Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?

Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM

As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.

Gravity doesn't exist

He didn't say anything about gravity.

Just because I corrected myself doesn't mean I'm retracting my statement. If the heavens are being pulled toward the earth, the UA must affect all the celestial bodies arbitrarily to account for each individual body's gravitational effect. Am i wrong?

Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 26, 2007, 06:38:10 PM

Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM

As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.

Gravity doesn't exist

He didn't say anything about gravity.

Can you read?

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 26, 2007, 08:00:54 PM

Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 26, 2007, 06:38:10 PM

Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM

As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.

Gravity doesn't exist

He didn't say anything about gravity.

Can you read?

Yes, and he didn't say anything about gravity.

This is just ridiculous. Can we please not get into the same god damn pedantic back and forth? It's really getting old. WE ALL KNOW WHAT THE OTHER MEANS.

Aye. Please move the argument that will undoubtedly ensue to the gravity: a repost thread.

Some people get so sensitive about gravity. This site is becoming my new entertainment.

It's GRAVITATION! God damn you!

It's GRAVITATION! God damn you!

Yay!

Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 27, 2007, 11:40:11 AM

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 26, 2007, 08:00:54 PM

Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 26, 2007, 06:38:10 PM

Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM

As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.

Gravity doesn't exist

He didn't say anything about gravity.

Can you read?

Yes, and he didn't say anything about gravity.

He said gravitation. According to the FakE model, the only gravitation comes from UA.
However, if it gonna counteract the UA, it has to go up. What else but gravity

He said gravitation. According to the FakE model, the only gravitation comes from UA.
However, if it gonna counteract the UA, it has to go up. What else but gravity

Counteracting the UA?

Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 27, 2007, 03:33:38 PM

He said gravitation. According to the FakE model, the only gravitation comes from UA.
However, if it gonna counteract the UA, it has to go up. What else but gravity

Counteracting the UA?

To decrease weight a force in the opposite direction of gravitation would be needed.

You mean gravitation from the stars?

You mean gravitation from the stars?

Yes. What else?

I was confused, as you brought up gravity.

Right, so why isnt the UA accelerating towards the birds that are flying above our heads?

because the birds are also accelerating when they are flying. just take a look with there wings as they fly around, they preventing themselves to crush in the earth due to the acceleration of the UA.

because the birds are also accelerating when they are flying. just take a look with there wings as they fly around, they preventing themselves to crush in the earth due to the acceleration of the UA.

Now I know...

I know that you dont know how wings work.

Anyway, if what you say is correct, it means that the birds must fly upwards while accelerating at an upwards velocity of about 9.8 m/s/s?

Amazing.

Now, how do free falling parachutes work? If UA is correct, why isnt the Earth accelerating upwards towards the free falling parachutes at about 9.8 m/s/s? The air resistances wouldnt matter if Earth is going upwards.

I was confused, as you brought up gravity.

Where does the stars gravitation come from?
Can't be gravity if it doesn't exist.
And it can't be UA.

The air resistances wouldnt matter if Earth is going upwards.

The earth is accelerating the air.  Therefore, air resistance.

Where does the stars gravitation come from?

The deformation of space, and the fact that we are in their geodesics.

Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 28, 2007, 10:28:34 AM

Where does the stars gravitation come from?

The deformation of space, and the fact that we are in their geodesics.

Geodesic is the notion of a straight line to curved space.

Being "inside" it would not decrease weight.

BTW, curved and/or deformed space IS gravity.

Geodesic is the notion of a straight line to curved space.

Being "inside" it would not decrease weight.

Yea, it sure would.

BTW, curved and/or deformed space IS gravity.

No, it's gravitation.

Quote

BTW, curved and/or deformed space IS gravity.

No, it's gravitation.

You have got to be the most whiny little girl I've ever encountered on an Internet forum.

I'm assuming you know the definition of the word pedantic.

Stop acting like an idiot.

You have got to be the most whiny little girl I've ever encountered on an Internet forum.

But, I'm not a girl.

I'm assuming you know the definition of the word pedantic.

Yes.

Stop acting like an idiot.

When did I start?

Quote from: ChiefConspirator on October 28, 2007, 11:09:43 AM

You have got to be the most whiny little girl I've ever encountered on an Internet forum.

But, I'm not a girl.

I'm assuming you know the definition of the word hyperbole.

Quote

I'm assuming you know the definition of the word pedantic.

Yes.

Then you understand the gripe everybody in the thread has with you. Stop acting like it's something else.

Quote

Stop acting like an idiot.

When did I start?

If you want to be treated like an adult in an Internet forum, stop acting like you need to have every last detail literally spelled out for you before you respond to it. That's what children do, or idiotic adults. Don't act like you have no idea what "all the fuss is about." You're smart enough to figure out why people are bothered with the tack you're taking in this discussion. Why not stop acting like a child, and address it? In case you're not smart enough, we all think you're being unnecessarily pedantic.

Quote

BTW, curved and/or deformed space IS gravity.

No, it's gravitation.

No, it's gravity.

Quote from: afiq980 on October 28, 2007, 04:48:39 AM

The air resistances wouldnt matter if Earth is going upwards.

The earth is accelerating the air.  Therefore, air resistance.

You try placing a small balloon into a significantly bigger one, then, accelerate the bigger balloon upwards. What happens? The small balloon will hit the bottom of the bigger balloon.

The Earth is accelerating the air? haha.

You try placing a small balloon into a significantly bigger one, then, accelerate the bigger balloon upwards. What happens? The small balloon will hit the bottom of the bigger balloon.

The Earth is accelerating the air? haha.

I don't say this often, but you're a fucking moron.

The easiest example to make you understand is this:

Air is a fluid. Water, is also a fluid (granted much more dense). Now fill up a bath tub, place your hand in the water palm-up, and parallel to the bottom. Now, swiftly move your hand up towards the surface and notice what happens. This is equivalent to what the Earth does to the air.

So like he said, air resistance.

Quote from: afiq980 on October 29, 2007, 03:40:22 AM

You try placing a small balloon into a significantly bigger one, then, accelerate the bigger balloon upwards. What happens? The small balloon will hit the bottom of the bigger balloon.

The Earth is accelerating the air? haha.

I don't say this often, but you're a fucking moron.

The easiest example to make you understand is this:

Air is a fluid. Water, is also a fluid (granted much more dense). Now fill up a bath tub, place your hand in the water palm-up, and parallel to the bottom. Now, swiftly move your hand up towards the surface and notice what happens. This is equivalent to what the Earth does to the air.

So like he said, air resistance.

Nope. With air, its a little bit more different as the fluidity is more of that of water.

Imagine:

You are on a train. Then, the train accelerates, most of the time, more than 9.8m/s/s. Do you feel the air in the train RUSHING towards you and giving you air resistance? Duh, of course not.

Now, imagine that the train is Earth and that the acceleration of the train is UA. Does that make more sense now?