Star Trek > Star Wars

  • 64 Replies
  • 11308 Views
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Star Trek > Star Wars
« Reply #60 on: June 03, 2007, 09:51:00 PM »
When is the history channel inaccurate about things? If anything, it gives me interesting things to go and further investigate online and I hardly ever find inaccuracies in what they say--bias, perhaps, not-entirely-complete analysis every now and then--but it's not like they're going to go and blatantly lie about things. Honestly.

~D-Draw

You mean like when they lie about the holocaust?
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

Nomad

  • Official Member
  • 16983
Re: Star Trek > Star Wars
« Reply #61 on: June 03, 2007, 09:53:22 PM »
THE HISTORY CHANNEL LIES ABOUT MOBILE PHONES!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111
Nomad is a superhero.

8/30 NEVAR FORGET

Re: Star Trek > Star Wars
« Reply #62 on: June 03, 2007, 10:08:25 PM »
You forgot the: OMGWTFBBQ!!!123!!

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Star Trek > Star Wars
« Reply #63 on: June 03, 2007, 10:11:53 PM »
No, to be fair, they make mistakes I am sure they think people won't notice, or ones that are things only history nerds (like me) would notice.

Par example?

~D-Draw

*

Midnight

  • 7671
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: Star Trek > Star Wars
« Reply #64 on: June 04, 2007, 12:53:03 AM »


Who said I wanted a torrent?

Rhetorical question. No one did, I was simply amusing myself.
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.