wait so site is joke right?

Wait.

I want TheEngineer to tell me what he REALLY believes.

I've been under the assumption all this time that he was a FE'er with above-average intelligence, although eccentric in his beliefs about the shape of the world.

If he does not believe this theory, then NONE of the FE believers have substantial intelligence to warrant argument.

I'm not trying to disprove FE here;  Intelligence of believers has nothing to do with accuracy of the belief.

But, for my own peace of mind, I would like to know if Engy specifically believes this.  Pretty much all of the other intelligent "FE'ers" have been determined to not be for FET at all.  I mean, TomB isn't exactly a brain surgeon.  Dogplatter never posts (and made that weird post about penguins...).  Daniel I have never seen actually post.  Username (who even knows if he believes it?) mostly regurgitates what other people say.

Substantial intelligence to warrant argument? LOL. Might be the other way around.

TheEngineer doesn't believe in a flat Earth. His posts merely clarify issues that people misunderstand or bring up incorrectly.
Tom keeps all the noobs who are too stupid to read busy.
Dogplatter doesn't have much time to post, but he answers stuff when he can. He is one of the few that truly profess a belief in the flat Earth.
Daniel, I have never seen post either.
Username proclaims a belief in a flat Earth, and doesn't really regurgitate much as you claim.

Username proclaims a belief in a flat Earth, and doesn't really regurgitate much as you claim.

Tell that to the vodka last night! Uuuugh.

my belief's will remain in the dark.

Ad hominem attack. Nice try, Hitler.

"Ad hominem attack" is redundant because "ad hominem" is an attack to the person.

Also, just who are you saying that to? Learn to quote posts.

Quote from: Althalus on November 13, 2007, 09:08:38 PM

Ad hominem attack. Nice try, Hitler.

"Ad hominem attack" is redundant because "ad hominem" is an attack to the person.

Also, just who are you saying that to? Learn to quote posts.

Isn't ad hominem "at the person"?  It doesn't look redundant to me at all.

Quote from: Althalus on November 13, 2007, 09:08:38 PM

Ad hominem attack. Nice try, Hitler.

"Ad hominem attack" is redundant because "ad hominem" is an attack to the person.

Also, just who are you saying that to? Learn to quote posts.

I was trying to replicate the OP's lack of incredulity.

Quote from: questions on November 13, 2007, 10:17:12 PM

Wait.

I want TheEngineer to tell me what he REALLY believes.

I've been under the assumption all this time that he was a FE'er with above-average intelligence, although eccentric in his beliefs about the shape of the world.

If he does not believe this theory, then NONE of the FE believers have substantial intelligence to warrant argument.

I'm not trying to disprove FE here;  Intelligence of believers has nothing to do with accuracy of the belief.

But, for my own peace of mind, I would like to know if Engy specifically believes this.  Pretty much all of the other intelligent "FE'ers" have been determined to not be for FET at all.  I mean, TomB isn't exactly a brain surgeon.  Dogplatter never posts (and made that weird post about penguins...).  Daniel I have never seen actually post.  Username (who even knows if he believes it?) mostly regurgitates what other people say.

Substantial intelligence to warrant argument? LOL. Might be the other way around.

TheEngineer doesn't believe in a flat Earth. His posts merely clarify issues that people misunderstand or bring up incorrectly.
Tom keeps all the noobs who are too stupid to read busy.
Dogplatter doesn't have much time to post, but he answers stuff when he can. He is one of the few that truly profess a belief in the flat Earth.
Daniel, I have never seen post either.
Username proclaims a belief in a flat Earth, and doesn't really regurgitate much as you claim.

Awwww.... 

But Engy's postulations are always so... so... plausible. 

Tom is annoying and trite, always changing opinions, always coming up with the most illogical explanations for an illogical theory...

Dogplatter seems intelligent enough, and has a lot of original-ish ideas.

Daniel is a ghost. 

And username... Ah username.  I'm not calling him stupid, what I'm trying to say is that the others on my list have ideas that are either their own or that they have expanded on. 

Those are the only five people on the site that I truly have believed are "for" a FE.  Well, besides the religious "wackos" who believe that Jerusalem is the center of the universe and all that... (No offense, but I can't understand how anyone would believe that...)

And username... Ah username.  I'm not calling him stupid, what I'm trying to say is that the others on my list have ideas that are either their own or that they have expanded on. 

Sun-Aetheric Refraction
Fractal Recursive Earth
Parabolic Infinite Earth
The Antimoon
Infinite Gaussian Flat Earth

YOU'RE the one that came up with the anti-moon?!

..


..


..


..


 

..

..

..

 

..

..

..


Okay, alright.  You can be in the brilliant people's club.   

Quote from: divito the fascist on November 14, 2007, 03:41:40 AM

Username proclaims a belief in a flat Earth, and doesn't really regurgitate much as you claim.

Tell that to the vodka last night! Uuuugh.

you suck

and whats this about antimoon? what have I missed?

oh you missed a treat, we invented a new moon last week.

oh you missed a treat, we invented a new moon last week.

discovered

It's on the opposite side of the earth and it explains tides.

I missed the antimoon?!?!?! damn. I miss everything. First the shadow object, now the antimoon.

I still have nightmares about the shadow object and cringe when noobs bring up phases of the moon. They seem to have dropped that one completely.

antimoon! WTF! how long have i been asleep!?!

WOW! A new moon! That is so awesome

Quote from: Agent Z on November 15, 2007, 06:49:28 AM

oh you missed a treat, we invented a new moon last week.

discovered

no, invented. Nobody discovered it.

Quote from: Username on November 15, 2007, 09:52:49 PM

Quote from: Agent Z on November 15, 2007, 06:49:28 AM

oh you missed a treat, we invented a new moon last week.

discovered

no, invented. Nobody discovered it.

Slander.

WTF.

Last week. I swear this idea's been bouncing around since before then. It's been in our flat earth 101 for SWEFES for quite a bit now.  If I'm not mistaken this antimoon is just another word for the "shadow object". This is what causes lunar eclipses in the daytime etc. It's just a better name.

Please correct me if thats wrong username. I don't have a huge amount of grounding in this field. I've turned most of my attention and consideration to the Photoelectric suspension theory.  This has now been reposted by Dogplatter in the Flat Earth Information Repositary for those who are interested.

*cough*fucking retard*cough*

The shadow object blocked out the moon. The shadow object is on the other side of the Earth.

obviously....

WTF.

Last week. I swear this idea's been bouncing around since before then. It's been in our flat earth 101 for SWEFES for quite a bit now.  If I'm not mistaken this antimoon is just another word for the "shadow object". This is what causes lunar eclipses in the daytime etc. It's just a better name.

No, the antimoon is below the earth.

Please correct me if thats wrong username. I don't have a huge amount of grounding in this field. I've turned most of my attention and consideration to the Photoelectric suspension theory.  This has now been reposted by Dogplatter in the Flat Earth Information Repositary for those who are interested.

lol.

I did say I didn't know much about it.

hence the "correct me if I'm wrong"

*cough* cant read *cough*

dipshit.

fair enough I'll give it a read but surely the universal accelerator would prevent the antimoon from being able to exist on the other side?

Who is this Raist prick anyway?

The photoelectric effect cannot hold up the stars. That theory is crap. The antimoon theory is much better. It is caught in the DEF and accelerates along with the Earth. Who are you?

Quote from: Rogherio on November 19, 2007, 01:18:11 PM

Please correct me if thats wrong username. I don't have a huge amount of grounding in this field. I've turned most of my attention and consideration to the Photoelectric suspension theory.  This has now been reposted by Dogplatter in the Flat Earth Information Repositary for those who are interested.

lol.

I did say I didn't know much about it.

hence the "correct me if I'm wrong"

*cough* cant read *cough*

dipshit.

fair enough I'll give it a read but surely the universal accelerator would prevent the antimoon from being able to exist on the other side?

Who is this Raist prick anyway?

Well not knowing much doesn't mean you couldn't use the search feature. Please trust the members that have been here forever to recognize a shadow object.

Raist, stop acting like a goddamn FE-lapdog prick.  The guy made a LITTLE mistake, and in that SAME post asked to be corrected if he were wrong.  Unlike you, we can't all be perfection made man.

 

Quote from: Rogherio on November 19, 2007, 01:18:11 PM

Please correct me if thats wrong username. I don't have a huge amount of grounding in this field. I've turned most of my attention and consideration to the Photoelectric suspension theory.  This has now been reposted by Dogplatter in the Flat Earth Information Repositary for those who are interested.

lol.

I did say I didn't know much about it.

hence the "correct me if I'm wrong"

*cough* cant read *cough*

dipshit.

fair enough I'll give it a read but surely the universal accelerator would prevent the antimoon from being able to exist on the other side?

Who is this Raist prick anyway?

There would have to be something to prevent the antimoon from slow falling towards the bottom side of the flat earth, you are right.  What this is, I am unsure of.

I am not completely versed in your theory, but could it not explain this as well?

Raist, stop acting like a goddamn FE-lapdog prick.  The guy made a LITTLE mistake, and in that SAME post asked to be corrected if he were wrong.  Unlike you, we can't all be perfection made man.

 

He was acting like a prick to Raist, to be fair.

WTF.

Last week. I swear this idea's been bouncing around since before then. It's been in our flat earth 101 for SWEFES for quite a bit now.  If I'm not mistaken this antimoon is just another word for the "shadow object". This is what causes lunar eclipses in the daytime etc. It's just a better name.

Please correct me if thats wrong username. I don't have a huge amount of grounding in this field. I've turned most of my attention and consideration to the Photoelectric suspension theory.  This has now been reposted by Dogplatter in the Flat Earth Information Repositary for those who are interested.

*cough*fucking retard*cough*

The shadow object blocked out the moon. The shadow object is on the other side of the Earth.

Quote from: Rogherio on November 19, 2007, 01:18:11 PM

Please correct me if thats wrong username. I don't have a huge amount of grounding in this field. I've turned most of my attention and consideration to the Photoelectric suspension theory.  This has now been reposted by Dogplatter in the Flat Earth Information Repositary for those who are interested.

lol.

I did say I didn't know much about it.

hence the "correct me if I'm wrong"

*cough* cant read *cough*

dipshit.

fair enough I'll give it a read but surely the universal accelerator would prevent the antimoon from being able to exist on the other side?

Who is this Raist prick anyway?

Quote from: Rogherio on November 21, 2007, 10:26:32 AM

Quote from: Rogherio on November 19, 2007, 01:18:11 PM

Please correct me if thats wrong username. I don't have a huge amount of grounding in this field. I've turned most of my attention and consideration to the Photoelectric suspension theory.  This has now been reposted by Dogplatter in the Flat Earth Information Repositary for those who are interested.

lol.

I did say I didn't know much about it.

hence the "correct me if I'm wrong"

*cough* cant read *cough*

dipshit.

fair enough I'll give it a read but surely the universal accelerator would prevent the antimoon from being able to exist on the other side?

Who is this Raist prick anyway?

Well not knowing much doesn't mean you couldn't use the search feature. Please trust the members that have been here forever to recognize a shadow object.

...Looks like Raist started it to me.   

oh well.

PEStheory still sucks.