When is the history channel inaccurate about things? If anything, it gives me interesting things to go and further investigate online and I hardly ever find inaccuracies in what they say--bias, perhaps, not-entirely-complete analysis every now and then--but it's not like they're going to go and blatantly lie about things. Honestly.~D-Draw
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
objectively good
Nomad is a superhero.
No, to be fair, they make mistakes I am sure they think people won't notice, or ones that are things only history nerds (like me) would notice.
Quote from: Midnight on June 03, 2007, 07:17:19 AMWho said I wanted a torrent?
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.