Mr.Ireland, you're going to rival me for being a sarcastic troll tonight, I suggest we both stop.
Thank you Narc for explaining that for me. I however fail to see how this experiment could work. On rereading your first and second posts, the first not specifically mentioning that the observer is accelerating more, but the 2nd indirectly stating it, I assume that your point rests on the higher observer accelerating ever so slightly more than the lower object, or observee as my friend is trying to get me to write. However, assuming that the Earth is constantly accelerating, the light would be compressed, or would remain the same. That is, it would shift towards the red ennd of the spectrum or would remain where it was. If we assume the observer is constantly accelerating more than the object, then your experiment would be more credible. Are we assuming this?
I realise you're probably going to say this is obvious, but your next step would be to show why the observer is constantly accelerating. Or simply state that theobserver is in some kind of aircraft and is accelerating upwards (which would discredit the experiment anyway). I can see how you could reach this conclusion, using the apparant expansion of the universe, but do you really think it works in this case?