« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

NASA Infiltration

  • 44 Replies
  • 7932 Views
*

CommonCents

  • 1779
  • +0/-0
  • ^_^
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #30 on: July 27, 2007, 09:40:54 AM »
Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 27, 2007, 09:38:22 AM
I don't know what that imaginary proof would be... But if it's PROOF, you can't do anthing than accept it, can you?

Depends on what the 'proof' is.  Pictures are easily faked, for instance.
Logged
OMG!
*

Supreme Chicken

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #31 on: July 27, 2007, 10:20:23 AM »
If the NASA is hiding proof the world is flat, that proof won't be faked... otherwise, there's nothing left to hide, is it?
Logged
*

CommonCents

  • 1779
  • +0/-0
  • ^_^
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #32 on: July 27, 2007, 10:23:40 AM »
Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 27, 2007, 10:20:23 AM
If the NASA is hiding proof the world is flat, that proof won't be faked... otherwise, there's nothing left to hide, is it?
It doesn't matter if the 'proof' is really faked.  All that matters is that it could be faked.  That's all you need to have the media disprove the conspiracy.
Logged
OMG!
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #33 on: July 27, 2007, 10:29:06 AM »
Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 27, 2007, 10:20:23 AM
If the NASA is hiding proof the world is flat, that proof won't be faked... otherwise, there's nothing left to hide, is it?

And why would the conspiracy keep evidence of a lie? Then again, even if they did, do you think they'd let be easily accessible to random new employees trying to expose the truth or any such attempt at breaking it out?

The media will have the backing of all the space agencies who would have fabricated years of proof, and also created their evidence and discoveries within the realm of actual science. Anyone one person claiming a conspiracy wouldn't get far in the media or in the general public. That's what people get for the negative connotation they put on conspirators. Really rather sad.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #34 on: July 27, 2007, 10:44:19 AM »
I don't think it's been argued that it's impossible that information about the conspiracy could be leaked, just that it hasn't.  You fail on logical terms.  And at any rate, such information would be viewed with suspicion and probably not be taken seriously anyway.  Photographs can be falsified, documents can be falsified, opinions can be falsified.  Such a conspiracy would be airtight simply by virtue of the fact that it's so roundly assumed that the earth is a sphere.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #35 on: July 27, 2007, 02:12:50 PM »
People think there is not ample power to control something like the conspiracy. But just look at vietnam. All the secrets we still don't have and it was done by the public!

We never belonged in vietnam.
Logged
*

Supreme Chicken

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #36 on: July 28, 2007, 02:24:43 AM »
Okay, photos, documents, opinions, everything could be faked. BUT! If the proof really is proof, and you can test it, do some experiments yourself, those results can't be faked...
Logged
?

loveisround

  • 14
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #37 on: July 28, 2007, 04:20:05 AM »
Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 27, 2007, 07:39:01 AM
But you have people with high ranks... People with access to the 'proof'... If they just play their part well, nobody's going to find out what they're up to untill it's too late.

"until its too late"???

You belong in a soap opera!
Logged
?

loveisround

  • 14
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #38 on: July 28, 2007, 04:38:05 AM »
We seem to be going around in circles here.

In relation to this "conspiracy"  -  Isn't it obvious - how do we even have a "theory" for a flat earth? Doesn't the existence of a theory (even if it is somewhat LUDACRIS) prove that there is some leakage of information at NASA? And wouldn't that provoke more thought about flat earth among other workers?

Oh and a quick question, how did people cover up flat earth before NASA and was it just chance that the founders of NASA were evil or were they corrupted by their evil cats that can really talk and dance?
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #39 on: July 28, 2007, 04:42:28 AM »
Quote from: loveisround on July 28, 2007, 04:38:05 AM
In relation to this "conspiracy"  -  Isn't it obvious - how do we even have a "theory" for a flat earth? Doesn't the existence of a theory (even if it is somewhat LUDACRIS) prove that there is some leakage of information at NASA? And wouldn't that provoke more thought about flat earth among other workers?

Knowledge of the conspiracy, and even involvement with NASA is not necessary to develop a theory regarding the shape of the Earth.

Consider for a moment that the Earth really is a sphere. Are you trying to say that NASA leaked the idea of a flat Earth so that this website would be created?

Quote from: loveisround on July 28, 2007, 04:38:05 AM
Oh and a quick question, how did people cover up flat earth before NASA and was it just chance that the founders of NASA were evil or were they corrupted by their evil cats that can really talk and dance?

They didn't cover it up. It was all speculation and estimates based on observations and experiments. The space agencies that "went into space" would therefore be the first to have actual proof. The idea to profit from it, would subsequently come after that.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
*

Supreme Chicken

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #40 on: July 28, 2007, 06:00:48 AM »
Quote from: divito on July 28, 2007, 04:42:28 AM
Consider for a moment that the Earth really is a sphere. Are you trying to say that NASA leaked the idea of a flat Earth so that this website would be created?

Considered Earth is a sphere, NASA didn't leak any idea ;)

The idea of a flat Earth was proven to be wrong long before NASA was founded. Why would, for example, Eratosthene make up a story of a round Earth? What would he profit from it?
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #41 on: July 28, 2007, 11:04:24 AM »
Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 28, 2007, 06:00:48 AM
Considered Earth is a sphere, NASA didn't leak any idea ;)

I was just going off of loveisround's logic.

Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 28, 2007, 06:00:48 AM
The idea of a flat Earth was proven to be wrong long before NASA was founded. Why would, for example, Eratosthene make up a story of a round Earth? What would he profit from it?

He didn't make up a story and didn't try to profit anything. He just speculated and inferred off the evidence and observations he made from his experiments.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #42 on: July 28, 2007, 01:33:37 PM »
Which is tantamount to bullshitting.
Logged
Quote from: Raist on September 06, 2010, 07:48:56 PM
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.
?

yourmateste

Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #43 on: August 03, 2007, 08:30:15 PM »
No-one seems to notice China and Russia in space yet? Or do you FE's want to talk NASA all year and not focus on other people in space. I can see spacestations and satalittes from my telescope right here!!! I'm a photographer and yes images can be doctored but not shaped pre-1986 on computers. < (even if you prove me slightly off on that year) Look back to when the images from Russia were Sperical in the 60's and 70's. It was epic for a lot of people. I love conspiricys and such, but this one really is odd.
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: NASA Infiltration
« Reply #44 on: August 03, 2007, 08:47:28 PM »
Quote from: yourmateste on August 03, 2007, 08:30:15 PM
No-one seems to notice China and Russia in space yet? Or do you FE's want to talk NASA all year and not focus on other people in space. I can see spacestations and satalittes from my telescope right here!!! I'm a photographer and yes images can be doctored but not shaped pre-1986 on computers. < (even if you prove me slightly off on that year) Look back to when the images from Russia were Sperical in the 60's and 70's. It was epic for a lot of people. I love conspiricys and such, but this one really is odd.

When NASA is used, it essentially means all major space agencies. NASA is one of the main sources of new information regarding the information used in RE.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »