If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?
Nature abhors infinities.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
We're all jealous of Raist.
As for the flat farth, the earth is flattened over time from the peoples that walk on it.
QuoteAlright, so he didn't see the end. That makes it infinite? You're the one who's always so quick to bring up vanishing points.How else would the atmosphere be contained on a Flat Earth?Undiscovered 100 mile tall Ice Wall?Celestial Dome?It's much likelier that the earth is simply a bottom sedimentary layer of the coin shaped universe, where our local area is simply a fraction of the known world, with endless undiscovered fridged lands to the south which lay in perpetual darkness. The Flat Earth Society has always held that the earth was likely perpetual in nature, extending farther than any distance attainable by man, where temperatures in the pitch black tundra approach zero kelvin. Whomever made the FAQ did not represent the official stance of the Flat Earth Society. See ENaG, Flat Earth News, and the other Flat Earth Literature for more information about the perpetual plane of the earth.
Alright, so he didn't see the end. That makes it infinite? You're the one who's always so quick to bring up vanishing points.
Up, down, up, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, Start.I have cured cancer.
and in this reality, nothing comes for free in unlimited supplies.
Quoteand in this reality, nothing comes for free in unlimited supplies.Proof?
Also, Chris is hot.
TomB, we've pointed out that an infinite Earth faces three challenges.1) The atmosphere varies over time. An infinite solution cannot.2) An infinite Earth would conduct away the heat of the central area so quickly and completely as to leave the central portion frigid.3) Nature abhors infinities.
Quote from: Gulliver on September 09, 2007, 08:54:06 AMTomB, we've pointed out that an infinite Earth faces three challenges.1) The atmosphere varies over time. An infinite solution cannot.2) An infinite Earth would conduct away the heat of the central area so quickly and completely as to leave the central portion frigid.3) Nature abhors infinities.1) Yes, an infinite solution could. 2) The central area? Regardless, that is also not necessarily true3) Anthropomorphizing nature doesn't help you at all, and you are wrong
Quote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?I applaud your sound reasoning, but you are dealing with cinder blocks in here.
ok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?
Quote from: Intellectually Abandoned Thread on September 07, 2007, 07:11:15 PMQuote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?I applaud your sound reasoning, but you are dealing with cinder blocks in here.That made me lol.I hope you understand the concept of surface tension. The earth was not made by God splashing in his tub, nor is it 100% H2O.
ok, have you ever seen people drinking in zero gravity. the water forms spheres. it does this because it tries to form the shape with the smallest surface area.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 12:11:23 PMQuote from: Dead Kangaroo on September 08, 2007, 06:58:03 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 02:51:19 AMQuote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?Have you noticed that rain drops are shaped like flat hamburger buns?No, that's just your head, Tom. http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232/2http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/almanac/arc2000/alm00jul.htmhttp://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/history/lenard.htmErgo, we see that the most natural shape is not a sphere but a flattened surface.Faulty reasoning, as expected from TomB!The air resistance is changing the most natural shape, a sphere.Ergo, TomB is a fool.
Quote from: Dead Kangaroo on September 08, 2007, 06:58:03 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 02:51:19 AMQuote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?Have you noticed that rain drops are shaped like flat hamburger buns?No, that's just your head, Tom. http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232/2http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/almanac/arc2000/alm00jul.htmhttp://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/history/lenard.htmErgo, we see that the most natural shape is not a sphere but a flattened surface.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 02:51:19 AMQuote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?Have you noticed that rain drops are shaped like flat hamburger buns?No, that's just your head, Tom.
Quote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?Have you noticed that rain drops are shaped like flat hamburger buns?
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.
Quote from: Gulliver on September 08, 2007, 12:24:18 PMQuote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 12:11:23 PMQuote from: Dead Kangaroo on September 08, 2007, 06:58:03 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 02:51:19 AMQuote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?Have you noticed that rain drops are shaped like flat hamburger buns?No, that's just your head, Tom.You're quite right. Of course, as soon as you start with imaginary forces, like the UA, anything is possible. http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232/2http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/almanac/arc2000/alm00jul.htmhttp://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/history/lenard.htmErgo, we see that the most natural shape is not a sphere but a flattened surface.Faulty reasoning, as expected from TomB!The air resistance is changing the most natural shape, a sphere.Ergo, TomB is a fool.change the water to the Earth and change air resistance to Universal Accelerator and you see how FE was formed. Easy.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 12:11:23 PMQuote from: Dead Kangaroo on September 08, 2007, 06:58:03 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 02:51:19 AMQuote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?Have you noticed that rain drops are shaped like flat hamburger buns?No, that's just your head, Tom.You're quite right. Of course, as soon as you start with imaginary forces, like the UA, anything is possible. http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232/2http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/almanac/arc2000/alm00jul.htmhttp://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/history/lenard.htmErgo, we see that the most natural shape is not a sphere but a flattened surface.Faulty reasoning, as expected from TomB!The air resistance is changing the most natural shape, a sphere.Ergo, TomB is a fool.
Quote from: Dead Kangaroo on September 08, 2007, 06:58:03 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on September 08, 2007, 02:51:19 AMQuote from: ash bash on September 07, 2007, 12:45:18 AMok, have you noticed that when you splash water, it always seems to form spheres?Have you noticed that rain drops are shaped like flat hamburger buns?No, that's just your head, Tom.You're quite right. Of course, as soon as you start with imaginary forces, like the UA, anything is possible. http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_sky/91232/2http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/almanac/arc2000/alm00jul.htmhttp://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/history/lenard.htmErgo, we see that the most natural shape is not a sphere but a flattened surface.
ok. i am not saying that the droplets have thier own gravity. i am saying that in zero g there is no gravity to affect the shape of the drop. also, when you say that my theory is wrong because the earth was not made by god splashing around in his tub and it is not all water. well, before the earth was solid, it was liquid, and before that it was dust thatw as pulled into a sphere by its own gravity
Quote from: ash bash on September 17, 2007, 11:57:13 AMok. i am not saying that the droplets have thier own gravity. i am saying that in zero g there is no gravity to affect the shape of the drop. also, when you say that my theory is wrong because the earth was not made by god splashing around in his tub and it is not all water. well, before the earth was solid, it was liquid, and before that it was dust thatw as pulled into a sphere by its own gravityLet's just ignore the fact that surface tension has been said over 4 times now and consider this:What would dirt do in the vacuum of space? Form a dirt droplet?
Quote from: Narcberry on September 17, 2007, 11:59:59 AMQuote from: ash bash on September 17, 2007, 11:57:13 AMok. i am not saying that the droplets have thier own gravity. i am saying that in zero g there is no gravity to affect the shape of the drop. also, when you say that my theory is wrong because the earth was not made by god splashing around in his tub and it is not all water. well, before the earth was solid, it was liquid, and before that it was dust thatw as pulled into a sphere by its own gravityLet's just ignore the fact that surface tension has been said over 4 times now and consider this:What would dirt do in the vacuum of space? Form a dirt droplet?You miss the point.Regardless of the congealing force, whether surface tension over a short time or gravity over a long time, the shape that matter will congeal into, assuming no other forces acting, is a sphere.