Debate: Tides

  • 45 Replies
  • 10455 Views
*

Wolvaccine

  • EXTRA SPICY MODE
  • 25833
  • +3/-2
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #30 on: January 04, 2018, 08:48:32 PM »
epic necro  8)

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

Know your place

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #31 on: January 04, 2018, 08:55:22 PM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.

?

MouseWalker

  • 934
  • +0/-0
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #32 on: January 04, 2018, 09:36:03 PM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.
I thought it better when starting a whole new thread.
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #33 on: January 04, 2018, 09:43:48 PM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.
I thought it better when starting a whole new thread.

Grow some balls and start a thread.

?

MouseWalker

  • 934
  • +0/-0
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #34 on: January 04, 2018, 10:01:53 PM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.
I thought it better when starting a whole new thread.

Grow some balls and start a thread.
Well let's just say that I did because I would have made the same statement. How about you giving the flat Earth cause of tides.
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #35 on: January 04, 2018, 11:27:20 PM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.
I thought it better when starting a whole new thread.

Grow some balls and start a thread.
Well let's just say that I did because I would have made the same statement.

So instead of being redundant you chose to be lazy.

?

MouseWalker

  • 934
  • +0/-0
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #36 on: January 04, 2018, 11:50:39 PM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.
I thought it better when starting a whole new thread.

Grow some balls and start a thread.
Well let's just say that I did because I would have made the same statement.

So instead of being redundant you chose to be lazy.
And you have nothing to contribute, but sarcasm.
Where is your understanding, of why we have tides.
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #37 on: January 04, 2018, 11:59:11 PM »

And you have nothing to contribute, but sarcasm.
Where is your understanding, of why we have tides.



This is about you digging, up old threads.
The question has been asked and answered many, times in the past ten, years.


?

MouseWalker

  • 934
  • +0/-0
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #38 on: January 05, 2018, 12:11:10 AM »

And you have nothing to contribute, but sarcasm.
Where is your understanding, of why we have tides.



This is about you digging, up old threads.
The question has been asked and answered many, times in the past ten, years.
In the thread that I woke, there was no answer, and I am asking YOU, what is your explanation, of the tides?
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #39 on: January 05, 2018, 12:15:51 AM »

And you have nothing to contribute, but sarcasm.
Where is your understanding, of why we have tides.



This is about you digging, up old threads.
The question has been asked and answered many, times in the past ten, years.
In the thread that I woke, there was no answer, and I am asking YOU, what is your explanation, of the tides?

And I am telling, you flat out . . . start a new thread with, something original.

(also learn to use comas).

?

MouseWalker

  • 934
  • +0/-0
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #40 on: January 05, 2018, 12:19:08 AM »

And you have nothing to contribute, but sarcasm.
Where is your understanding, of why we have tides.



This is about you digging, up old threads.
The question has been asked and answered many, times in the past ten, years.
In the thread that I woke, there was no answer, and I am asking YOU, what is your explanation, of the tides?

And I am telling, you flat out . . . start a new thread with, something original.

(also learn to use comas).
Well I can see this is going nowhere, it's late for me so good night.
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #41 on: January 05, 2018, 12:54:29 AM »
You are dismissed.

*

54N

  • 173
  • +0/-0
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #42 on: January 05, 2018, 06:25:25 AM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.
I thought it better when starting a whole new thread.
You did right.     Some hilarious FE answers  :o  I'd never have seen otherwise.         

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #43 on: January 05, 2018, 06:27:59 AM »
One needs to dig deep for a 10 year old thread.
I thought it better when starting a whole new thread.
You did right.     Some hilarious FE answers  :o  I'd never have seen otherwise.       

Do you have a mouse with a click button?

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • +0/-0
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #44 on: January 05, 2018, 03:03:25 PM »
There are two moons, one above the earth, and one underneath.  The gravity from these cause tides
Is that you got double vision again!
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • +0/-0
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: Debate: Tides
« Reply #45 on: January 05, 2018, 03:05:27 PM »
No, it exerts a positive one, but it never passes under the other moon.
Have you seen it with your telescope John?
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these