It's no slur if it's fact.
Time is never wasted when you're wasted all the time
tl;dr
Isn't this the most conclusive evidence we have of a Round Earth?
Better REers than you have made this point and failed. Photos are easily faked. If I showed you a picture of a flat Earth from space, would you accept it?
Videos are also easily faked.
The entire premise of this website is that NASA is a fraudulent entity. Any dolt could see that.If you require proof for this just consult one of the many moon/mars hoax websites. It is immediately obvious NASA is fraudulent just by looking at their financial records and noticing how they have a habit of spending $4000 for a single pencil.
Pictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right?
Quote from: Mr. Ireland on May 05, 2007, 06:23:41 AMPictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right? It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?
What about those images makes you think they accurately represent the earth?
Quote from: dysfunction on May 05, 2007, 09:29:12 PMQuote from: Mr. Ireland on May 05, 2007, 06:23:41 AMPictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right? It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?Not even close to true. CG is not as good as real life yet.
Quote from: sokarul on May 05, 2007, 11:38:05 PMQuote from: dysfunction on May 05, 2007, 09:29:12 PMQuote from: Mr. Ireland on May 05, 2007, 06:23:41 AMPictures I can believe because it's been done flawlessly before photoshop. Video's though, how would you go about that? That's like 1000 pictures for one little video. Right? It's not like they have to edit it one frame at a time. Well-done CG graphics are indistinguishable from reality. Why couldn't they easily fake those videos, especially when none of us have ever actually seen the Earth from space, and thus have nothing to compare it to when deciding whether a video is fake?Not even close to true. CG is not as good as real life yet. This just shows how little you know about current CG capabilities.
CG isn't good enough? Here is a digital model of the earth you can buy and extort entire nations with for only $398:http://www.the123d.com/3d-earth.html
Also, Chris is hot.
Wow. that's incredible. hoax or not, there's no dentying that's a formidable piece of software, if I had a free $400 knocking around the house I'd snap it up
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?