This simply cannot be

  • 65 Replies
  • 12552 Views
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-81
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: This simply cannot be
« Reply #60 on: September 21, 2007, 11:58:08 AM »

Einstein maintained that gravity as a force did not exist. Are you saying that you're smarter than Einstein?

Einstein never maintianed this. He spent the last 30 years of his life trying to unify gravitation and electromagnetism. He understood it was a force.
Don't blame TomB on that error. He's following the bad explanations from TheEngineer.
You've said the same thing.  That gravity isn't a force but the bending of space time
Really where did I say that Bushy? Was it the same imaginary post where I had Newton's Second Law of Motion wrong?
I'm sorry, I thought you believed in General Relativity, in which gravity isn't a force. 

Had thought you said gravitons don't exist. 

To be honest, I can't be fucked to search through your posts so I'll believe you and say sorry.
If ynou can't argue both sides, you understand neither

?

Gulliver

  • 3804
  • +0/-0
Re: This simply cannot be
« Reply #61 on: September 21, 2007, 11:59:15 AM »

Einstein maintained that gravity as a force did not exist. Are you saying that you're smarter than Einstein?

Einstein never maintianed this. He spent the last 30 years of his life trying to unify gravitation and electromagnetism. He understood it was a force.
Don't blame TomB on that error. He's following the bad explanations from TheEngineer.
You've said the same thing.  That gravity isn't a force but the bending of space time
Really where did I say that Bushy? Was it the same imaginary post where I had Newton's Second Law of Motion wrong?
I'm sorry, I thought you believed in General Relativity, in which gravity isn't a force. 

Had thought you said gravitons don't exist. 

To be honest, I can't be fucked to search through your posts so I'll believe you and say sorry.
Apology accepted.

?

emailking

  • 329
  • +0/-0
Re: This simply cannot be
« Reply #62 on: September 21, 2007, 12:01:02 PM »
GR does not say that gravity isn't a force. Just because you have a fundamental udnerstanding of what causes a force doesn't mean it's not a force anymore.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-81
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: This simply cannot be
« Reply #63 on: September 21, 2007, 12:02:48 PM »
GR does not say that gravity isn't a force.
Yes, GR does.

Quote
Just because you have a fundamental udnerstanding of what causes a force doesn't mean it's not a force anymore.
I don't think I said it did
If ynou can't argue both sides, you understand neither

?

Gulliver

  • 3804
  • +0/-0
Re: This simply cannot be
« Reply #64 on: September 21, 2007, 12:03:31 PM »
GR does not say that gravity isn't a force. Just because you have a fundamental udnerstanding of what causes a force doesn't mean it's not a force anymore.
Well said. I'm glad you've joined us. Welcome.

?

emailking

  • 329
  • +0/-0
Re: This simply cannot be
« Reply #65 on: September 21, 2007, 12:07:55 PM »
"Yes, GR does."

No it doesn't GR provides an explanation for the fore of gravity. It gives a geometrical explanation based on minimizing the action. That doesn't mean gravity is not perceived as a force. F=ma for gravity as for any other force.

"I don't think I said it did"

But that's why you think that.

And thanks Gulliver.