the space shuttle "conspiracy"

  • 150 Replies
  • 39663 Views
?

eric bloedow

Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #120 on: November 22, 2007, 01:36:39 PM »
i'm still waiting for an answer...

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #121 on: November 22, 2007, 03:35:56 PM »
It's a conspiracy. Dumbshoe
Dumbshoe

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #122 on: November 22, 2007, 03:37:16 PM »
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

eric bloedow

Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #123 on: November 22, 2007, 03:55:28 PM »
ok, consider the LOGISTICAL problems of the "floating platform" theory: that is, keeping it supplied with food, fresh water, fuel for the shuttle, etc., while hiding ALL of that from EVERYONE...

even if "the conspiracy" had a secret seaport, they would still have to get all of that from the farms, refineries, etc to the seaport, which would be noticed!

and that's assuming nobody saw the fence and the "no trespassing" signs around the port and wondered who it belonged to...
and that's not even considering the problems of passing airplanes or coast guard ships seeing it!

i'm still waiting for a meaningful answer: "it's a conspiracy" is just hot air!

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #124 on: November 22, 2007, 03:58:45 PM »
If the shuttle never leaves earth then why do we see it burning up as it re enters at 17,000 mph

?

eric bloedow

Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #125 on: November 24, 2007, 06:37:12 PM »
yes, that would be very hard to fake!

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #126 on: November 24, 2007, 11:22:21 PM »
Maybe they set it on fire.  ::)
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #127 on: November 24, 2007, 11:28:03 PM »
If the shuttle never leaves earth then why do we see it burning up as it re enters at 17,000 mph

It's most likely a rock fallen from space.

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #128 on: November 25, 2007, 01:56:36 AM »
a rock which then lands and morphs into a space shuttle? Come on, you have to do better than that, people watch it the whole way down...
Dumbshoe

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #129 on: November 25, 2007, 02:06:06 AM »
The space shuttle is probably just a stratospheric aircraft.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-81
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #130 on: November 25, 2007, 02:09:12 AM »
I don't see why you think it would be hard to fake something like that.
If you can't argue both sides, yo uknderstand neither

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #131 on: November 25, 2007, 02:11:05 AM »
then please explain to me how you would go about doing it
Dumbshoe

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #132 on: November 25, 2007, 02:12:04 AM »
Doing what?

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #133 on: November 25, 2007, 02:13:13 AM »
turning a rock into a space shuttle whilst people are watching
Dumbshoe

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #134 on: November 25, 2007, 02:13:46 AM »
How would a rock turn into a space shuttle?

*

paradiselost

  • 191
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #135 on: November 25, 2007, 02:15:18 AM »
I don't see why you think it would be hard to fake something like that.

I presume he is talking about the fact that i said how impossible it would be for a rock to turn into a space shuttle (read the post above it)
Dumbshoe

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #136 on: November 25, 2007, 06:23:30 AM »
If the shuttle never leaves earth then why do we see it burning up as it re enters at 17,000 mph

It's most likely a rock fallen from space.
Rocks leave dust and smoke trails. Silicone based ceramic tiles don't.

?

eric bloedow

Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #137 on: November 25, 2007, 08:57:32 AM »
the space shuttle comes back down at 17,000 miles an hour, making a big trail of flames anyone can see from the ground.

but if it was supposedly hiding on the ground just before that, how would they get it up to 17,000 miles an hour without anyone on earth seeing or HEARING it going up?!

(rockets are VERY noisy!)

*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #138 on: November 25, 2007, 02:52:16 PM »
the space shuttle comes back down at 17,000 miles an hour, making a big trail of flames anyone can see from the ground.

but if it was supposedly hiding on the ground just before that, how would they get it up to 17,000 miles an hour without anyone on earth seeing or HEARING it going up?!

(rockets are VERY noisy!)

I read the first page and the last one... Something doesn't fit with you two arguing.

Quote from: Jack-
NASA did [go] to space.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

?

Bytes

  • 145
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #139 on: November 26, 2007, 09:56:18 AM »
Every one thinks moon landings, space shuttle, space travel in general etc were fake is a disgrace to the human race. There are astronauts(US and Russian) who gave their lives to space exploration.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #140 on: November 27, 2007, 07:08:55 AM »
Bit silly of them to give their lives for something that's fake...




*awaits the inevitable backlash from stupid people*
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

tommo

  • 505
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #141 on: November 27, 2007, 07:55:36 AM »
Bit silly of them to give their lives for something that's fake...

bit silly to believe in a worlds that flat
Quote from: jack
I'm special.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #142 on: November 27, 2007, 07:59:55 AM »
Bit silly of them to give their lives for something that's fake...

Bit silly to believe in a world that's round.

Don't worry, I corrected your sentence for you. No need to thank me.
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #143 on: November 27, 2007, 12:07:17 PM »
Bit silly of them to give their lives for something that's fake...
Bit silly to believe in a world that's flat.
Jackie Chan is H-O-T!!!
Fixed.  ;)
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #144 on: November 27, 2007, 12:26:26 PM »
Every one thinks moon landings, space shuttle, space travel in general etc were fake is a disgrace to the human race. There are astronauts(US and Russian) who gave their lives to space exploration.

Take your fallacies elsewhere.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

Bytes

  • 145
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #145 on: November 27, 2007, 12:44:26 PM »
Every one thinks moon landings, space shuttle, space travel in general etc were fake is a disgrace to the human race. There are astronauts(US and Russian) who gave their lives to space exploration.

Take your fallacies elsewhere.

Sure thing
http://www.goingfaster.com/icarus/all_the_dead_heroes.htm

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #146 on: November 27, 2007, 01:14:47 PM »
You're all wrong! the world is cube!


?

eric bloedow

Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #147 on: November 29, 2007, 03:26:40 PM »
i still haven't gotten an answer: the shuttle would have to make a second, secret takeoff before it's public landing (if it's faked). so just how would it avoid seeing people on the ground seeing it going UP?

?

Bytes

  • 145
  • +0/-0
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #148 on: November 29, 2007, 04:38:17 PM »
i still haven't gotten an answer: the shuttle would have to make a second, secret takeoff before it's public landing (if it's faked). so just how would it avoid seeing people on the ground seeing it going UP?

You will never get a straight answer that is also sane to this. We all know why.

*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: the space shuttle "conspiracy"
« Reply #149 on: November 29, 2007, 04:47:30 PM »
Make the wings and tail collapsible. Then make a large aircraft that resembles something like a C-10 or the like that when in flight could be easily mistaken for a standard cargo plane.

Get up to altitude way out over the ocean, some place it will be most unlikely for you to be seen at high altitude, open the bay doors and drop the sucker!!

Hey, it could happen! ;D

Dyslexics are teople poo!