I don't think Truthseeker and Tom Bishop are the same. If they were, they'd be lying. Why would they lie? I don't understand why anyone would lie. The Bible says to be honest! I believe in the goodness of all people and that until we find real evidence to the contrary we should just take Truthseeker and Tom Bishop at their word. If not, we fail as human beings and there is no hope for us! 
Amazing isn't it, what these people believe in? They refuse to believe there can be more than one person who believes that the earth is flat, so they have to make up this belief that we are all one and the same so they can point their fingers and project all their hatred onto us. And they think just because we are on the same side that this "proves" that we are all Tom. My God, is this really the best science can do? Does it have to devolve into cheap name calling? I don't see any flat earth theorists doing that here. Only round earth theorists. What does that say about them?
My, my, their belief systems must be so rock solid if they are so threatened by another valid theory which challenges their views.
That is a truly brilliant expose on...Reading Comprehenshion = Binary 0. No one on this site, myself included, has said Tom is all of the FE minds in one person. I firmly believe that of the posters here, TheEngineer, Logic, Skeptical, and about 9 others actually are serious, regardless of their stance on the debate premise.
Tom, however, is not.
Tom has approximately 9 alternate accounts. I know this to be a fact for the following reasons:
A - He never denies it.
B - His language, diction, usage, and sentence structure change so minimally as to be insulting to the intelligence of a dung beetle. He simply has no psychological ability to mask his personality. Transparent as glass.
C - The mods themselves never deny it.
D - The mods themselves never actually go to the length of actually DISCIPLINING him for his behavior, because his presence has been institutionalized to ensure the debate can never be rationally exported past the same copy paste googlisms he is so infamous for lifting off StyleProject.com.
E - I have asked Daniel, point blank, in a pm, if Tom was serious or not, and he was evasive about who Tom even WAS. He didn't say he was or was not serious, but he seemed to lean away from Tom as a subject to begin with. This raisies questions.
F - Everytime someone posts with little to no posts that fit his pattern of speech and text and diction and etc, he disappears, then instantly reappears, JUST LONG ENOUGH for it to make sense.
G - He cannot debate his way out of a paper bag, and, honestly, as far as I have seen, has been the only person here, since I arrived, to outright ignore a post that put him in a corner. The others may jab at it, nitpick it, or whatnot, but he is the only one who consistently ignores a post he cannot refute. This is his signature, his modus operandi, name your cliche'.
The man is not serious, nor is he going to take responsibility for the shit he tosses into our hamburger. It's just that fucking simple.