Poll

Should engy unlock this thread?

Yes
No
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 28   Go Down

RE floating oceans.

  • 817 Replies
  • 179676 Views
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #600 on: November 02, 2007, 02:28:07 PM »
Logged
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #601 on: November 02, 2007, 03:51:54 PM »
The bottommost molecules are free to float, but as soon as it does, more take their place.

Therefore, the "bottommost" layer never moves.
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #602 on: November 02, 2007, 04:31:40 PM »
I know, Smarticu just keeps dragging it on and on.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #603 on: November 02, 2007, 04:33:13 PM »
Right, Smarticus, respond to the point I raised or
shut up
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #604 on: November 02, 2007, 04:48:19 PM »
WHY MUST THIS BE MORE THAN 30 PAGES LONG?!?!?!?
Logged
*

ALASKA

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #605 on: November 02, 2007, 05:04:43 PM »
Have to spam somewhere?lol
Logged
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #606 on: November 02, 2007, 05:50:16 PM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on November 02, 2007, 04:48:19 PM
WHY MUST THIS BE MORE THAN 30 PAGES LONG?!?!?!?

Because you continue to argue with narc, duh ::)
Logged
*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #607 on: November 02, 2007, 05:57:38 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 02, 2007, 12:52:31 PM
Fine, don't take the easy way out.  Keep arguing.

Somebody already brought up the point that it would have the same effect in both models. Narcberry ignored it. (big surprise)
Logged
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #608 on: November 02, 2007, 06:01:12 PM »
Quote from: L0gic on November 02, 2007, 05:57:38 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 02, 2007, 12:52:31 PM
Fine, don't take the easy way out.  Keep arguing.

Somebody already brought up the point that it would have the same effect in both models. Narcberry ignored it. (big surprise)

...so you ignore him.
Logged
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #609 on: November 02, 2007, 06:05:05 PM »
Actually, in FE a massless particle would have weight while in RE it would not.

OMG!  Light has weight!
Logged
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #610 on: November 02, 2007, 06:16:54 PM »
so do we declare victory or wait for narc?
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
?

SushiTsunami

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #611 on: November 02, 2007, 06:27:04 PM »
Man this is crazy. Regardless of which theory you subscribe to, the acceleration of the FE model CREATES THE SAME EFFECT AS GRAVITY as on the RE model...
hahaaahaah, Smarticus, hahahahaahhaha
Logged
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #612 on: November 02, 2007, 07:19:00 PM »
Smarticus is never gonna let it go. So neither will I. The fact that he is either:

a) so stupid that he can't understand the basic properties of water,
or
b) so stubborn that he won't accept defeat,

both inspire me to carry on arguing with him.
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-81
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #613 on: November 03, 2007, 12:52:24 AM »
c) he gets his kicks this way
Logged
If you can't argue botth sides, you understa neither
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #614 on: November 03, 2007, 02:51:44 AM »
d) He is part of the anticonspiracy.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #615 on: November 03, 2007, 07:14:20 AM »
e) he likes to screw with people
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #616 on: November 03, 2007, 08:15:35 AM »
f) Understands (unlike you) that as soon as you take him seriously enough to argue with him, he wins and gets to laugh at you.
Logged
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #617 on: November 03, 2007, 08:21:04 AM »
A: You're adorable.
B: You're so beautiful.
C: You're  cutie full of charms.
D: You're a darling.
E: You're exciting.
F: You're a feather in my arms.
G: You look good to me.
H: You're so heavenly.
I: You're the one I idolize.
J: We're like Jack and Jill.
K: You're so kissable.
L is the love light in your eyes.
M
N
O
P
I could go on all day.
Q
R
S
T
Alphabetically speaking, you're Okay.
U made my life complete.
V means you're very sweet
W
X
Y
Z
It's fun to wander through the alphabet with you,
To tell you what you mean to me!
Logged
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #618 on: November 03, 2007, 04:22:30 PM »
Ok I think it's time I edit my sig.
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
?

eric bloedow

Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #619 on: November 03, 2007, 07:43:24 PM »
bouyancy and weight are different things, and you are confusung them. read the description of any large ship, and you will find a reference to it's "displacement", the amount of water it would push aside. this is much larger than the ship's actual weight.

i once saw a science experiment: a gadget called a "drip tank" was hooked up. it was perfectly full of water, so if something was dropped into it, the same volume of water would "drip" into a nearby bucket.

the teacher then slowly dropped a large piece of clay shaped like a brick into the tank. it pushed out a quantity of water that weighed about as much as the clay.

then he took a second, identical piece of clay, molded it into a crude boat, and slowly dropped it into the tank. result: it pushed out 3 or 4 times as much water, and floated!
Logged
?

eric bloedow

Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #620 on: November 03, 2007, 07:49:33 PM »
sorry for the digresion there. still, let me make another observation: if he is right about water being weightless, anyone could scoop up a bucketfull of water, toss it in the air, and it would SHOOT OFF INTO OUTER SPACE.

he's too stupid/ignorant to understand the difference between water and water VAPOR. he would put water on a stove, turn the oven on, and have NO idea where the water went!

he also doesn't believe there are such things as rain or snow.
i wonder if he knows what ICE is...
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #621 on: November 04, 2007, 03:30:09 AM »
He still hasn't explained away the fact, according to his floating oceans theory, there is no rain on FE.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #622 on: November 04, 2007, 04:14:25 AM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on November 03, 2007, 08:21:04 AM
A: You're adorable.
B: You're so beautiful.
C: You're  cutie full of charms.
D: You're a darling.
E: You're exciting.
F: You're a feather in my arms.
G: You look good to me.
H: You're so heavenly.
I: You're the one I idolize.
J: We're like Jack and Jill.
K: You're so kissable.
L is the love light in your eyes.
M
N
O
P
I could go on all day.
Q
R
S
T
Alphabetically speaking, you're Okay.
U made my life complete.
V means you're very sweet
W
X
Y
Z
It's fun to wander through the alphabet with you,
To tell you what you mean to me!

Haha, God bless Patrick Stuart for that one! Is 'the picard song' on your ipod?
Logged
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-81
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #623 on: November 04, 2007, 10:20:03 AM »
Quote from: Darth Bishop on November 04, 2007, 03:30:09 AM
He still hasn't explained away the fact, according to his floating oceans theory, there is no rain on FE.
I thought he was just saying the RE theory made no sense, not that this was the official FE theory (which it obviously isn't)
Logged
If you can't argue botth sides, you understa neither
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #624 on: November 04, 2007, 11:48:47 AM »
Quote from: Mr. Ireland on November 03, 2007, 08:15:35 AM
f) Understands (unlike you) that as soon as you take him seriously enough to argue with him, he wins and gets to laugh at you.

i don't take anything on this site seriously. It's all just for kicks for me.

When I start buying flat earth literature, and digging out physics, mathematics, and engineering books to reference for this site, then I'll decide I'm taking it too seriously.
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #625 on: November 04, 2007, 02:13:19 PM »
Quote from: Username on November 04, 2007, 10:20:03 AM
Quote from: Darth Bishop on November 04, 2007, 03:30:09 AM
He still hasn't explained away the fact, according to his floating oceans theory, there is no rain on FE.
I thought he was just saying the RE theory made no sense, not that this was the official FE theory (which it obviously isn't)
Actually, he was making up a load of proposterous BS to get RE'ers all huffed up. and it worked.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #626 on: November 04, 2007, 07:51:11 PM »
Quote from: eric bloedow on November 03, 2007, 07:43:24 PM
bouyancy and weight are different things, and you are confusung them. read the description of any large ship, and you will find a reference to it's "displacement", the amount of water it would push aside. this is much larger than the ship's actual weight.

i once saw a science experiment: a gadget called a "drip tank" was hooked up. it was perfectly full of water, so if something was dropped into it, the same volume of water would "drip" into a nearby bucket.

the teacher then slowly dropped a large piece of clay shaped like a brick into the tank. it pushed out a quantity of water that weighed about as much as the clay.

then he took a second, identical piece of clay, molded it into a crude boat, and slowly dropped it into the tank. result: it pushed out 3 or 4 times as much water, and floated!
Quote from: eric bloedow on November 03, 2007, 07:49:33 PM
sorry for the digresion there. still, let me make another observation: if he is right about water being weightless, anyone could scoop up a bucketfull of water, toss it in the air, and it would SHOOT OFF INTO OUTER SPACE.

he's too stupid/ignorant to understand the difference between water and water VAPOR. he would put water on a stove, turn the oven on, and have NO idea where the water went!

he also doesn't believe there are such things as rain or snow.
i wonder if he knows what ICE is...



... As I've said a million times. You RE'ers get dumber with each page.
Logged
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #627 on: November 04, 2007, 09:18:50 PM »
You know very well that guy is a noob.
Logged
*

questions

  • 206
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #628 on: November 05, 2007, 03:39:39 AM »
I've been following this thread for... oh, about a week now.  And it's kind of funny.  While some of you are obviously enjoying yourselves in this big joke (Smarticus for one), some of your reactions indicate you're taking this SO seriously...! 

I mean, a good pseudo-debate is kind of interesting, especially when some people don't quite get that it's not real. 
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #629 on: November 05, 2007, 05:21:19 AM »
Exactemundo. It's quite fun to twist his idea round and bite him with it.

Remeber, no rain on FE according to Samrticus!
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 28   Go Up
« previous next »