NASA Infiltration

Okay, so you believe NASA hides proof the world's flat. Then tell me: why is it that nobody from within NASA tells us the 'real' story? There are many, many people working there, why isn't anybody able to infiltrate NASA to collect the proof and make it public? NASA exists since 1958, there have been thousands of people working there, you cannot tell me nobody has ever been able to collect (the non-existing, by the way) proof. 

The FE'ers believe that anyone in the government that trys to spill the beans will be tasered (sp) before they can say it by a magic vocal thingy.

But you have people with high ranks... People with access to the 'proof'... If they just play their part well, nobody's going to find out what they're up to untill it's too late.

If the handful of people who have the proof are being played extremely well, why would they want to end it?  Easy money is easy money.

The proof is out, Nasa has shown that the shape of the earth is round. Now once someone like Tom Bishop comes here he'll say that NASA photos are faked.

If the handful of people who have the proof are being played extremely well, why would they want to end it?  Easy money is easy money.

Some people don't care about money (yes, those people exist ), and some people, which will most certainly include some FE'ers, will always want the truth to come out...

@ flat_earth: saying photos are faked doesn't mean they ARE faked... I can just as easily say trees are actually made of strawberrys, that doesn't make it true

Some people don't care about money (yes, those people exist ), and some people, which will most certainly include some FE'ers, will always want the truth to come out...

Obviously NASA isn't going to let people like that know

Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 27, 2007, 07:44:32 AM

Some people don't care about money (yes, those people exist ), and some people, which will most certainly include some FE'ers, will always want the truth to come out...

Obviously NASA isn't going to let people like that know

that's obvious... but one can pretend he's not a FE'er... one can pretend he believes in a round earth...

If you don't inform anybody about your real views, how could NASA know what you're up to?

I'm not saying that the pictures are fake, I'm say someone like Tom Bishop (an FE'er with the exact same picture that I'm using, pixle for pixle) will say that all picture that help the conspiracy are faked.

I'm not saying that the pictures are fake, I'm say someone like Tom Bishop (an FE'er with the exact same picture that I'm using, pixle for pixle) will say that all picture that help the conspiracy are faked.

but that's exactly the same... whether somebody is you or Tom Bishop, saying something is fake doesn't mean it really IS. Where's the proof? WHY are you saying those pictures are fake?

The FE'ers believe that the pictures were photoshoped. I, however, believe that the picture were real. Oh I may also clear this up as well, I'm an RE'er.

The handful of TRUSTED people actually would be FE'ers, since they'd know the truth (Earth is flat).  Not everybody working for NASA has to be in the conspiracy, we've already been over that in previous threads.  The handful of conspirators are just at the top of the chain and they tell their underlings what to do.  The conspirators don't just go around recruiting random people to know the secret.  I'd think that after how long they've been running things they know how to keep the secret safe.

The handful of TRUSTED people actually would be FE'ers, since they'd know the truth (Earth is flat).  Not everybody working for NASA has to be in the conspiracy, we've already been over that in previous threads.  The handful of conspirators are just at the top of the chain and they tell their underlings what to do.  The conspirators don't just go around recruiting random people to know the secret.  I'd think that after how long they've been running things they know how to keep the secret safe.

I understand what you're saying, but you can't completely hide such an enormous secret. The information is circling all over the internet, for example. Why can't a NASA employee become one of those high ranked persons? Somebody has to take such a post... If NASA believes someone is thrustworthy, because he plays his part well, why couldn't it be able for that person to bring out the proof?

If someone is accepted into the conspiracy, he's going to be a greedy person.  The love of money, alone, would be enough to keep him quiet.  The conspirators wouldn't trust anyone who isn't greedy like them.

If greed isn't enough to keep them quiet, the fear of death would be.  The conspirators would quickly kill the person who leaked information, and they all know this.

Ok say this: someone accepted the money but leaked out the info in clues?

Ok say this: someone accepted the money but leaked out the info in clues?

Bullet to the head solves that problem.

Ok say this: someone accepted the money but leaked out the info in clues?

Like the Da Vinci Code?  Or what if that person would bring out the proof anonymous? If there is no evidence against him or her, it could be anyone from the elite group, NASA wouldn't know who betrayed them...

If the conspirators are all greedy, and they only let other greedy people in, why would any one of them leak 'clues' that could be put together to break the whole conspiracy and lose all their money?

Also, the bullet to the head would work in such a case.

Sure lets go with the Da Vinci Code. Also I think its a bit hard trying to get something out anonymously with a secret that big, that is if it were true.

If the conspirators are all greedy, and they only let other greedy people in, why would any one of them leak 'clues' that could be put together to break the whole conspiracy and lose all their money?

Also, the bullet to the head would work in such a case.

or people who pretend to be greedy... but a bullet doesn't erase the clues 

Quote from: CommonCents on July 27, 2007, 08:20:15 AM

If the conspirators are all greedy, and they only let other greedy people in, why would any one of them leak 'clues' that could be put together to break the whole conspiracy and lose all their money?

Also, the bullet to the head would work in such a case.

or people who pretend to be greedy... but a bullet doesn't erase the clues 

My point exactly. They could trace the clues but it wouldn't help if it was already out. They couldn't off so many people without SOMETHING happening

Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 27, 2007, 08:23:46 AM

Quote from: CommonCents on July 27, 2007, 08:20:15 AM

If the conspirators are all greedy, and they only let other greedy people in, why would any one of them leak 'clues' that could be put together to break the whole conspiracy and lose all their money?

Also, the bullet to the head would work in such a case.

or people who pretend to be greedy... but a bullet doesn't erase the clues 

My point exactly. They could trace the clues but it wouldn't help if it was already out. They couldn't off so many people without SOMETHING happening

So, if that is unstoppable by NASA, why isn't there a brave FE'er, wanting the truth to come out, infiltrating NASA?

Pretend to be greedy? LOL

I'm sorry, but I cannot see someone risking their life to expose something that they have no proof of, that grants them no benefits besides public ridicule in the media. It's just utter stupidity.

You know how the media would spin that, discussing a loon claiming a conspiracy of the space agencies. Everyone has been brought up to laugh and shrug off conspiracy theories. Why you think there would magically be a way to foil them is strange.

Pretend to be greedy? LOL

I'm sorry, but I cannot see someone risking their life to expose something that they have no proof of, that grants them no benefits besides public ridicule in the media. It's just utter stupidity.

You know how the media would spin that, discussing a loon claiming a conspiracy of the space agencies. Everyone has been brought up to laugh and shrug off conspiracy theories. Why you think there would magically be a way to foil them is strange.

well, what they would expose IS the proof. Whatever the media WOULD say, if they have proof the world's flat, they can't keep denying it

Quote from: divito on July 27, 2007, 08:31:53 AM

Pretend to be greedy? LOL

I'm sorry, but I cannot see someone risking their life to expose something that they have no proof of, that grants them no benefits besides public ridicule in the media. It's just utter stupidity.

You know how the media would spin that, discussing a loon claiming a conspiracy of the space agencies. Everyone has been brought up to laugh and shrug off conspiracy theories. Why you think there would magically be a way to foil them is strange.

well, what they would expose IS the proof. Whatever the media WOULD say, if they have proof the world's flat, they can't keep denying it

Amen!

Quote from: divito on July 27, 2007, 08:31:53 AM

Pretend to be greedy? LOL

I'm sorry, but I cannot see someone risking their life to expose something that they have no proof of, that grants them no benefits besides public ridicule in the media. It's just utter stupidity.

You know how the media would spin that, discussing a loon claiming a conspiracy of the space agencies. Everyone has been brought up to laugh and shrug off conspiracy theories. Why you think there would magically be a way to foil them is strange.

well, what they would expose IS the proof. Whatever the media WOULD say, if they have proof the world's flat, they can't keep denying it

I thought the only thing they could get out were 'clues' which wouldn't be enough to tell everybody.  These 'clues' would just spark things such as this website.

Quote from: Supreme Chicken on July 27, 2007, 08:44:24 AM

Quote from: divito on July 27, 2007, 08:31:53 AM

Pretend to be greedy? LOL

I'm sorry, but I cannot see someone risking their life to expose something that they have no proof of, that grants them no benefits besides public ridicule in the media. It's just utter stupidity.

You know how the media would spin that, discussing a loon claiming a conspiracy of the space agencies. Everyone has been brought up to laugh and shrug off conspiracy theories. Why you think there would magically be a way to foil them is strange.

well, what they would expose IS the proof. Whatever the media WOULD say, if they have proof the world's flat, they can't keep denying it

I thought the only thing they could get out were 'clues' which wouldn't be enough to tell everybody.  These 'clues' would just spark things such as this website.

I am not talking about clues, I mean to bring out the whole proof... If it is proof, nobody can keep denying the world's flat, so why would people be laughing at that person?

What exactly is the 'proof' that he's leaking?

What exactly is the 'proof' that he's leaking?

I'd also like to know how this proof will stack up against the public scrutiny it'll face and how it'll counter the many, many years of evidence available.

If sokural was here, he'd call it magic proof.

I don't know what that imaginary proof would be... But if it's PROOF, you can't do anthing than accept it, can you?