FE magnetic field

  • 179 Replies
  • 56022 Views
?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #150 on: December 09, 2007, 10:43:52 PM »
Its a shame none have you actually read what I've posted in this particular thread. You would realise that the battle is already over, sorry FE lost. Unless you can somehow produce factual evidence containing magnetic data suggesting that a Flat Earth Magnetic field is actually possible, enough of which refutes that magnetic data contained in igneous rocks, as well as geomagnetic reversal. Noone has explained how that is actually possible with a flat earth magnetic field yet...sigh

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=1361.80
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-75
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #151 on: December 10, 2007, 04:10:38 AM »
Its a shame you haven't read the current theory on FE magnetic fields and instead have waltzed in, retardedly bumped a months old thread, and then claimed victory over the obsolete concept put forth by one flat earther.  Grats.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2007, 04:12:47 AM by Username »
If ou can't argue both sides, you understad neither

?

Flying Chair

  • 18
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #152 on: December 11, 2007, 03:51:56 PM »
*Doesn't read topic*

I still find it hilarious how people are coming up with these "theories" of how Flat Earth works, when we already know [mostly] of how Round Earth works.

Just don't mind me lol'ing a bit.
http://www.winzy.com/FlyingChair
^Sign up to win stuff lol and help me win stuff too ^.^

*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • +0/-0
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #153 on: December 11, 2007, 08:54:34 PM »
Wow, 18 posts and he already gets it.   :-\

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #154 on: December 12, 2007, 11:26:09 PM »
Its a shame you haven't read the current theory on FE magnetic fields and instead have waltzed in, retardedly bumped a months old thread, and then claimed victory over the obsolete concept put forth by one flat earther.  Grats.


Show me this "New" Theory. Its funny how frequently "New" Theories for FE have to be conjured up because they have been disproved since the days of Aristotle, even though he was a geocite!
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-75
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #155 on: December 13, 2007, 12:45:32 PM »
Its a shame you haven't read the current theory on FE magnetic fields and instead have waltzed in, retardedly bumped a months old thread, and then claimed victory over the obsolete concept put forth by one flat earther.  Grats.


Show me this "New" Theory. Its funny how frequently "New" Theories for FE have to be conjured up because they have been disproved since the days of Aristotle, even though he was a geocite!
Believe it or not, I'm not put on this earth to use the search function for you.
If ou can't argue both sides, you understad neither

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #156 on: December 13, 2007, 08:17:11 PM »
Its a shame you haven't read the current theory on FE magnetic fields and instead have waltzed in, retardedly bumped a months old thread, and then claimed victory over the obsolete concept put forth by one flat earther.  Grats.


Show me this "New" Theory. Its funny how frequently "New" Theories for FE have to be conjured up because they have been disproved since the days of Aristotle, even though he was a geocite!
Believe it or not, I'm not put on this earth to use the search function for you.

Its because there isn't one. I've searched this forum and found nothing
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-75
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #157 on: December 14, 2007, 09:04:59 AM »
Its a shame you haven't read the current theory on FE magnetic fields and instead have waltzed in, retardedly bumped a months old thread, and then claimed victory over the obsolete concept put forth by one flat earther.  Grats.


Show me this "New" Theory. Its funny how frequently "New" Theories for FE have to be conjured up because they have been disproved since the days of Aristotle, even though he was a geocite!
Believe it or not, I'm not put on this earth to use the search function for you.

Its because there isn't one. I've searched this forum and found nothing
I was not put on this earth to use the search function for you because there is no search function?


Bump for your essay on black holes.
If ou can't argue both sides, you understad neither

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #158 on: December 16, 2007, 10:12:38 PM »
Its a shame you haven't read the current theory on FE magnetic fields and instead have waltzed in, retardedly bumped a months old thread, and then claimed victory over the obsolete concept put forth by one flat earther.  Grats.


Show me this "New" Theory. Its funny how frequently "New" Theories for FE have to be conjured up because they have been disproved since the days of Aristotle, even though he was a geocite!
Believe it or not, I'm not put on this earth to use the search function for you.

Its because there isn't one. I've searched this forum and found nothing
I was not put on this earth to use the search function for you because there is no search function?


Bump for your essay on black holes.

You're friend, like yourself havn't bothered to write more than three lines so its pointless to ask me for one. I'm still waiting for some kind of evidence to refute my arguments that FE theory can not explain the Earth's magnetic field
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #159 on: December 16, 2007, 11:16:58 PM »
Yet, I'm still waiting for a general essay about black holes you promised to write on.

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #160 on: December 16, 2007, 11:22:46 PM »
Yet, I'm still waiting for a general essay about black holes you promised to write on.

I'm still waiting on yours son. I've been waiting 9 months for someone to refute my Magnetic Field arguments
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #161 on: December 16, 2007, 11:28:28 PM »
Yet, I'm still waiting for a general essay about black holes you promised to write on.
I'm still waiting on yours son.
When did I said I will write an essay? It is you who brought the idea up. Therefore, it is now your responsibility to write it.

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #162 on: December 16, 2007, 11:40:09 PM »
Yet, I'm still waiting for a general essay about black holes you promised to write on.
I'm still waiting on yours son.
When did I said I will write an essay? It is you who brought the idea up. Therefore, it is now your responsibility to write it.

...still waiting...
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #163 on: December 17, 2007, 12:11:15 AM »
...Still waiting for your essay, since you said you will write it when I never said I would...

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-75
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #164 on: December 17, 2007, 07:45:22 AM »
I thought I remembered a post where you said you'd write it when you had time in the next few days, but I can't find that now.  Curious.
If ou can't argue both sides, you understad neither

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #165 on: December 17, 2007, 12:14:16 PM »
Right here:

Think of as a short essay. I'll give you a couple of days to write it. Not too long, just a general overview is fine. I'll even write an essay on it myself if you would like?
I'll post my actual report within the next couple of days, I'm off to visit my parents in about half an hour. I expected something of the following length at least.

Well, apparently someone chickened out.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-75
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #166 on: December 17, 2007, 12:56:51 PM »
Thanks.  Seems so.
If ou can't argue both sides, you understad neither

?

GG-Xtreme

  • 119
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #167 on: December 17, 2007, 03:46:00 PM »
A disk magnet cannot have a magnetic North pole at its center.

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #168 on: December 18, 2007, 07:31:21 PM »
stiiiilllll waaaiiiting


Jut because Jack think's he's a genius physicist, I'd like him to explain to me what happens in a Black Hole? Don't give me the airy fairy Flat Earth Society answers...Think of as a short essay. I'll give you a couple of days to write it. Not too long, just a general overview is fine. I'll even write an essay on it myself if you would like?
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #169 on: December 18, 2007, 11:11:57 PM »
stiiiilllll waaaiiiting


Jut because Jack think's he's a genius physicist, I'd like him to explain to me what happens in a Black Hole? Don't give me the airy fairy Flat Earth Society answers...Think of as a short essay. I'll give you a couple of days to write it. Not too long, just a general overview is fine. I'll even write an essay on it myself if you would like?
You ask me to write an essay =/= I ask myself to write an essay.

Look, everyone's waiting for your essay. So, where is it? Don't worry, there's always the "I Quit" button.

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #170 on: December 19, 2007, 01:46:17 AM »
where's yours?
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #171 on: December 19, 2007, 03:39:59 PM »
You ask me to write an essay =/= I ask myself to write an essay.

Look, everyone's waiting for your essay. So, where is it? Don't worry, there's always the "I Quit" button.

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #172 on: December 19, 2007, 06:32:51 PM »
where's yours
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #173 on: December 20, 2007, 03:39:07 PM »
So, you asked yourself to write an essay and you chickened out. Alright, I assume you already clicked the button. Thanks for playing. Come back any time.

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #174 on: December 20, 2007, 04:45:33 PM »
I asked you to write an essay first, where is it?
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #175 on: December 20, 2007, 07:15:54 PM »
So, you asked yourself to write an essay and you chickened out. Alright, I assume you already clicked the button. Thanks for playing. Come back any time.

?

Quarrior

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #176 on: December 20, 2007, 07:35:46 PM »
After you write yours, I will.
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #177 on: December 20, 2007, 07:59:35 PM »
So, you asked yourself to write an essay and you chickened out. Alright, I assume you already clicked the button. Thanks for playing. Come back any time.

*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #178 on: December 21, 2007, 12:12:18 AM »
NO U!!! lol
Dyslexics are teople poo!

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: FE magnetic field
« Reply #179 on: December 26, 2007, 12:54:22 PM »
this is the most tedious thread in the entire board.
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness