

Why do people believe in different religions? Like different foods? Drive different cars?

Honestly, where do you come up with these questions?

but in RE theory's are widely accepted or not accepted atall , this seems different in FE though because all FE'er seem to have different theory's

but in RE theory's are widely accepted or not accepted atall , this seems different in FE though because all FE'er seem to have different theory's

Do you honestly expect us to know how to detect Dark Energy, know what's beyond the uncharted tundra of the south, and know precisely how the cosmos work?

Quote from: divito the truthist on November 24, 2007, 12:27:35 PM

Quote from: SparteX on November 24, 2007, 11:38:02 AM

then why do others in FE believe it does.

Why do people believe in different religions? Like different foods? Drive different cars?

Honestly, where do you come up with these questions?

but in RE theory's are widely accepted or not accepted atall , this seems different in FE though because all FE'er seem to have different theory's

No, any new field is widely debated and not accepted by all.
FE theory is not that developed for obvious reasons and so there are many different views of how it works. As subjects grow more debated and more proof is found, acceptance will grow.

Quote

but in RE theory's are widely accepted or not accepted atall , this seems different in FE though because all FE'er seem to have different theory's

Do you honestly expect us to know how to detect Dark Energy, know what's beyond the uncharted tundra of the south, and know precisely how the cosmos work?

if u cant detect it , don't know how it works then why do you assume its in the FE theory ? o that's right because people can't disprove you because no 1 knows what its about .. good tactic.

if u cant detect it , don't know how it works then why do you assume its in the FE theory ? o that's right because people can't disprove you because no 1 knows what its about .. good tactic.

Same can be said of the RE's Dark Energy.

Quote from: tommo on November 26, 2007, 09:52:45 AM

if u cant detect it , don't know how it works then why do you assume its in the FE theory ? o that's right because people can't disprove you because no 1 knows what its about .. good tactic.

Same can be said of the RE's Dark Energy.

ive never heard of RE's theory of dark energy though , could you direct me to a link about it ?

Lol. Googling things is hard for noobs.

Lol, n00bs.

i only had a quick look at that , but it seems dark energy is all about accelerating and expanding universe , not accelerating a object (FE)

Well, the flat Earth floats in what again? [Hint: the universe]

Well, the flat Earth floats in what again? [Hint: the universe]

so do all the other planets accelerate then ?

Yes.

i only had a quick look at that , but it seems dark energy is all about accelerating and expanding universe , not accelerating a object (FE)

I don't remember saying otherwise.

Yes.

Hence, Universal Acceleration

Quote from: SparteX on November 22, 2007, 04:06:42 PM

I am a scientist.

So, what field are you specialized in?

I was really hoping for an answer...

He's already shown that he's nothing close to one by his lame arguments and that thing about the radio waves and light thing. And if he really is one, I hope that nothing he does has anything to do with the well-being of other people.

One could publish a Humourous book about stupid things people say about light.

He's already shown that he's nothing close to one by his lame arguments and that thing about the radio waves and light thing. And if he really is one, I hope that nothing he does has anything to do with the well-being of other people.

But that's why it'd be fun to get an answer.

One could publish a Humourous book about stupid things people say about light.

That would go down a storm in any physics department staff room at any university in the world.

Yes.

so the hole univerise (sun , earth , venus , other planets) are all accelerating upwards and not orbiting anything ?

Quote from: Jack. on November 28, 2007, 12:53:30 PM

Yes.

so the hole univerise (sun , earth , venus , other planets) are all accelerating upwards and not orbiting anything ?

Mostly everything is accelerating upwards.  I believe there are FE models that hold orbit to be occurring.

Mostly everything is accelerating upwards.  I believe there are FE models that hold orbit to be occurring.

fair enough , how dose FE explain planets moving in front of the sun ?

Unsure.  Try a search; I'm sure it's been discussed.