« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Earth's Acceleration

  • 69 Replies
  • 9483 Views
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Earth's Acceleration
« on: October 25, 2007, 01:29:56 PM »
If the Earth moves at 1g (I have no clue what 1g means) then how can we still see the other planets?  Do they all follow Earth around?
Logged
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2007, 01:36:58 PM »
The celestial bodies are also being accelerated by the UA in the common FE theory. 

I suggest reading the faq.
Logged
i.f you can't argue both sides, you understand neither
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2007, 01:38:28 PM »
I did skim through it but being a RE'er, i don't have the time reading all the details of a myth... a irrational myth at that.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2007, 01:39:43 PM »
But you had time to make this thread?

Please read the FAQ.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2007, 01:42:08 PM »
Ok, I re-read that part and found it.  So I guess that the planets don't revolve then.
Logged
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2007, 01:42:59 PM »
STOP MAKING THREADS.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2007, 01:43:05 PM »
How did you reach that conclusion from reading about the acceleration of the FE?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2007, 01:45:18 PM »
Wouldn't the planet's crash if they rotated?
Logged
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2007, 01:48:03 PM »
The reason why i am making so many threads is because I am trying to make my point.
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2007, 01:49:52 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 01:45:18 PM
Wouldn't the planet's crash if they rotated?

LOL.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2007, 01:50:02 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 01:48:03 PM
The reason why i am making so many threads is because I am trying to make my point.

That's you're lazy?  :-\
Logged
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2007, 01:51:16 PM »
how does that make me lazy?
Logged
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2007, 01:52:18 PM »
too lazy to use the search button
Logged
i.f you can't argue both sides, you understand neither
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2007, 01:52:48 PM »
Not taking the time to read the FAQ.
Logged
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2007, 01:53:40 PM »
No, I'm not lazy.... I'm smart since I know that EARTH IS ROUND!!!
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2007, 01:54:51 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
No, I'm not lazy.... I'm smart since I know that EARTH IS ROUND!!!

If you were smart, you'd realize the flaw in this statement.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2007, 01:55:20 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
No, I'm not lazy.... I'm smart since I know that EARTH IS ROUND!!!

But that wouldn't make someone smart...
Logged
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2007, 01:57:29 PM »
Yes, there was a flaw. I noticed it and fixed it.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2007, 01:59:11 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 01:45:18 PM
Wouldn't the planet's crash if they rotated?
Why would they?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2007, 02:00:50 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 01:48:03 PM
The reason why i am making so many threads is because I am trying to make my point.
What's funny, is that the point you are making is probably not the one you are intending to make.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2007, 02:03:20 PM »
The planets wouldn't crash... I just said that because it would be impossible (since it would have happened already) and the rest of the stuff on here is impossible (unless it is proof the earth is round)
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2007, 02:04:02 PM »
How about explaining your position?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #22 on: October 25, 2007, 02:06:48 PM »
What do you mean?  I am a RE'er.  Nothing on here is logical.  Is that what you are asking?
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #23 on: October 25, 2007, 02:08:11 PM »
I'm asking you to explain your assumption that accelerating, rotating bodies would have crashed into each other by now.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #24 on: October 25, 2007, 02:10:19 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 01:57:29 PM
Yes, there was a flaw. I noticed it and fixed it.

Nope, it's still there. Perhaps you should use that intelligent brain to find it.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #25 on: October 25, 2007, 02:11:03 PM »
Never mind... I was just trying to make a point that nothing here makes sense.
Logged
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #26 on: October 25, 2007, 02:11:51 PM »
What's the flaw?
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #27 on: October 25, 2007, 02:13:41 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 02:11:03 PM
Never mind... I was just trying to make a point that nothing here makes sense.
You were trying to make a point that the site does not make sense, by not making sense yourself?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

JNB228

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #28 on: October 25, 2007, 02:14:58 PM »
Just ignore what I said.
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Earth's Acceleration
« Reply #29 on: October 25, 2007, 02:18:15 PM »
Quote from: JNB228 on October 25, 2007, 02:11:51 PM
What's the flaw?

Besides that terming the Earth round is inaccurate, you claim to know something you can't possibly know without invoking a fallacy. Even if you were to try and avoid that, the simple matter is that it can't be proven.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »