I didn't see any photos, videos, or non-ancient scientifically documented evidence.
Firstly, we have plenty of photographic evidence. Samuel Shenton once published a nice long beach shot with a telescopic camera lens, showing an image which could not be possible on a Round Earth. Likewise, on a recent thread on this very forum I have displayed a landscape of the the Toronto Skyline and calculations showing that the scene in the image is physically impossible on a Globe Earth.
Secondly, if you truly believe that truth has an expiration date, then you must logically also disregard Darwin's theory of Natural Selection (1840 A.D), Calculus (1400 A.D), Trigonometry (140 A.D), the theory of Buoyancy (280 B.C.), and so on.
Thus we wee that your ignorant view destroys most of modern science. That the concentrated prejudice you demonstrate in your post is pathetic to the extreme. There have been modern reproductions of Rowbotham's work. Dr. Leo Ferrari, Samuel Shenton, and Charles K. Johnson are all modern FES presidents who have published evidence proving beyond doubt that the Globe Earth theory is inaccurate in its predictions.
Since you are unable to accept clear evidence contradicting your world view we see that you fall in line with the other REers, that your opinion invalid, that you have chosen to plug your ears to the truth and follow media hype like a dog to the whistle.
I don't think you can compare random people's experiments to
Darwin, no matter how eloquently you put it. There have been many ancient experiments which fail under modern scrutiny. The experiments linked also hardly seemed scientific, and/or were conducted on much too small a scale.
I don't see any photos.. but you speak of 2. I find it unlikely that flat earthers believe the Earth is flat
based on 2 photos posted on this forum.. and a simple google image search finds
dozens of random people's photos showing a curve.. In the very least.. if you're going to
automatically discount the countless thousands of photos from NASA and high-altitude aircraft without even looking for signs of tampering.. why assume these 2 random photos posted on a forum are real? (considering they're the only real evidence I've even heard of)
PS: What part of EXTRAORDINARY evidence don't guys get. The idea that the earth is flat, accelerating upwards, being orbited by tiny flat discs... etc, etc, etc.. it goes on.. is quite EXTRAORDINARY, whether you think so or not. Ancient (claimed) tests + 2 photos does NOT = extraordinary.
And my failing to believe 2 photos (well.. a story about 2 photos) and some ancient tests (well.. someone who claimed to have performed some ancient tests) is NOT the same as "plugging my ears from the truth".
(Considering how incredibly, unbelievably rediculous "the truth" is.. I think I'm surprisingly "open" to it)