I said man can and has gone into space. Again, if you're going to ignore the FACTS, then why should I (or anybody else, for that matter) bother to read any FE "literature?"
Sure, I agree that man has been to space. In FE there is lagrange point between the stars and the earth where bodies can become weightless, trapped between the gravitation of the stars and the acceleration of the earth. Reaching this point is what can cause the weightlessness seen in space shuttle videos.
The earth appears curved at an altitude of 100 miles. Most pictures of the earth are not doctored. Flat Earth Theory holds that there is elliptical curvature from the edge of space, one hundred miles in altitude. Any photograph showing a curved elliptical horizon from very high altitudes poses no affront to FE.
Example:
http://www.natrium42.com/halo/flight2/Curvature results from the fact that on a flat earth we are looking down at a flat circle. And a circle is always curved in two dimensions. The Antarctic coast and other distant continents of the earth are still tens of thousands of miles away horizontally from the observer at an altitude of 100 miles (edge of space), and thus beyond the resolution of the human eye and merged with the line of the horizon, indiscernible and faded with the thickness of the atmosphere. This is why the view is limited to the immediate vicinity below the observer, and why the land fades into a blueish fog as it recedes.
We can confirm that we are looking down at the circle of the earth by noting that shots from amateur high altitude balloons show an elliptical horizon. If the earth were a globe, curving downwards in three dimensions, all curvature seen in photographs would appear as an arc of a circle. However, curvature does not appear as an arc of a circle. The Earth is elliptical in Russian, Chinese, and amateur space photographs. A striking indication of a Flat Earth.
The only pictures which show the horizon as an arc of a circle are NASA's Apollo shots. The Apollo missions did not occur.