« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Proof of the FE

  • 55 Replies
  • 14869 Views
*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35374
  • Former President of Iraq
Proof of the FE
« on: May 04, 2007, 09:45:36 AM »
The Bible.

End of story.
Logged
?

∂G/∂x

  • 1536
  • All Rights Reversed
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2007, 09:48:30 AM »
Praise Jesus!

We shall henceforth banish the heathens from this green and pleasant (flat) Earth!
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The universe has already expanded forever

Quote from: Proverbs 24:17
Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth.
*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35374
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2007, 10:03:11 AM »
Praise his holy name!

Flatter Jesus or burn in hell!
Logged
?

Ethan_MVgolfer2008

  • 119
  • Who says that I don't have a life?
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2007, 01:39:27 PM »
There was a jesus but he was a man. A good man with a valuable message. How come you don't see churches across the nation rising up to claim the earth is flat. The government couldn't bribe the most devout christians, nor could they wipe them out. Even the most conservative sects of christainity believe the earth is flat.
Logged
The most useful tool in the world...sarcasm. The most useless tool in the world...Tom Bishop.
?

katmarie

  • 71
  • the moon is made of cheese
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2007, 05:29:24 PM »
How does the bible prove the FE theory?
Logged
i point and laugh at you
*

A Sceptic

  • 34
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2007, 05:30:11 PM »
Because it says so. And why is the bible credible? Because it says so.

My imaginary friend is better than your imaginary friend.
Logged
Quote from: Steve Jones
An energetic, all-inclusive and amusing account of man's impressive capacity for self-delusion. Every creationist should read it.
Quote for truth.
?

katmarie

  • 71
  • the moon is made of cheese
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2007, 05:33:57 PM »
Quote from: A Sceptic on May 04, 2007, 05:30:11 PM
Because it says so. And why is the bible credible? Because it says so.

My imaginary friend is better than your imaginary friend.
Nuhuh Friedrich is so much better than your friend!
Logged
i point and laugh at you
*

A Sceptic

  • 34
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2007, 05:43:15 PM »
My imaginary friend shall smite you! AHA! Ummm..... *runs away*
Logged
Quote from: Steve Jones
An energetic, all-inclusive and amusing account of man's impressive capacity for self-delusion. Every creationist should read it.
Quote for truth.
*

dysfunction

  • The Elder Ones
  • 2261
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2007, 08:58:59 PM »
Many FEers here are atheists. We do not require self-referential proofs to demonstrate the Earth's lack of rotundity.
Logged
the cake is a lie
?

∂G/∂x

  • 1536
  • All Rights Reversed
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2007, 04:31:14 AM »
You mean like a conspiracy that is evidence for its existence?
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The universe has already expanded forever

Quote from: Proverbs 24:17
Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth.
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18016
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2007, 08:01:05 AM »
A conspiracy is not provable by definition. Otherwise it wouldn't be a conspiracy.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2007, 08:32:24 AM by Tom Bishop »
Logged
?

Angelflesh

  • 70
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2007, 08:31:30 AM »
There is nothing in the definition of "Conspiracy" that says it's unprovable.
Logged
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18016
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2007, 08:34:53 AM »
A conspiracy is defined as a secret agreement between two or more people to perform an unlawful act. If there was conclusive proof for a conspiracy it wouldn't be a secret anymore, would it?
Logged
?

∂G/∂x

  • 1536
  • All Rights Reversed
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2007, 08:46:13 AM »
There isn't even inconclusive proof, it's a total fantasy (hence it's convenient agreement with FE theory).
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The universe has already expanded forever

Quote from: Proverbs 24:17
Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth.
?

Angelflesh

  • 70
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2007, 10:13:32 AM »
Quote
A conspiracy is defined as a secret agreement between two or more people to perform an unlawful act. If there was conclusive proof for a conspiracy it wouldn't be a secret anymore, would it?

That's only definition Tom... Anyways, firstly, just because something isn't proven, like a conspiracy, that doesn't mean it can't be proven. If i go by this definition alone, then yes, the conspiracy is totally provable. This is because if it's secret, then someone can find out that secret, this happens all the time with all sorts of secrets. There is also nothing in the definition of the word "secret" that says all secrets remain secrets.

You see Tom, a conspiracy doesn't need to be unprovable. You need it to be unprovable, because it's the back bone of your theory.
Logged
?

Mongrelman

  • 701
  • Blasphemy!
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #15 on: May 05, 2007, 03:36:00 PM »
Quote from: The Government Is Lying on May 04, 2007, 09:45:36 AM
The Bible.

End of story.

In one quote in the Bible, the Earth is described as a circle.  In another, it is described as having four corners.  It's already contradicted itself.  You see, the Bible is not meant to be taken literally.  And if you think it is, then I would very much appreciate an explanation of how a circle can have four corners.

No, this isn't proof that the Earth is round.  But it sure as hell isn't proof that the Earth is flat, either.
Logged
NOTICE:
I believe the Earth is round, and anything I say that suggests the contrary is stated for the spirit of debate.

Also, Viscount Dead Kangaroo > You.
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2007, 07:06:54 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on May 05, 2007, 08:34:53 AM
A conspiracy is defined as a secret agreement between two or more people to perform an unlawful act. If there was conclusive proof for a conspiracy it wouldn't be a secret anymore, would it?

Based on this definition it would be logically impossible for anybody but the people involved in the conspiracy to know about it, wouldn't it?

And you claim to know about it.  Are you part of the Conspiracy, Tom? :o
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

John McCall

  • 147
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #17 on: May 05, 2007, 07:30:55 PM »
Tom....are you mentally unstable? "A conspiracy cannot be defined" then "it is defined as" then "it cannot be proven"....
Logged
Mongrelman's the real douche.
?

Game_Guru777

  • 108
  • Truth knows no bounds...
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #18 on: May 05, 2007, 07:45:22 PM »
Firstly: "The Government is lying" is and RE'er, he just likes to imitate obsessive christens. (Nice job by the way... you act like a lemming, Following anything blindly  ;))

Secondly:
Quote from: Tom Bishop on May 05, 2007, 08:34:53 AM
A conspiracy is defined as a secret agreement between two or more people to perform an unlawful act. If there was conclusive proof for a conspiracy it wouldn't be a secret anymore, would it?
Since there is no proof of a conspiracy, why do most FE'ers (Including you) often say there is. If there is not, then what is keeping the 'truth' from coming out?

Thirdly: Tom, I have asked you several times, each time you have dodged the question. If there is a conspiracy, and they have such a handle on it... How did you figure it out, and why haven't you and every other FE'er on the site been silenced? It is a popular site and the people in charge of it would have seen it by now, correct?
« Last Edit: May 05, 2007, 07:49:42 PM by Game_Guru777 »
Logged
Hold it!!! Your statement directly contradicts the evidence.

Objection!!! Your claims make no sense! Think about what you are going to say before you say it!

Evidence is everything...
?

Mongrelman

  • 701
  • Blasphemy!
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2007, 08:17:37 PM »
Quote from: Game_Guru777 on May 05, 2007, 07:45:22 PM
Thirdly: Tom, I have asked you several times, each time you have dodged the question. If there is a conspiracy, and they have such a handle on it... How did you figure it out, and why haven't you and every other FE'er on the site been silenced? It is a popular site and the people in charge of it would have seen it by now, correct?

Of course not.  And I'm sure nobody would ever consider sending an email about this site to NASA, since NASA's contact addresses are so hard to come by (Click here to contact NASA)... [/sarcasm]  :)
Logged
NOTICE:
I believe the Earth is round, and anything I say that suggests the contrary is stated for the spirit of debate.

Also, Viscount Dead Kangaroo > You.
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18016
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #20 on: May 05, 2007, 08:29:05 PM »
The Conspiracy does play its hand at strategic moments. In the 90's when FES was gaining momentum again our main central Flat Earth Research Library was set ablaze via arson.

Much of the Flat Earth Society's unique literature throughout its 150 year history was lost in the fire.
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2007, 08:33:01 PM »
"Set ablaze via arson."  LOL.

Who was charged?
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

Mongrelman

  • 701
  • Blasphemy!
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2007, 08:33:46 PM »
This site has almost 11,000 members.  What are they waiting for, Tom?  Shouldn't they have closed this place down by now?
Logged
NOTICE:
I believe the Earth is round, and anything I say that suggests the contrary is stated for the spirit of debate.

Also, Viscount Dead Kangaroo > You.
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18016
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2007, 08:43:27 PM »
- There are really only a few Flat Earth proponents on this website.

- Shutting the website down would only throw fuel onto the fire.

- NASA is more concerned about the Apollo Moon Hoax guys. NASA reportedly has a public relations budget which strives to pound the moon landing into public consensus and the history books.

- The Conspiracy only plays its hand after the Flat Earth Society has a breakthrough, publishes a best seller, or receives international fame. The few users on this specific Flat Earth forum mean nothing to the Conspiracy.
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2007, 08:46:23 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on May 05, 2007, 08:43:27 PM
NASA reportedly has a public relations budget which strives to pound the moon landing into public consensus and the history books.

Source?
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

elephantshark44

  • 33
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2007, 09:08:16 PM »
tom...based on your logic...if this were true, the government would have simply shut down the publishing of these best seller flat earth books. the government could stop this movement much earlier than u claim...so, why not stop the publishing, rather than burning down a library? also, i don't see how shutting down this site would cause such a riot...i only heard of it a few weeks ago by way of my brother, angelflesh, who posts here, who also debunked your defenition of a conspiracy....
Logged
?

Game_Guru777

  • 108
  • Truth knows no bounds...
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #26 on: May 05, 2007, 09:23:45 PM »
Have you ever been offered a bribe Tom? Surely if they had such a strong hold on this wouldn't they have silenced you? I mean paying off some small man who is revealing big secrets about burning down libraries would be a big deal for them. So, Either you don't believe in flat earth, and there is no reason to pay you off, or... there is no need for the conspiracy because the earth is round.
Logged
Hold it!!! Your statement directly contradicts the evidence.

Objection!!! Your claims make no sense! Think about what you are going to say before you say it!

Evidence is everything...
?

sanity

  • 93
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #27 on: May 06, 2007, 03:37:59 AM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on May 05, 2007, 08:01:05 AM
A conspiracy is not provable by definition. Otherwise it wouldn't be a conspiracy.
An FE troll is not disprovable by definition. Otherwise it wouldn't be an FE troll.
Logged
?

John McCall

  • 147
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #28 on: May 06, 2007, 08:35:19 AM »
Also, none of you FE'rs have the slightest shred of evidence about the conspiracy.  It's a total myth that explains something fallaciously...like "Phaethon."

So...shut up or F**K up
Logged
Mongrelman's the real douche.
?

sanity

  • 93
Re: Proof of the FE
« Reply #29 on: May 06, 2007, 12:21:42 PM »
Quote from: John McCall on May 06, 2007, 08:35:19 AM
Also, none of you FE'rs have the slightest shred of evidence about the conspiracy.  It's a total myth that explains something fallaciously...like "Phaethon."

So...shut up or F**K up
Flaming doesn't work on trolls or FEs, especially not deluded ones. For normal ones it takes some kind of reverse mega ownage. Since Tom ignores posts that's impossible. He's some incredible uber-|33+age super troll.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »