Quote from: UsernameQuote from: Wakka WakkaThe bible is not a historical book in the least. It was written by man. So who does write history books? lol...and from one who is confessedly not particularly religious.
Quote from: Wakka WakkaThe bible is not a historical book in the least. It was written by man. So who does write history books?
The bible is not a historical book in the least. It was written by man.
Quote from: Wakka WakkaThe bible is not a historical book in the least. It was written by man.The Bible is historically accurate as it was written by men recording those who spake as they were moved to do so by the unerring Holy Spirit of God.Quote from: Wakka WakkaNot to mention the fact that your a disgusting racist who thinks the jews are out to get you. What could the jews possible do that constitutes a conspiracy?For starters, how about the american war on Iraq which was instigated by the fascist neo-conservatives. The leading intellectual journal of the neo-conservative movement is the Rupert Murdoch's Weekly Standard. Rupert Murdoch documentably has jewish parents, and he also owns the arrogantly racist anti-Palestinian Jerusalem Post. The Weekly Standard's Editor -in-Chief is William Kristol, a wealthy jewish journalist whose was the ideological centrepeice of the media network's pro-war campaign. The jew William Kristol did not get this position by virtue. His dad was Irving Kristol, a "former" Trotskyite Marxist and CIA funded journalist who founded the neoconservative movement back in the 1960's. Actually a lot of leading neoconservatives are jews who used to be leftists such as Norman Podhoetz , the racist jewish bastard who advocated dropping "nuclear" weapons on Iran. The jews took over the republican party and displaced the old right in the process. Thirty years ago most jews voted democrat. Ronald Reagan was the first republican most jews had voted for. After the israelis took Jerusalem in 1967, american jews began migrating to the republican party. At any rate, whether it is through a left-wing movement as in the overthrow of Christian Russia in 1917 or through a conservative government as is the case with the modern american invasion of Iraq, jewish leaders (both political and religious) have successfully conspired in using american government (and others) to assist them in furthering their political goals.My mention of the Kristols and Rupert Murdoch only hints at jewish control of the media ( and I didn't even mention jewish media moguls like Newhouse and the ). I could also go into jewish domination of the Department of Defense, such as Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith and his mentor Paul Wolfowitz who masterminded the invasion of Iraq. These and other jews in the US Defense Department who have greater loyalty to the terrorist state of israel constitute a network founded in the 1970's by jewish-american lobbyist Richard Perle - the mentor of Paul Wolfowitz and Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT).Quote from: Wakka WakkaAlso, testiments by saints also do not count becaues these are the same people who claimed to heal the blind and mamed.The Saints did heal the blind and mamed. Those parts of the lives of the Orthodox Christian Saints are true as indeed the entirety of their lives are historically accurate. Have a problem believing in miracles? Keep the faith.
Not to mention the fact that your a disgusting racist who thinks the jews are out to get you. What could the jews possible do that constitutes a conspiracy?
Also, testiments by saints also do not count becaues these are the same people who claimed to heal the blind and mamed.
Read the FAQ and lurk more.
Normally when I'm not sure I just cop a feel.
I attacked the bible because it is full of contradictory statements and blatant lies.
History isn't funny, people died.
The Bible contains no lies but only because it is a work of fiction so it contains lies in the same way that Lord Of The Rings contains lies.
Main Entry:fic·tion Pronunciation:\ˈfik-shən\ Function:noun Etymology:Middle English ficcioun, from Middle French fiction, from Latin fiction-, fictio act of fashioning, fiction, from fingere to shape, fashion, feign — more at doughDate:14th century1 a: something invented by the imagination or feigned; specifically : an invented story b: fictitious literature (as novels or short stories) c: a work of fiction; especially : novel2 a: an assumption of a possibility as a fact irrespective of the question of its truth <a legal fiction> b: a useful illusion or pretense3: the action of feigning or of creating with the imagination
Quote from: Kasroa Is Gone on June 09, 2008, 07:14:20 AMThe Bible contains no lies but only because it is a work of fiction so it contains lies in the same way that Lord Of The Rings contains lies.Quote from: Merriam-WebsterMain Entry:fic·tion Pronunciation:\ˈfik-shən\ Function:noun Etymology:Middle English ficcioun, from Middle French fiction, from Latin fiction-, fictio act of fashioning, fiction, from fingere to shape, fashion, feign — more at doughDate:14th century1 a: something invented by the imagination or feigned; specifically : an invented story b: fictitious literature (as novels or short stories) c: a work of fiction; especially : novel2 a: an assumption of a possibility as a fact irrespective of the question of its truth <a legal fiction> b: a useful illusion or pretense3: the action of feigning or of creating with the imaginationHmm, nope try again.
Quote from: Althalus on June 09, 2008, 07:21:46 AMQuote from: Kasroa Is Gone on June 09, 2008, 07:14:20 AMThe Bible contains no lies but only because it is a work of fiction so it contains lies in the same way that Lord Of The Rings contains lies.Quote from: Merriam-WebsterMain Entry:fic·tion Pronunciation:\ˈfik-shən\ Function:noun Etymology:Middle English ficcioun, from Middle French fiction, from Latin fiction-, fictio act of fashioning, fiction, from fingere to shape, fashion, feign — more at doughDate:14th century1 a: something invented by the imagination or feigned; specifically : an invented story b: fictitious literature (as novels or short stories) c: a work of fiction; especially : novel2 a: an assumption of a possibility as a fact irrespective of the question of its truth <a legal fiction> b: a useful illusion or pretense3: the action of feigning or of creating with the imaginationHmm, nope try again.What exactly was defining "fiction" supposed to achieve?
Quote from: Kasroa Is Gone on June 09, 2008, 07:23:11 AMQuote from: Althalus on June 09, 2008, 07:21:46 AMQuote from: Kasroa Is Gone on June 09, 2008, 07:14:20 AMThe Bible contains no lies but only because it is a work of fiction so it contains lies in the same way that Lord Of The Rings contains lies.Quote from: Merriam-WebsterMain Entry:fic·tion Pronunciation:\ˈfik-shən\ Function:noun Etymology:Middle English ficcioun, from Middle French fiction, from Latin fiction-, fictio act of fashioning, fiction, from fingere to shape, fashion, feign — more at doughDate:14th century1 a: something invented by the imagination or feigned; specifically : an invented story b: fictitious literature (as novels or short stories) c: a work of fiction; especially : novel2 a: an assumption of a possibility as a fact irrespective of the question of its truth <a legal fiction> b: a useful illusion or pretense3: the action of feigning or of creating with the imaginationHmm, nope try again.What exactly was defining "fiction" supposed to achieve? Of the definitons for fiction, the Bible is none of them.
The existence of the phoenix is also affirmed by the well known ancient pagan writers such as Herodotus and Pliny among others.
Indeed, but such symbolism is deliberately designed to appear ridiculous in its externals in order that only the true lovers of God will persevere in penetrating to the inner meaning of much of what is in the Bible.
Quote from: 17 November on July 27, 2007, 06:39:48 PMThe existence of the phoenix is also affirmed by the well known ancient pagan writers such as Herodotus and Pliny among others.Not to mention Chris Claremont and John Byrne
It's no slur if it's fact.
Quote from: Kable24 on August 15, 2008, 10:54:28 AMQuote from: 17 November on July 27, 2007, 06:39:48 PMThe existence of the phoenix is also affirmed by the well known ancient pagan writers such as Herodotus and Pliny among others.Not to mention Chris Claremont and John ByrneFor the sake of the Jews, you should not bump a 17 November thread.
Quote from: sokarul on August 15, 2008, 02:41:03 PMQuote from: Kable24 on August 15, 2008, 10:54:28 AMQuote from: 17 November on July 27, 2007, 06:39:48 PMThe existence of the phoenix is also affirmed by the well known ancient pagan writers such as Herodotus and Pliny among others.Not to mention Chris Claremont and John ByrneFor the sake of the Jews, you should not bump a 17 November thread. Klaatu Barada Nikto - Xenu said to bump the thread. So Xenu says, so I do! Xenu rules, not mine.
Wow, a 6 month necro.Thanks, November. We were running out of things to mock.
It's true. I am Moobs
if we cross pollinated our baby would be bald and pretty
Didn't know about the .net site.In any case, I'm not going to argue Biblical inerrancy with you. I learned long ago that debating with fundamentalists and conspiracy theoristspeople who know their subject well is like bashing your head against a brick wall. You never win.
In any case, I'm not going to argue with you.
Continually trumped on the phoenix, wakka wakka and company began attacking the Bible, and after the passage of time I can see that no one was able to respond to the explanation which I gave concerning the contradictions in the Bible.At any rate, getting back to the subject of giant birds:http://www.vtap.com/video/Ken+Gerhard+%253A+Cryptozoology+%2528Bigfoot%252C+Thunderbird%2529+1%252F12/CL0277940601_43bb87f6a_c3c6Y3J5cHRvem9vbG9neSB0aHVuZGVyYmlyZH5pbjoxfnE6c2V-bXc6Q3J5cHRvem9vbG9neSBCaWdmb290