Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.

  • 45 Replies
  • 7232 Views
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #30 on: November 14, 2007, 12:46:04 PM »
You RE'ers run away without presenting any evidence or mathematics. You guys are a funny lot.
By this post we should assume that
a) you can not read.
b) you can not understand the terms "evidence" or "mathematics".
c) you think you're cool by claiming such nonsense. Well that failed.

I don't see why you are trying to prove us so desperately that you are an idiot. But i guess it's your own choice.


*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #31 on: November 14, 2007, 12:53:01 PM »
I predict at least 30 pages in this thread.  ::)
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #32 on: November 14, 2007, 12:54:33 PM »
has anyone stopped for a second and thought that maybe earth's gravitational pull might negate this gyroscopic effects on anything.
an vir

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #33 on: November 14, 2007, 12:55:25 PM »
I predict at least 30 pages in this thread.  ::)
Yeah, the REers do have a scary tendency to keep bumping narcberry's threads.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #34 on: November 14, 2007, 01:00:57 PM »
Myself included.  ;D


bump.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #35 on: November 14, 2007, 02:28:44 PM »
I predict at least 30 pages in this thread.  ::)
Yeah, the REers do have a scary tendency to keep bumping narcberry's threads.

Whose narberry?
I turned my signatures off because they make threads hard to read. I can't even see this when I post, please tell me what I said here.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #36 on: November 14, 2007, 02:38:23 PM »
I predict at least 30 pages in this thread.  ::)
Yeah, the REers do have a scary tendency to keep bumping narcberry's threads.

Whose narberry?
Yours or mine, I don't care.  Although, I have not used my narberry in some time...


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #37 on: November 14, 2007, 06:14:10 PM »
By what mechanism would all these atoms and molecules conserve such enormous quantities of angular momentum rather than losing it through friction etc?

That's one big fat shout of "Bullshit!" btw.
I would assume he meant in a closed system, momentum is conserved. Initial momentum equals to final momentum, given that no external forces act on the object(s). Therefore, as stated by the laws of conservation, momentum is a conserved quantity.

Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #38 on: November 14, 2007, 08:59:52 PM »
The oceans aren't weightless, you moron!  They're not weightless!  They weigh a lot!  They wouldn't float away on a RE!!!

You haven't proven anything!  The oceans AREN'T WEIGHTLESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!










Huh?

What?

WHAT?!

I'm a week late for that thread?!?!

Goddamnit.   :'(

*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #39 on: November 14, 2007, 11:11:40 PM »
Trustee,

Narcberry changed his name to "Smarticuss" and then to "I won. goodbye".
He started this thread.

He probably changed it so that searches on narcberry wouldn't reveal his past embarrassments for arguments. He once argued that the shape of your shoes proof the flatness of the Earth...  ;D
« Last Edit: November 14, 2007, 11:15:25 PM by Yiak »
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #40 on: November 15, 2007, 01:49:34 AM »
By what mechanism would all these atoms and molecules conserve such enormous quantities of angular momentum rather than losing it through friction etc?

That's one big fat shout of "Bullshit!" btw.
I would assume he meant in a closed system, momentum is conserved. Initial momentum equals to final momentum, given that no external forces act on the object(s). Therefore, as stated by the laws of conservation, momentum is a conserved quantity.
Hmm. Doesn't the Earth spin in the opposite direction to it's orbit?
Quote from: Tom Bishop
tell me how your model explains why deep-dripping Russian geologists found an impenetrable layer of turtle shell when attempting to breach the crust of the earth.

?

eric bloedow

Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #41 on: November 15, 2007, 09:02:08 PM »
hmm...good point, i forget which way it is.

(of course, FErs claim the earth stays still and the sun moves in a big circle every single day...)

?

Genmotty

  • 46
  • If I go that way I end up where I began
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #42 on: November 16, 2007, 12:40:13 PM »
Quote
You haven't proven anything!  The oceans AREN'T WEIGHTLESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well actaully...

Let's look at some basic maths again. F=ma

That is your oceans are weightless when not subject to some form of accelaration. Hence you should have stated Massless  ::).

I'm just a know all,
Genmotty
[Space for rent]

?

eric bloedow

Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #43 on: November 16, 2007, 06:07:54 PM »
try filling a bucket with water and swinging it around: if water really is massless, you could swing it just as easily as if it was empty.

try it yourself!

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #44 on: March 29, 2008, 09:39:13 PM »
I love that no RE'er can contradict this.

*

Kill-9

  • 692
  • House Shaped Earth Proponent
Re: Surface tension breaks RE model predictions.
« Reply #45 on: March 29, 2008, 11:42:06 PM »
I love that no RE'er can contradict this.
REad this thread. It will enlighten you and give you the answers you seek!
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=18040.0
Quote from: Tom Bishop
(random horseshit that doesn't make sense)
Quote from: Viscount Dead Kangaroo
I spend half the day with a dick in my mouth